Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: SilkOnTheWetSide on November 01, 2018, 05:15:56 AMQuote from: yorketransport on October 31, 2018, 09:06:48 PMQuote from: SilkOnTheWetSide on October 31, 2018, 08:19:03 PMPractice and know your rifle. Learn how to calculate ballistics and read wind.It took me missing two bears in the Wenaha to get serious about my shooting.Now I won’t even send one unless we are shooting 600+. Ammo and bullets are too expensive 😆I’d start there. Download a ballistic program, buy a kestrel and learn how to dial. Throw those ballistic dials away.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkMan, I'd do just the opposite except for the go shooting part. Ditch the gear and just go shoot stuff.For bullets I'm on a lead free kick right now for all my hunting guns. I've had great luck with Barnes bullets, but I don't shoot nearly as many big game animals as a lot of guys do. I typically use the TTSX bullets though which solve a lot of the problems that the TSX and original X bullets had. I shoot a lot smaller stuff like porcupines to test bullets though and I've had some pretty spectacular results on those. I'm really loving the Hammer bullets for the last 2 years. They shoot as well as Bergers do in all my guns with less load development and higher velocity compared to other similar weight bullets. I've yet to have one fail to expand in all my completely unscientific testing with impact velocities as low as 1650 fps, as long as they were properly stabilized. The same goes for the Berger bullets I tested too though.For lead core bullets it's really hard to beat Accubonds. Those were my go to hunting bullet before I went lead free and they always performed and shot really well for me.If you are shooting long range, especially long range at animals I think you’ll save yourself a lot of headache and frustration if you learn to dial.Using hold over at varying elevations at range is just being plain lazy IMO.I’ve been on that side of the equation—and since I’ve gone this way I realized how bad it was.I’m not going to get into a bullet discussion...but I’m shooting a 28 Nosler with Hand Loaded 195 Berger’s, and been happy with the performance on game I’ve killed.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkHe’s only planning to shoot 3-400 yards. There’s no reason to invest a bunch of money in equipment that’s really unnecessary at that range. With a little practice it’s easy to make consistent hits on kill zone sized targets using simple hold overs and a duplex reticle. Keep it simple and affordable and people will shoot more.Quote from: jasnt on November 01, 2018, 07:22:26 AMSometimes I dial and hold That’s when you know you’re having fun. When you’re out of adjustments and you have to dial down the magnification on a second focal plane scope so you can get enough holdover.
Quote from: yorketransport on October 31, 2018, 09:06:48 PMQuote from: SilkOnTheWetSide on October 31, 2018, 08:19:03 PMPractice and know your rifle. Learn how to calculate ballistics and read wind.It took me missing two bears in the Wenaha to get serious about my shooting.Now I won’t even send one unless we are shooting 600+. Ammo and bullets are too expensive 😆I’d start there. Download a ballistic program, buy a kestrel and learn how to dial. Throw those ballistic dials away.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkMan, I'd do just the opposite except for the go shooting part. Ditch the gear and just go shoot stuff.For bullets I'm on a lead free kick right now for all my hunting guns. I've had great luck with Barnes bullets, but I don't shoot nearly as many big game animals as a lot of guys do. I typically use the TTSX bullets though which solve a lot of the problems that the TSX and original X bullets had. I shoot a lot smaller stuff like porcupines to test bullets though and I've had some pretty spectacular results on those. I'm really loving the Hammer bullets for the last 2 years. They shoot as well as Bergers do in all my guns with less load development and higher velocity compared to other similar weight bullets. I've yet to have one fail to expand in all my completely unscientific testing with impact velocities as low as 1650 fps, as long as they were properly stabilized. The same goes for the Berger bullets I tested too though.For lead core bullets it's really hard to beat Accubonds. Those were my go to hunting bullet before I went lead free and they always performed and shot really well for me.If you are shooting long range, especially long range at animals I think you’ll save yourself a lot of headache and frustration if you learn to dial.Using hold over at varying elevations at range is just being plain lazy IMO.I’ve been on that side of the equation—and since I’ve gone this way I realized how bad it was.I’m not going to get into a bullet discussion...but I’m shooting a 28 Nosler with Hand Loaded 195 Berger’s, and been happy with the performance on game I’ve killed.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: SilkOnTheWetSide on October 31, 2018, 08:19:03 PMPractice and know your rifle. Learn how to calculate ballistics and read wind.It took me missing two bears in the Wenaha to get serious about my shooting.Now I won’t even send one unless we are shooting 600+. Ammo and bullets are too expensive 😆I’d start there. Download a ballistic program, buy a kestrel and learn how to dial. Throw those ballistic dials away.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkMan, I'd do just the opposite except for the go shooting part. Ditch the gear and just go shoot stuff.For bullets I'm on a lead free kick right now for all my hunting guns. I've had great luck with Barnes bullets, but I don't shoot nearly as many big game animals as a lot of guys do. I typically use the TTSX bullets though which solve a lot of the problems that the TSX and original X bullets had. I shoot a lot smaller stuff like porcupines to test bullets though and I've had some pretty spectacular results on those. I'm really loving the Hammer bullets for the last 2 years. They shoot as well as Bergers do in all my guns with less load development and higher velocity compared to other similar weight bullets. I've yet to have one fail to expand in all my completely unscientific testing with impact velocities as low as 1650 fps, as long as they were properly stabilized. The same goes for the Berger bullets I tested too though.For lead core bullets it's really hard to beat Accubonds. Those were my go to hunting bullet before I went lead free and they always performed and shot really well for me.
Practice and know your rifle. Learn how to calculate ballistics and read wind.It took me missing two bears in the Wenaha to get serious about my shooting.Now I won’t even send one unless we are shooting 600+. Ammo and bullets are too expensive 😆I’d start there. Download a ballistic program, buy a kestrel and learn how to dial. Throw those ballistic dials away.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sometimes I dial and hold
Quote from: Taco280AI on November 01, 2018, 09:40:16 AMWhy is it that in so many of these threads, when a person is talking about 300-400 yard shots on game others have to show up with useless info about 700+ yard equipment and shooting? Nobody cares! It's irrelevant! Hey guys, I'm looking to get a light pickup for daily driving...You need the Ram 3500 Cummins, blah blah blah...Um, no.Essentially the same thing.Because some guys have to let the world know their brilliance of choosing a 3500 Cummins for a daily driver (guys that actually have use for that kind of truck on a daily basis excluded). Truth is there's a lot of bullets that work for the application, just like there's a ton of cars that work as daily drivers, from cheap to expensive. Still, it's fun to turn the mirror on guys that say any other way than there's is "lazy" or "unethical".
Why is it that in so many of these threads, when a person is talking about 300-400 yard shots on game others have to show up with useless info about 700+ yard equipment and shooting? Nobody cares! It's irrelevant! Hey guys, I'm looking to get a light pickup for daily driving...You need the Ram 3500 Cummins, blah blah blah...Um, no.Essentially the same thing.
Anyways............have I mentioned accubonds and imr4350 lately
Quote from: theleo on November 01, 2018, 10:04:11 AMQuote from: Taco280AI on November 01, 2018, 09:40:16 AMWhy is it that in so many of these threads, when a person is talking about 300-400 yard shots on game others have to show up with useless info about 700+ yard equipment and shooting? Nobody cares! It's irrelevant! Hey guys, I'm looking to get a light pickup for daily driving...You need the Ram 3500 Cummins, blah blah blah...Um, no.Essentially the same thing.Because some guys have to let the world know their brilliance of choosing a 3500 Cummins for a daily driver (guys that actually have use for that kind of truck on a daily basis excluded). Truth is there's a lot of bullets that work for the application, just like there's a ton of cars that work as daily drivers, from cheap to expensive. Still, it's fun to turn the mirror on guys that say any other way than there's is "lazy" or "unethical".It literally has nothing to do with that.Your example is absurd and not comparable in the slightest to the original question.You should be practicing at longer ranges so that when presented with a 400 yard shot it’s a chip. Anytime someone starts talking about “stretching” their effective range, it’s a worthy conversation to have concerning learning about ballistics and elevation dialing.I didn’t recommend he build a custom rifle. I recommended he get some basic equipment and learn about ballistics.Just keep doing your Kentucky windage. 👍👍 I’ll instead work on being as effective as possible.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: Karl Blanchard on November 01, 2018, 11:43:58 AMAnyways............have I mentioned accubonds and imr4350 lately Just for the sake of conversation, why would you start off with Accubonds? Why not 165gr Interlocks, Hot-cors, or Game Kings? Part of the beauty of the 308 is it doesn't require premium bullets for premium results. Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Don't know his answer, but mine would be because I've never had a bad result with them. I get a little better accuracy with my LRX load, but I'd still happily rock the Abond if I had to. Premium as in price or other? If price, bullets are still very low in cost compared to everything else. If in terms of performance without high velocity, they'll still open up very well at slower speeds and still hold together well should you find yourself 30 yards away.
I've got interlock 30 cals in 150, 165, and 180's on the shelf as well as 140's for my wife's 270 and one last half box of 100gr for the .243 that wont be replaced. Great bullets. Big hornady fan