collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Department of Natural Resources  (Read 3886 times)

Offline Palmer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 366
  • Location: Bellevue
  • Educated from the wilderness
Department of Natural Resources
« on: October 22, 2007, 06:37:49 PM »
Here's some info I came across.  I wonder if the DNR thinks of planting trees and bushes for the deer population and other big game.  In alot of areas I only see fir trees.  I wish I'd see more oaks, mulberries, pines, and fruit trees.  When I'm on DNR property it looks like they were looking out for the birds.

"The United States government passed a law, the Pittman-Robertson Act in 1937, to protect wildlife resources that collects an excise tax of 11% of the cost to buy any firearms, guns, or ammunition. This 11% excise tax is sent to the Department of Natural Resources of each State to protect the wildlife habitat and food plots. Over two billion dollars of funding to preserve wildlife habitat has financed wildlife welfare since 1937."[/font][/font]

Offline robb92

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3685
  • Location: Spokane Wa, Andrews AFB, Maryland and King George, VA
Re: Department of Natural Resources
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2007, 07:06:39 PM »
Some of it would depend on what type of trees will grow in that enviroment. Why would you waste money to plant trees that you know will not grow in that enviroment. I would like to see more pine trees where I live but all we have is oak, walnut or maple, very few pines, and that makes it a pain in the butt during hunting season because of the leaves. 
"ITS NOT WHAT THE WISE MAN SAYS BUT WHAT THE WISE MAN DOES IN HIS LIFE THAT MATTERS"


Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: Department of Natural Resources
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2007, 06:03:21 AM »
Don't quote me, but I am pretty sure that the PR act sends money to our F&G. Not all states have a F&G to manage wildlife.

As for tree plantings...it is all about the money.




Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Department of Natural Resources
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2007, 09:38:12 AM »
 I used to volunteer for some of those projects and I work with some DNR folks. The plant selection almost always has to do with what was native to that area, for example; Mulberry if not present prior to planting likely would not be on the planting list. I agree with you though, more thought towards wildlife could be given in some areas. Most KCDNR land cater's to hiker's, bird watcher's, etc., so they tend to plant a lot of larger, aesthetic and berry producing stuff like elderberry, Osier Dogwood, Snowberry, Spruce and Vine Maple. If they really wanted to help out the ungulates, they'd be planting more; Trailing Blackberry, Thimble/Salmon Berry and overseeding with clovers, wild wheat, etc..

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

3 pintails by hdshot
[Today at 07:10:22 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Today at 05:42:19 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by pianoman9701
[Today at 04:34:46 PM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by Alan K
[Today at 03:46:09 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Today at 12:43:12 PM]


2025 Crab! by trophyhunt
[Today at 11:09:27 AM]


erronulvin trail cam photos by kodiak06
[Today at 10:19:35 AM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Today at 09:55:24 AM]


If you've been following.... by HighlandLofts
[Today at 03:03:24 AM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 08:06:11 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal