Antelope Capture - WE HAVE ALL THE VOLUNTEERS WE NEED NOW. THANKS!

[bearpaw]

Thanks for giving us the whole story! 

[MtnMuley]

I'm surprised at all the support for SCI putting in all the time and effort to transplant lopes to the Yak Rez. Do you guys have hopes they will move off rez and hope WDFW will invest time, money, and resources to making an eventual season? WDFW can't effectively manage the game they have nowdays. I certainly don't like the idea of my money donated to SCI going to fund projects for the Yak Rez. What have they done to help us manage any game or bring in animals on off rez lands, besides over harvest animals on "ceded" ground? Again, just curious for all this support.......

No offense, but I'm really having to bite my tongue when it comes to responding to this uninformed comment.  Particularly when I'm in a bad mood after spending a couple days in Olympia fighting the anti-gun crowd and see hardly anyone showing up to help.  I've said it before and I'll say it again. Firearm owners are incredibly lazy. Lot's of bitching and almost no engagement when the chips are down. Hunters as a whole are even lazier. It's pathetic and hugely frustrating for those of us that are pouring a TON of time, energy and money into the fight.  Okay...rant over.


A brief history of SCI's antelope reintroduction efforts:

- We wanted to reintroduce antelope to their historical ranges in Washington State in an effort to improve biodiversity and eventually have another huntable species in this state.

- WDFW was adamantly oppossed to the reintroduction of a historically native species, to the point that we were warned that severe prosecution of anyone attempting to do so would happen.

- We determined that it was illegal to bring antelope into Washington lands, but not "sovereign" lands of the tribes.

- We approached the tribes and began a dialog with them, which ultimately resulted in a good working partnership with them and their biologists that helped in turn pave the way for good relationships with biologists in other states.  (As an aside, the best biologists in this state work for the tribes!)

- We had ZERO help from WDFW in this regard, in fact the convoy of the first reintroduction was stopped by a WSP roadblock. Because the antelope were with tribal members and destined for tribals lands, we were able to essentially flip them the bird and drive on and complete that initial translocation.

- The first sets of antelope were affixed with radio collars - reasonably cost effective technology for the time, that allowed us to keep loose tabs on them as they spread out in the Spring, Summer and Fall to areas far outside the Rezervation boundaries.  They tend to band up in the winter and for whatever reason  lot of them move back onto the Rez.

- With follow-on reintroductions, we paid for and equipped the antelope with GPS collars, thereby helping keep much closer tabs on their whereabouts. 3 pings a day.

- Because they are here - hopefully to stay, and seem to be growing and spreading around the state outside of the Rez in healthy sustainable numbers with continued injections of new DNA, WDFW has finally accepted that they need to be involved and are working with us in the management and protection of the species.

- As antelope spread well beyond the boundaries of the Yakima and Colville reservation boundaries, we need to work with landowners and convince them that having antelope on the landscape again is a good thing. Outside of the rare hard-case, they have been very supportive.

I hope this brief explanation helps clear up the who/what/where/when/why it is important to support SCI in our hunter advocacy and wildlife conservation efforts.  This is the tip of the iceberg of what we do for hunters and wildlife.

No offense to other conservation org's, (I belong to and support a laundry list of them) but I would encourage people to join SCI before joining or donating to any other organization.

First - NRA, they are the big dog in the fight. Damn hard to hunt if you can't own/use a firearm.
Second - SCI, we are the 800 lb. gorilla with massive political influence at the local, state, national, and international level.  It's in our logo, but we are literally FIRST FOR HUNTERS!  Join us...there is strength in numbers!

Third...the critter club of your choice. Like to hunt elk? Join RMEF. Like to hunt ducks? Join a waterfowl organization like DU, Delta Waterfowl or Washington Waterfowlers. Like to hunt Sheep...join WSF. Etc.

Please join and get involved in this order.

Thank you.

Allen

Let me start by saying:

Number 1, don't lump me into being a "lazy" hunter or gun owner.
Number 2, I understand the importance of the NRA, SCI, and all other organizations fighting for our rights and animals.
Number 3, I don't care how bad of mood you're in for fighting for your beliefs and organizations.  I've done plenty of that myself and appreciate your efforts.

I'm actually fairly informed about most issues like this.  From a personal standpoint, I'd much rather the SCI efforts be focused on predator control issues and dwindling deer and moose numbers in the NC and NE parts of the state. AGAIN, WDFW CAN NOT EFFECTIVELY MANAGE THE PREDATORS NOR UNGULATES THEY ALREADY HAVE, so why would one think they'd be able to be able to manage and sustain a healthy pronghorn population in the long run?  These are just straight forward issues I personally find concerning.

Again, thank you for your dedicated efforts with this project, whether I agree or not.  I have seen and taken pictures of lopes in South Tonasket, outside Riverside, outside Omak, North of Monse, Northwest of Brewster, and throughout Douglas, Grant, and Benton counties.  Seems they might be here for a while.

[Special T]

I'm surprised at all the support for SCI putting in all the time and effort to transplant lopes to the Yak Rez. Do you guys have hopes they will move off rez and hope WDFW will invest time, money, and resources to making an eventual season? WDFW can't effectively manage the game they have nowdays. I certainly don't like the idea of my money donated to SCI going to fund projects for the Yak Rez. What have they done to help us manage any game or bring in animals on off rez lands, besides over harvest animals on "ceded" ground? Again, just curious for all this support.......

No offense, but I'm really having to bite my tongue when it comes to responding to this uninformed comment.  Particularly when I'm in a bad mood after spending a couple days in Olympia fighting the anti-gun crowd and see hardly anyone showing up to help.  I've said it before and I'll say it again. Firearm owners are incredibly lazy. Lot's of bitching and almost no engagement when the chips are down. Hunters as a whole are even lazier. It's pathetic and hugely frustrating for those of us that are pouring a TON of time, energy and money into the fight.  Okay...rant over.


A brief history of SCI's antelope reintroduction efforts:

- We wanted to reintroduce antelope to their historical ranges in Washington State in an effort to improve biodiversity and eventually have another huntable species in this state.

- WDFW was adamantly oppossed to the reintroduction of a historically native species, to the point that we were warned that severe prosecution of anyone attempting to do so would happen.

- We determined that it was illegal to bring antelope into Washington lands, but not "sovereign" lands of the tribes.

- We approached the tribes and began a dialog with them, which ultimately resulted in a good working partnership with them and their biologists that helped in turn pave the way for good relationships with biologists in other states.  (As an aside, the best biologists in this state work for the tribes!)

- We had ZERO help from WDFW in this regard, in fact the convoy of the first reintroduction was stopped by a WSP roadblock. Because the antelope were with tribal members and destined for tribals lands, we were able to essentially flip them the bird and drive on and complete that initial translocation.

- The first sets of antelope were affixed with radio collars - reasonably cost effective technology for the time, that allowed us to keep loose tabs on them as they spread out in the Spring, Summer and Fall to areas far outside the Rezervation boundaries.  They tend to band up in the winter and for whatever reason  lot of them move back onto the Rez.

- With follow-on reintroductions, we paid for and equipped the antelope with GPS collars, thereby helping keep much closer tabs on their whereabouts. 3 pings a day.

- Because they are here - hopefully to stay, and seem to be growing and spreading around the state outside of the Rez in healthy sustainable numbers with continued injections of new DNA, WDFW has finally accepted that they need to be involved and are working with us in the management and protection of the species.

- As antelope spread well beyond the boundaries of the Yakima and Colville reservation boundaries, we need to work with landowners and convince them that having antelope on the landscape again is a good thing. Outside of the rare hard-case, they have been very supportive.

I hope this brief explanation helps clear up the who/what/where/when/why it is important to support SCI in our hunter advocacy and wildlife conservation efforts.  This is the tip of the iceberg of what we do for hunters and wildlife.

No offense to other conservation org's, (I belong to and support a laundry list of them) but I would encourage people to join SCI before joining or donating to any other organization.

First - NRA, they are the big dog in the fight. Damn hard to hunt if you can't own/use a firearm.
Second - SCI, we are the 800 lb. gorilla with massive political influence at the local, state, national, and international level.  It's in our logo, but we are literally FIRST FOR HUNTERS!  Join us...there is strength in numbers!

Third...the critter club of your choice. Like to hunt elk? Join RMEF. Like to hunt ducks? Join a waterfowl organization like DU, Delta Waterfowl or Washington Waterfowlers. Like to hunt Sheep...join WSF. Etc.

Please join and get involved in this order.

Thank you.

Allen

Let me start by saying:

Number 1, don't lump me into being a "lazy" hunter or gun owner.
Number 2, I understand the importance of the NRA, SCI, and all other organizations fighting for our rights and animals.
Number 3, I don't care how bad of mood you're in for fighting for your beliefs and organizations.  I've done plenty of that myself and appreciate your efforts.

I'm actually fairly informed about most issues like this.  From a personal standpoint, I'd much rather the SCI efforts be focused on predator control issues and dwindling deer and moose numbers in the NC and NE parts of the state. AGAIN, WDFW CAN NOT EFFECTIVELY MANAGE THE PREDATORS NOR UNGULATES THEY ALREADY HAVE, so why would one think they'd be able to be able to manage and sustain a healthy pronghorn population in the long run?  These are just straight forward issues I personally find concerning.

Again, thank you for your dedicated efforts with this project, whether I agree or not.  I have seen and taken pictures of lopes in South Tonasket, outside Riverside, outside Omak, North of Monse, Northwest of Brewster, and throughout Douglas, Grant, and Benton counties.  Seems they might be here for a while.

Perhaps we will find out soon enough as to why this state has mismanaged its resources? The reveal for the lawsuit should be happening pretty soon.

https://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,234564.0.html

[Oh Mah]

QUOTE; MTNMULEY


I'm actually fairly informed about most issues like this.  From a personal standpoint, I'd much rather the SCI efforts be focused on predator control issues and dwindling deer and moose numbers in the NC and NE parts of the state. AGAIN, WDFW CAN NOT EFFECTIVELY MANAGE THE PREDATORS NOR UNGULATES THEY ALREADY HAVE, so why would one think they'd be able to be able to manage and sustain a healthy pronghorn population in the long run?  These are just straight forward issues I personally find concerning.


No offense but i feel you should re-read his post.WDFW wanted to be involved so they were ALLOWED to be involved but they are not MANAGING this they are only involved.

[Bushcraft]

I'm surprised at all the support for SCI putting in all the time and effort to transplant lopes to the Yak Rez. Do you guys have hopes they will move off rez and hope WDFW will invest time, money, and resources to making an eventual season? WDFW can't effectively manage the game they have nowdays. I certainly don't like the idea of my money donated to SCI going to fund projects for the Yak Rez. What have they done to help us manage any game or bring in animals on off rez lands, besides over harvest animals on "ceded" ground? Again, just curious for all this support.......

No offense, but I'm really having to bite my tongue when it comes to responding to this uninformed comment.  Particularly when I'm in a bad mood after spending a couple days in Olympia fighting the anti-gun crowd and see hardly anyone showing up to help.  I've said it before and I'll say it again. Firearm owners are incredibly lazy. Lot's of bitching and almost no engagement when the chips are down. Hunters as a whole are even lazier. It's pathetic and hugely frustrating for those of us that are pouring a TON of time, energy and money into the fight.  Okay...rant over.


A brief history of SCI's antelope reintroduction efforts:

- We wanted to reintroduce antelope to their historical ranges in Washington State in an effort to improve biodiversity and eventually have another huntable species in this state.

- WDFW was adamantly oppossed to the reintroduction of a historically native species, to the point that we were warned that severe prosecution of anyone attempting to do so would happen.

- We determined that it was illegal to bring antelope into Washington lands, but not "sovereign" lands of the tribes.

- We approached the tribes and began a dialog with them, which ultimately resulted in a good working partnership with them and their biologists that helped in turn pave the way for good relationships with biologists in other states.  (As an aside, the best biologists in this state work for the tribes!)

- We had ZERO help from WDFW in this regard, in fact the convoy of the first reintroduction was stopped by a WSP roadblock. Because the antelope were with tribal members and destined for tribals lands, we were able to essentially flip them the bird and drive on and complete that initial translocation.

- The first sets of antelope were affixed with radio collars - reasonably cost effective technology for the time, that allowed us to keep loose tabs on them as they spread out in the Spring, Summer and Fall to areas far outside the Rezervation boundaries.  They tend to band up in the winter and for whatever reason  lot of them move back onto the Rez.

- With follow-on reintroductions, we paid for and equipped the antelope with GPS collars, thereby helping keep much closer tabs on their whereabouts. 3 pings a day.

- Because they are here - hopefully to stay, and seem to be growing and spreading around the state outside of the Rez in healthy sustainable numbers with continued injections of new DNA, WDFW has finally accepted that they need to be involved and are working with us in the management and protection of the species.

- As antelope spread well beyond the boundaries of the Yakima and Colville reservation boundaries, we need to work with landowners and convince them that having antelope on the landscape again is a good thing. Outside of the rare hard-case, they have been very supportive.

I hope this brief explanation helps clear up the who/what/where/when/why it is important to support SCI in our hunter advocacy and wildlife conservation efforts.  This is the tip of the iceberg of what we do for hunters and wildlife.

No offense to other conservation org's, (I belong to and support a laundry list of them) but I would encourage people to join SCI before joining or donating to any other organization.

First - NRA, they are the big dog in the fight. Damn hard to hunt if you can't own/use a firearm.
Second - SCI, we are the 800 lb. gorilla with massive political influence at the local, state, national, and international level.  It's in our logo, but we are literally FIRST FOR HUNTERS!  Join us...there is strength in numbers!

Third...the critter club of your choice. Like to hunt elk? Join RMEF. Like to hunt ducks? Join a waterfowl organization like DU, Delta Waterfowl or Washington Waterfowlers. Like to hunt Sheep...join WSF. Etc.

Please join and get involved in this order.

Thank you.

Allen

Let me start by saying:

Number 1, don't lump me into being a "lazy" hunter or gun owner.
Number 2, I understand the importance of the NRA, SCI, and all other organizations fighting for our rights and animals.
Number 3, I don't care how bad of mood you're in for fighting for your beliefs and organizations.  I've done plenty of that myself and appreciate your efforts.

I'm actually fairly informed about most issues like this.  From a personal standpoint, I'd much rather the SCI efforts be focused on predator control issues and dwindling deer and moose numbers in the NC and NE parts of the state. AGAIN, WDFW CAN NOT EFFECTIVELY MANAGE THE PREDATORS NOR UNGULATES THEY ALREADY HAVE, so why would one think they'd be able to be able to manage and sustain a healthy pronghorn population in the long run?  These are just straight forward issues I personally find concerning.

Again, thank you for your dedicated efforts with this project, whether I agree or not.  I have seen and taken pictures of lopes in South Tonasket, outside Riverside, outside Omak, North of Monse, Northwest of Brewster, and throughout Douglas, Grant, and Benton counties.  Seems they might be here for a while.

1. I didn't. But a question if I may...Were you in Olympia earlier this week having face-to-face conversations with our legislators trying to prevent further infringements on our 2A rights and/or discussing hunting related bills with them? If so, thank you. If not, I rest my case.

2.  Thank you.

3a.  That's fine. As a fact-based guy I wouldn't presume to have anyone care about my feelings.

3b. Thank you.  Please get involved in a local chapter. We/they need your help!  There are lots of projects that need additional volunteers.

4.  I can assure you that SCI is at the forefront of pressuring the predator management issue(s) at the local, state and federal levels.  Nothing against them, but name another critter-club or hunting organization that's doing 1/20th of what we are doing in that realm...and then ask them why they aren't doing more to help. (Answer: They aren't hunting advocacy organizations.  They are essentially habitat organizations and as 501c3 .orgs they are largely prevented from applying political influence.)   

[Bushcraft]

QUOTE; MTNMULEY


I'm actually fairly informed about most issues like this.  From a personal standpoint, I'd much rather the SCI efforts be focused on predator control issues and dwindling deer and moose numbers in the NC and NE parts of the state. AGAIN, WDFW CAN NOT EFFECTIVELY MANAGE THE PREDATORS NOR UNGULATES THEY ALREADY HAVE, so why would one think they'd be able to be able to manage and sustain a healthy pronghorn population in the long run?  These are just straight forward issues I personally find concerning.


No offense but i feel you should re-read his post.WDFW wanted to be involved so they were ALLOWED to be involved but they are not MANAGING this they are only involved.

Slight clarification...since the antelope are here now and exist well outside the boundaries of the reservations for a significant part of the year, they are now under the management mandate of WDFW as a non-game animal.  They are very helpful now and we absolutely welcome them to the table.

Our goal is to turn antelope  into a game animal.

[MtnMuley]

I'm surprised at all the support for SCI putting in all the time and effort to transplant lopes to the Yak Rez. Do you guys have hopes they will move off rez and hope WDFW will invest time, money, and resources to making an eventual season? WDFW can't effectively manage the game they have nowdays. I certainly don't like the idea of my money donated to SCI going to fund projects for the Yak Rez. What have they done to help us manage any game or bring in animals on off rez lands, besides over harvest animals on "ceded" ground? Again, just curious for all this support.......

No offense, but I'm really having to bite my tongue when it comes to responding to this uninformed comment.  Particularly when I'm in a bad mood after spending a couple days in Olympia fighting the anti-gun crowd and see hardly anyone showing up to help.  I've said it before and I'll say it again. Firearm owners are incredibly lazy. Lot's of bitching and almost no engagement when the chips are down. Hunters as a whole are even lazier. It's pathetic and hugely frustrating for those of us that are pouring a TON of time, energy and money into the fight.  Okay...rant over.


A brief history of SCI's antelope reintroduction efforts:

- We wanted to reintroduce antelope to their historical ranges in Washington State in an effort to improve biodiversity and eventually have another huntable species in this state.

- WDFW was adamantly oppossed to the reintroduction of a historically native species, to the point that we were warned that severe prosecution of anyone attempting to do so would happen.

- We determined that it was illegal to bring antelope into Washington lands, but not "sovereign" lands of the tribes.

- We approached the tribes and began a dialog with them, which ultimately resulted in a good working partnership with them and their biologists that helped in turn pave the way for good relationships with biologists in other states.  (As an aside, the best biologists in this state work for the tribes!)

- We had ZERO help from WDFW in this regard, in fact the convoy of the first reintroduction was stopped by a WSP roadblock. Because the antelope were with tribal members and destined for tribals lands, we were able to essentially flip them the bird and drive on and complete that initial translocation.

- The first sets of antelope were affixed with radio collars - reasonably cost effective technology for the time, that allowed us to keep loose tabs on them as they spread out in the Spring, Summer and Fall to areas far outside the Rezervation boundaries.  They tend to band up in the winter and for whatever reason  lot of them move back onto the Rez.

- With follow-on reintroductions, we paid for and equipped the antelope with GPS collars, thereby helping keep much closer tabs on their whereabouts. 3 pings a day.

- Because they are here - hopefully to stay, and seem to be growing and spreading around the state outside of the Rez in healthy sustainable numbers with continued injections of new DNA, WDFW has finally accepted that they need to be involved and are working with us in the management and protection of the species.

- As antelope spread well beyond the boundaries of the Yakima and Colville reservation boundaries, we need to work with landowners and convince them that having antelope on the landscape again is a good thing. Outside of the rare hard-case, they have been very supportive.

I hope this brief explanation helps clear up the who/what/where/when/why it is important to support SCI in our hunter advocacy and wildlife conservation efforts.  This is the tip of the iceberg of what we do for hunters and wildlife.

No offense to other conservation org's, (I belong to and support a laundry list of them) but I would encourage people to join SCI before joining or donating to any other organization.

First - NRA, they are the big dog in the fight. Damn hard to hunt if you can't own/use a firearm.
Second - SCI, we are the 800 lb. gorilla with massive political influence at the local, state, national, and international level.  It's in our logo, but we are literally FIRST FOR HUNTERS!  Join us...there is strength in numbers!

Third...the critter club of your choice. Like to hunt elk? Join RMEF. Like to hunt ducks? Join a waterfowl organization like DU, Delta Waterfowl or Washington Waterfowlers. Like to hunt Sheep...join WSF. Etc.

Please join and get involved in this order.

Thank you.

Allen

Let me start by saying:

Number 1, don't lump me into being a "lazy" hunter or gun owner.
Number 2, I understand the importance of the NRA, SCI, and all other organizations fighting for our rights and animals.
Number 3, I don't care how bad of mood you're in for fighting for your beliefs and organizations.  I've done plenty of that myself and appreciate your efforts.

I'm actually fairly informed about most issues like this.  From a personal standpoint, I'd much rather the SCI efforts be focused on predator control issues and dwindling deer and moose numbers in the NC and NE parts of the state. AGAIN, WDFW CAN NOT EFFECTIVELY MANAGE THE PREDATORS NOR UNGULATES THEY ALREADY HAVE, so why would one think they'd be able to be able to manage and sustain a healthy pronghorn population in the long run?  These are just straight forward issues I personally find concerning.

Again, thank you for your dedicated efforts with this project, whether I agree or not.  I have seen and taken pictures of lopes in South Tonasket, outside Riverside, outside Omak, North of Monse, Northwest of Brewster, and throughout Douglas, Grant, and Benton counties.  Seems they might be here for a while.

1. I didn't. But a question if I may...Were you in Olympia earlier this week having face-to-face conversations with our legislators trying to prevent further infringements on our 2A rights and/or discussing hunting related bills with them? If so, thank you. If not, I rest my case.

2.  Thank you.

3a.  That's fine. As a fact-based guy I wouldn't presume to have anyone care about my feelings.

3b. Thank you.  Please get involved in a local chapter. We/they need your help!  There are lots of projects that need additional volunteers.

4.  I can assure you that SCI is at the forefront of pressuring the predator management issue(s) at the local, state and federal levels.  Nothing against them, but name another critter-club or hunting organization that's doing 1/20th of what we are doing in that realm...and then ask them why they aren't doing more to help. (Answer: They aren't hunting advocacy organizations.  They are essentially habitat organizations and as 501c3 .orgs they are largely prevented from applying political influence.)

RE: 1. I was not in Olympia, nor have I seen you in Olympia or other parts of the state when I've attended meetings.  No sense resting your case. If you want a pat on the back, I'll happily give you one.  Again, I appreciate your efforts and time.

RE: 3b.  I am and have been involved with several groups and volunteer my time.

Again, nothing personal against you or SCI, just a couple concerns I had.

[Oh Mah]

Yes i understand that,So their management is basically not allowing hunting of them.What time or energy they put into porcupines off rez. is technically the same with the antelope.Right?So for someone to make the statement above about the management capabilities to manage these antelope of the WDFW is off base. 

I am glad that all these groups are working together,It is best for the wildlife of this state.

[bobcat]

Slight clarification...since the antelope are here now and exist well outside the boundaries of the reservations for a significant part of the year, they are now under the management mandate of WDFW as a non-game animal.  They are very helpful now and we absolutely welcome them to the table.

Our goal is to turn antelope  into a game animal.

The WDFW says they ARE classified as a game animal.

From page 98 of the 2015-2021 Game Management Plan:



https://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01676/wdfw01676.pdf

[Bob33]

Slight clarification...since the antelope are here now and exist well outside the boundaries of the reservations for a significant part of the year, they are now under the management mandate of WDFW as a non-game animal.  They are very helpful now and we absolutely welcome them to the table.

Our goal is to turn antelope  into a game animal.

The WDFW says they ARE classified as a game animal.

From page 98 of the 2015-2021 Game Management Plan:



https://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01676/wdfw01676.pdf

Yes that's technically correct. Pronghorns are a (currently) non-huntable game animal.

https://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=220-400-020

https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.08.010
 "Game animals" means wild animals that shall not be hunted except as authorized by the commission.

[Bushcraft]

Slight clarification...since the antelope are here now and exist well outside the boundaries of the reservations for a significant part of the year, they are now under the management mandate of WDFW as a non-game animal.  They are very helpful now and we absolutely welcome them to the table.

Our goal is to turn antelope  into a game animal.

The WDFW says they ARE classified as a game animal.

Sorry, I misspoke.  I meant "non-game" in the sense that they are not considered to have a huntable population yet.  I should have been clearer.

[longashes]

Saw about 30 last weekend just outside of Sprague ...

[Ridgerunner]

I thought the thread about the reintroduction history was a fascinating insight into how the department operates now.  Completely opposed to a native species being reintroduced yet opened their arms to the nonnative fury devils that are now in our state.  I don't think antelope had enough $$$$$ attached to them. 

[Special T]

I thought the thread about the reintroduction history was a fascinating insight into how the department operates now.  Completely opposed to a native species being reintroduced yet opened their arms to the nonnative fury devils that are now in our state.  I don't think antelope had enough $$$$$ attached to them.

We also know that the reintroduction of Fishers is an important one that they have promoted as well.

[MtnMuley]

Perhaps the loss of the mountain caribou opened up door for lopes.........