Free: Contests & Raffles.
i wouldn’t say no one is shooting deer that far. Most cant/won’t shoot deer that far. There are many reasons for wanting that extra performance.
Quote from: jasnt on April 16, 2019, 02:09:26 PMi wouldn’t say no one is shooting deer that far. Most cant/won’t shoot deer that far. There are many reasons for wanting that extra performance.Yes I am sure there is some jerkwad that will pot shot at any range. But even 600 is too far for those rounds. They suffer from burnout and drop/get pushed around too much.
Yorken loaded his .270AR for an impact test with the following specs. Field and Stream disputed the 1000 ft lb to ethically kill a deer a few years back claiming they had many quick kills with 500 ft lb at impact. 117gr Hammer Hunter .167bc (G7)- Muzzle velocity 2732 fpsHits the 500lb mark at roughly 550 yards. I know a few people on here who could make that shot center shoulder without problems. Is this a personal opinion based on your limits and experience, or am I missing something?
Yes I am sure there is some jerkwad that will pot shot at any range. But even 600 is too far for those rounds. They suffer from burnout and drop/get pushed around too much.
The problem is wind drift, not ability. No one here can predict small wind gusts at that range. I own a 6.8 upper but a wally world $250 308 will kick the crap out of it at that range. These 6.x bullets in the AR run out of gas and get pushed around too easily.
Quote from: konradcountry on April 16, 2019, 08:11:36 PMThe problem is wind drift, not ability. No one here can predict small wind gusts at that range. I own a 6.8 upper but a wally world $250 308 will kick the crap out of it at that range. These 6.x bullets in the AR run out of gas and get pushed around too easily.A little practice and the right loads make a big difference. If you're shooting 115gr factory loads in the 6.8 SPC then yes, the wind is going to beat you up pretty bad. Shoot that same bullet faster or a bullet with a higher BC at the same velocity and you'll start to see where something like the 270 AR has a pretty clear advantage.
JDhasty, is that you? This sounds like a comment that's based on more opinion than fact or first hand experience. If I'm wrong, please correct me. There are a lot of folks who consider 5-600 yards medium range and have the skill to back that up. It sounds like those ranges are outside of your comfort/skill zone, so it's good that you're at least willing to acknowledge that.
Like I said it runs out of gas and get pushed around too easily. So you might take it out and hit steel at 600. Right, good job. But that's not the point. The point is that a small gust of wind can push that bullet and knock the teeth out of the deer or gut shot it. It's too vulnerable to wind at that range and skill doesn't change that. I'm not the first person to point this out. The drift is actually worse than the 223https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015/04/04/not-so-special-a-critical-view-of-the-6-8mm-spc/You can't treat these rounds like they are full rifle rounds. They are in-between and this shows up in wind drift. Again I have one downstairs. But it's not a 600 yard deer rifle. Would be fine for combat at 600 because at that range any hit is a success.
You're making a judgment based on the experience you have which is based on the ballistically inferior 6.8 SPC. Those of us (a relatively small number) who have considerable experience with the 270 AR can attest to the significant performance differences between the two. First hand experience will always trump theoretical data.
Quote from: yorketransport on April 16, 2019, 09:08:35 PMYou're making a judgment based on the experience you have which is based on the ballistically inferior 6.8 SPC. Those of us (a relatively small number) who have considerable experience with the 270 AR can attest to the significant performance differences between the two. First hand experience will always trump theoretical data. No I'm making a point based on the limits of this platform. First hand experience can not trump the physical limits of bullets or the AR-15. You can't break that AR-15 wall which is why there are trade-offs with all these bullets. Hunting at 5 or 600 yards is a can of worms in itself because of wind drift. But I would not use an AR-15 in that scenario because there are better tools for the job. Well that goes back to my first point which is that I wouldn't use a wildcat for typical hunting ranges since like I said the deer wouldn't notice the difference. Actually has nothing to do with 270 or 6.8 specifically. Wildcats come with their own trade-offs for better or worse.
Look into the 6.8 SPC. It shoots a .277" bullet and i have friends that love shooting deer with them. the only problem is they are relatively proprietary with uppers, lowers and mags.