collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Orca Task Force Draft Report  (Read 1122 times)

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13193
  • Location: Arlington
Orca Task Force Draft Report
« on: September 26, 2018, 08:20:34 AM »
Read and weep:

https://www.governor.wa.gov/sites/default/files/SRKWDraftReport_09-24-18.pdf

My brief assessment based on a sportfishing view:

1.  Fish hatcheries were noted as a way to increase chinook production, but a laundry list of "proven" problems vs natural production were noted.  The task force lists as fact that there are unsolvable problems to hatchery production.  This was an interesting portion as the committee almost admitted hatcheries were necessary in the very short future but went to great length to describe and hint that the real solution, the best solution would be for no hatcheries and only wild production.

2.  Water quality and climate change were noted in great length as impacting Orcas despite thin at best science.  I guess it is generally assumed.  This leads to potentially endless ways to increase regulation on virtually everything.  Little to no data or science, just talk about all kinds of environmental regulations for water quality and climate change in general.  I expect this to be added to the reasons justifying climate change legislation.

3.  Seal/Sea lion predation was noted, but only admitted for the Columbia where the mountain of data is impossible to hide.  For Puget Sound, studies were not only ignored, but actually denied to have existed.  The only recommendation was an endless train of further studies, probably until someone somehow publishes the answer they are looking for.  There are studies that show the overpopulation level of these predators and how they consume many multiples of what commercial, recreational and Orcas do.  This is the single largest portion of the salmon take, yet no recommendations to lower it for Puget Sound were even proposed.  Some talk of the Columbia was mentioned, but I don't know too many Orcas that frequent the upper Columbia.

4.  Recommendation to create and expand "no-go" areas in Marine Areas 4, 5, 6 and 7.  Obviously these would be areas that Orcas, and thus chinook, frequent.

5.  Recommendation to create system where WDFW would be required to immediately shut down all fishing when the Orcas are in town.  Complete closure of fishery regardless of quota.

6.  Vague recommendations on how small craft sonar should be shut down when close to Orcas (1 km).

7.  No plan on how to fund any of it other than "general fund".  Much of the burden would fall to WDFW.

8.  Introduction of licenses for whale watching both commercially and recreationally.  If you are perceived to be watching them for more than 15 minutes, you need a license or face a fine.

9.  Recommendations to reduce by-catch.  For recreational fishing, this would likely include seasons where chinook are to be released - potentially impacting every season we have.


All in all, awesome hit job where science is largely ignored.  Correct me if I am wrong.

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14562
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Orca Task Force Draft Report
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2018, 08:25:05 AM »
I think #3 would be easy enough to correct with the fastest results.  But WDFW supposedly won't hear of it.  Really need the tribes to push the harbor seal issue on the feds.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13193
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Orca Task Force Draft Report
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2018, 08:28:37 AM »
I think #3 would be easy enough to correct with the fastest results.  But WDFW supposedly won't hear of it.  Really need the tribes to push the harbor seal issue on the feds.

Yep, crank up hatchery production and thin the seals would result in by far the best impact as well as litigation, so we default to climate change and reducing sport and commercial take.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho deer question by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 11:08:25 PM]


good area for idaho elk open to public by pd
[Yesterday at 10:29:47 PM]


Who knows electric bikes? looking at Quietkat options by Westside88
[Yesterday at 09:00:34 PM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by ASHQUACK
[Yesterday at 08:55:35 PM]


Blackstone newbie by kenzmad
[Yesterday at 08:48:46 PM]


Anyone own a Hewescraft Sportsman 160? by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 08:23:33 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Yesterday at 08:03:41 PM]


Tease 'l' by highcountry_hunter
[Yesterday at 07:43:59 PM]


Quality deer hunt by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 07:36:09 PM]


Ice fishing for walleye by Russ McDonald
[Yesterday at 07:05:13 PM]


Put a ring on it by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 05:20:59 PM]


Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves by 509
[Yesterday at 05:18:11 PM]


Pointing Dog Trainer by wildweeds
[Yesterday at 04:52:56 PM]


Homemade saltwater fishing gear by Wetwoodshunter
[Yesterday at 04:32:08 PM]


Montana Cutting Deer Licenses by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 02:55:36 PM]


The Lookback by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 01:06:08 PM]


This year, last year by Caseknife
[Yesterday at 12:58:10 PM]


Stickers by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 12:16:11 PM]


From Behind by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 11:48:13 AM]


Kubota repair shop by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 10:40:20 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal