Free: Contests & Raffles.
"Right or wrong, The plan was never to manage the heard, the plan was to completely remove them from the ecosystem and its been that way for at least 20 years...."Agreed.A terrible thing.And the park service should be but isn't ashamed.
I agree that this plan is the best answer to a very bad situation the park service as created.Glad it is going down this way rather than shot from the air and leaving them to rot.You can call it a cull. By definition a cull doesn't remove all animals.An extermination does.The park service already has the authority to have emergency hunts.It doesn't take an act of congress.They are doing it now. And could have done this long ago.The fact is they could have used other creative methods to manage wildlife.As they are doing now. Because of public outcry.I suspect many are just antihunting, and allowed the problem to get large enough that it could not be handled by hunting.But I'm glad there are allot of hunters willing to help the park service exterminate the goats![/Quote from: sagemd on June 04, 2020, 03:15:05 PMI agree that this plan is the best answer to a very bad situation the park service as created.Glad it is going down this way rather than shot from the air and leaving them to rot.You can call it a cull. By definition a cull doesn't remove all animals.An extermination does.The park service already has the authority to have emergency hunts.It doesn't take an act of congress.They are doing it now. And could have done this long ago.The fact is they could have used other creative methods to manage wildlife.As they are doing now. Because of public outcry.I suspect many are just antihunting, and allowed the problem to get large enough that it could not be handled by hunting.But I'm glad there are allot of hunters willing to help the park service exterminate the goats! I agree. I was on the very first relocation project. It was a very cool experience, and it would have been great to see all the goats moved, but deep down, I was pretty sure it would never see season 3 of the funded project. It’s very expensive and truth be told, there were going to areas that were too extreme. This project isn’t perfect, but I think having hunters harvest the goats, realizing it more of a cull is better than having federal fish and wildlife sharp shooters kill them from helicopters and let em lay.
I agree that this plan is the best answer to a very bad situation the park service as created.Glad it is going down this way rather than shot from the air and leaving them to rot.You can call it a cull. By definition a cull doesn't remove all animals.An extermination does.The park service already has the authority to have emergency hunts.It doesn't take an act of congress.They are doing it now. And could have done this long ago.The fact is they could have used other creative methods to manage wildlife.As they are doing now. Because of public outcry.I suspect many are just antihunting, and allowed the problem to get large enough that it could not be handled by hunting.But I'm glad there are allot of hunters willing to help the park service exterminate the goats! I agree. I was on the very first relocation project. It was a very cool experience, and it would have been great to see all the goats moved, but deep down, I was pretty sure it would never see season 3 of the funded project. It’s very expensive and truth be told, there were going to areas that were too extreme. This project isn’t perfect, but I think having hunters harvest the goats, realizing it more of a cull is better than having federal fish and wildlife sharp shooters kill them from helicopters and let em lay.
Quote from: luvmystang67 on June 03, 2020, 08:20:37 AMI did send Dr Happe a thank you, even though we were not selected. It is the most impressed I've been with a government employee in a while.Ditto
I did send Dr Happe a thank you, even though we were not selected. It is the most impressed I've been with a government employee in a while.
I wish they would have made each group show up for a one day competition on all aspects of this hunt. Although I'm sure there were A LOT of super qualified teams, I will never believe there were 21 better qualified (Every Aspect) for this hunt that ours with the criteria given.
Quote from: MtnMuley on June 01, 2020, 11:54:03 AMI wish they would have made each group show up for a one day competition on all aspects of this hunt. Although I'm sure there were A LOT of super qualified teams, I will never believe there were 21 better qualified (Every Aspect) for this hunt that ours with the criteria given. I don't know you or your team, and your team might have been BOMB, but as for the individual competitors in said "one-day competition on all aspects of this hunt," I'd bet a whole lot of money on Michael Blanchard smoking everybody: Third place in Best Ranger Competition https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2016/04/17/nco-and-officer-duo-claims-title-of-best-ranger-2016/; beat in said competition by Robert Killian, Spartan OCR world champion, https://life.spartan.com/post/spartan-robert-killian; and killer of dead-of-winter mountain goats on Kodiak Is. And I'll guess he gets to put more shots down-range per week than most all of us, along with some of the world's best armors and trainers helping him shoot small.Maybe I have a man-crush on a dude I've never met, but dang, he has credentials for that goat removal project. He might even wear a cape!
I mean, he's cool I guess. Doesn't matter how tough he is though because he still suffers from little brother complex which means if I come at him he folds into the fetal position.
Quote from: Karl Blanchard on June 07, 2020, 10:34:19 AMI mean, he's cool I guess. Doesn't matter how tough he is though because he still suffers from little brother complex which means if I come at him he folds into the fetal position.As a little brother, I know the competitive drive to "best" my older brother. My money is still on Michael.
Without going back and reading 20 pages... has a single Hunt WA member been selected?