collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Chemical Spraying  (Read 20162 times)

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 7347
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #105 on: February 15, 2019, 01:37:53 PM »
 :yike:  What!  Your kidding!  Government always said its totally safe!  So NY Cal and Wa all have science that agrees its bad??  41%?  Must be junk garbage fake news again.  Chemical manufactures have studies proof of its safety.  Hold on I have a weed growing by my well house.... :chuckle:
MAGA!  Again..

Offline Buckhunter24

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 2228
  • Location: Eatonville
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #106 on: February 16, 2019, 06:57:05 PM »
Smoke approval windows are limited and are getting smaller every year.
What are the rules for both the private timber companies, and State land on slash burns etc?   

Everyone keeps bringing up that we need to go back to burning cuts, but I'm guessing they aren't allowed to at least no wholesale.     


Edit to add; Plus it would seem like the # of clear cuts that need to be burned (for a particular landowner) would stack up in the Summer months (burn bans etc), and that would mean that tons of landowners would be burning during hunting seasons.  Including DNR, which would mean I could come on here and read about them screwing over your hunting season.   
 
*used "your" to get the point across, not pointing at anyone in particular.

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 7347
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #107 on: February 16, 2019, 07:04:08 PM »
Like other things in the world if it isn't allowed but demand is there they will find/develop a new hopefully better product.  But it is allowed and makes a HUGE amount of $$ which funds study and political lobby instead of product research to replace poor products, imop.
MAGA!  Again..

Offline WildlifeAssassin

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 342
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #108 on: April 23, 2019, 06:57:11 PM »
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-42860-0

Abstract:
Ancestral environmental exposures to a variety of factors and toxicants have been shown to promote the epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of adult onset disease. One of the most widely used agricultural pesticides worldwide is the herbicide glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine), commonly known as Roundup. There are an increasing number of conflicting reports regarding the direct exposure toxicity (risk) of glyphosate, but no rigorous investigations on the generational actions. The current study using a transient exposure of gestating F0 generation female rats found negligible impacts of glyphosate on the directly exposed F0 generation, or F1 generation offspring pathology. In contrast, dramatic increases in pathologies in the F2 generation grand-offspring, and F3 transgenerational great-grand-offspring were observed. The transgenerational pathologies observed include prostate disease, obesity, kidney disease, ovarian disease, and parturition (birth) abnormalities. Epigenetic analysis of the F1, F2 and F3 generation sperm identified differential DNA methylation regions (DMRs). A number of DMR associated genes were identified and previously shown to be involved in pathologies. Therefore, we propose glyphosate can induce the transgenerational inheritance of disease and germline (e.g. sperm) epimutations. Observations suggest the generational toxicology of glyphosate needs to be considered in the disease etiology of future generations.

Offline Gobble Doc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 2680
  • Location: Snohomish, WA
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #109 on: April 23, 2019, 08:21:37 PM »
Chemicals are bad. Adenosine triphosphate. Oh wait, it’s in every cell and our main energy source. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline WildlifeAssassin

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 342
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #110 on: April 24, 2019, 06:38:14 AM »
New survey in humans shows link between advanced liver disease and glyphosate

https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/latest-news/18897

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

My Wenaha bull by Centaur
[Today at 02:22:16 PM]


Pouge unit help by Buzzsaw461
[Today at 02:14:36 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by huntnphool
[Today at 01:19:05 PM]


What are some good 12 ga factory loads for predators? by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 11:33:03 AM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by ganghis
[Today at 10:04:09 AM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by Sundance
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Shooter4
[Today at 08:10:30 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:06:15 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 07:59:15 AM]


New scope or not? by Sneaky
[Today at 07:02:05 AM]


Making memories by boneaddict
[Today at 06:17:16 AM]


Question about hunting wilderness areas by Threewolves
[Today at 04:01:56 AM]


Called about Returned Alta Buck Permit by Shrimper
[Yesterday at 10:17:51 PM]


Idaho unit 10A by Naches Sportsman
[Yesterday at 08:44:27 PM]


Any MT deer updates? by Britt-dog
[Yesterday at 08:32:50 PM]


Grizzly? by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 07:38:21 PM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by Stein
[Yesterday at 07:35:27 PM]


Cash Poor/Equity Rich And Don't Want To Refinance by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 07:13:04 PM]


Palouse buck deer by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 06:27:11 PM]


What pond creature am I dealing with here? by Barehunter
[Yesterday at 06:16:30 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal