collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Remington 7400 30-06, "high or low"?  (Read 2208 times)

Offline WapitiTalk1

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 8028
  • Location: Wet Side, Rainier, WA
  • Groups: RMEF, NRA, US Army (R)
Remington 7400 30-06, "high or low"?
« on: June 20, 2018, 09:34:30 AM »
Getting ready to help a buddy select and install a scope on his REM 7400 SA 30-06.  The iron front/rear sights are present and intact.  Here's the question for you cats that have handled/hunted with the old REM SA's more than I... Is it recommended to put the old see through mounts on this rifle, or, just go with a 0 MOA rail and rings (probably the Weaver tactical rings.. I like those)?  I can get the see thru mounts anywhere but would be grabbing the rail (if I go that route) through EGW Guns (I've had great luck with them). 

Question:  Your thoughts on installing a see through mounting system (so he still has the iron sights available) vs. a rail and rings?

Thanks!  RJ     

 
Darton Archery Maverick II
Traditions Vortek StrikeFire Smoke Pole
Weatherby VG-2 Boomstick
"Poking at a campfire with a stick is one of life's great satisfactions." Patrick F. McManus

Offline Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12169
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: Remington 7400 30-06, "high or low"?
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2018, 09:36:46 AM »
The high see through type prevent good cheek contact with the stock IMO. That exact set up on 760 got me my first "scope eye"
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline blackveltbowhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 4141
  • BLAM
Re: Remington 7400 30-06, "high or low"?
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2018, 10:06:27 AM »
I ran both setups. The standard rail IMO was waaaaaay better.  More comfortable, quicker to target, less clunky, looked better and more secure. I think the old see through rails are from a time when optics were far less dependable than todays stuff. 

Offline WapitiTalk1

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 8028
  • Location: Wet Side, Rainier, WA
  • Groups: RMEF, NRA, US Army (R)
Re: Remington 7400 30-06, "high or low"?
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2018, 10:41:41 AM »
Makes sense, thank you gentlemen.  Does the existing front sight post need to be removed or is it a non factor (non visible) when using a rail/ring system?  Seems like I recall it was a non issue with the REM 700s but not sure about the 7400s...     
Darton Archery Maverick II
Traditions Vortek StrikeFire Smoke Pole
Weatherby VG-2 Boomstick
"Poking at a campfire with a stick is one of life's great satisfactions." Patrick F. McManus

Offline Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12169
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: Remington 7400 30-06, "high or low"?
« Reply #4 on: June 20, 2018, 10:43:56 AM »
I have no issue with the front sight showing in the scope, I did have to take the rear sight off.
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline WapitiTalk1

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 8028
  • Location: Wet Side, Rainier, WA
  • Groups: RMEF, NRA, US Army (R)
Re: Remington 7400 30-06, "high or low"?
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2018, 10:51:35 AM »
Copy that; figured the rear would have to come off.  Do you remember if you used low rings on your setup Woodchuck?   
Darton Archery Maverick II
Traditions Vortek StrikeFire Smoke Pole
Weatherby VG-2 Boomstick
"Poking at a campfire with a stick is one of life's great satisfactions." Patrick F. McManus

Offline baker5150

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 3280
  • Groups: Loser's Lounge - Lifetime Member
Re: Remington 7400 30-06, "high or low"?
« Reply #6 on: June 20, 2018, 10:58:51 AM »
Copy that; figured the rear would have to come off.  Do you remember if you used low rings on your setup Woodchuck?   

This would usually depend on the scope being mounted

Offline Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12169
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: Remington 7400 30-06, "high or low"?
« Reply #7 on: June 20, 2018, 11:09:30 AM »
Copy that; figured the rear would have to come off.  Do you remember if you used low rings on your setup Woodchuck?   
I used low ones but the scope is a 40mm reticle. baker5150 nailed it.
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline WapitiTalk1

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 8028
  • Location: Wet Side, Rainier, WA
  • Groups: RMEF, NRA, US Army (R)
Re: Remington 7400 30-06, "high or low"?
« Reply #8 on: June 20, 2018, 11:16:24 AM »
Ya, it’ll be a 40 MM objective. Probably gonna recommend/put a Sig Sauer 3X9 on buddies old REM.
Darton Archery Maverick II
Traditions Vortek StrikeFire Smoke Pole
Weatherby VG-2 Boomstick
"Poking at a campfire with a stick is one of life's great satisfactions." Patrick F. McManus

Offline Calvin Rayborn

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 1383
  • Location: Columbia Basin
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, ATA Gold-Card Life Member
Re: Remington 7400 30-06, "high or low"?
« Reply #9 on: June 23, 2018, 10:25:25 PM »
I ran both setups. The standard rail IMO was waaaaaay better.  More comfortable, quicker to target, less clunky, looked better and more secure. I think the old see through rails are from a time when optics were far less dependable than todays stuff.

 :yeah: couldn’t have said it better

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Your biggest spike elk by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 09:59:11 AM]


Big Changes for USFS by nwmein199
[Today at 09:07:09 AM]


Stop the Coyote "game" classification proposal by Green Tree
[Today at 08:34:42 AM]


Discretion !!! by hunter399
[Today at 06:58:22 AM]


No 4-1 fools joke. by Henrydog
[Today at 05:06:28 AM]


Stick with the 50's by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:39:34 PM]


What to do?? by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 08:16:12 PM]


Montana Big Game Combo Draw chances by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 08:10:13 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:07:39 PM]


Bills to relocate Bob Oke and continue pheasant release programs by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 04:13:03 PM]


Where to buy beef? by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 03:16:48 PM]


Back to the Pack - Hunting backpack suggestions by Dark2Dark
[Yesterday at 03:11:34 PM]


Small plastic boats? by slm9s
[Yesterday at 10:56:47 AM]


Idaho Non-Res draw results by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 10:05:04 AM]


Coyote broke my cage by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:56:36 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal