collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Minimum COAL  (Read 3288 times)

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13159
  • Location: Arlington
Minimum COAL
« on: September 23, 2020, 11:40:45 AM »
Quick question for experienced reloaders, I am doing a seating depth test starting at the maximum magazine length and going shorter from there in .003 increments.  The max mag length is well under touch or jam length.  55.0 H4350 behind 168 TSX, so closer to min load than max (55.0-59.0 from Hodgdon, but for wrong bullet as Barnes doesn't have H4350 data)

I know that as I go shorter, the pressure will go up and the velocity will go up (assuming everything else stays the same).  After the first round of testing, I'm showing a definite improvement in group sizes as I go smaller, so I want to go down several more steps to see if I can tighten them up more and where a nice band is.

My question is whether there is a safety issue with going too short?  I'm checking to make sure the load isn't compressed and would stop if I couldn't hear powder freely shaking in the loaded round.  My concern is that even though it's a mild load, I don't have any way to understand if the increase in pressure will go above SAAMI or not or if it's a minor or major change in pressure as I go shorter.

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8106
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2020, 11:47:37 AM »
It should be a pretty minor change in pressure with shortening coal. With a low pressure load range i would not be concerned at all. Just keep an eye out for any pressure indicators.

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 9012
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2020, 12:13:47 PM »
That's a real mild load (WSM?) I think you'd have a real hard time hitting pressure with a lightweight Barnes and that charge.
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13159
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2020, 12:17:28 PM »
That's a real mild load (WSM?) I think you'd have a real hard time hitting pressure with a lightweight Barnes and that charge.

30-06, forgot to mention.  Yeah, it's pretty light but was the most accurate in my load testing.  I went all the way up until the primer started to bulge and this was the clear winner.  I had a decent velocity node around 57, but not as good and nothing exciting above that.

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 9012
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2020, 12:26:27 PM »
Sorry I "jumped" to conclusions thinking it was a short action COAL problem.
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13159
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2020, 12:28:09 PM »
No problem, I assume most people shoot 30-06 I guess.   :chuckle:

Offline CaNINE

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 1437
  • Location: Gig Harbor
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2020, 01:30:29 PM »
Stein - 0.003 is a pretty small increment to work with, let alone maintain on a reliable/repeatable basis.  I suggest working with a minimal increment of 0.010 when testing seating depth sensitivity.  :twocents:
The lazy do not roast any game, but the diligent feed on the riches of the hunt.

Proverbs 12:27

Offline Mtnwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 2399
  • Location: Selah
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2020, 01:33:47 PM »
Stein - 0.003 is a pretty small increment to work with, let alone maintain on a reliable/repeatable basis.  I suggest working with a minimal increment of 0.010 when testing seating depth sensitivity.  :twocents:

Barnes recommends starting at .050 and working in .025 increments I believe




Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2020, 01:41:11 PM »
You should be recording velocity data at this time as a spike in velocity will correspond with a spike in pressure.  Velocity node and accuracy go hand in hand.

Offline NWShooter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 239
  • Location: Oregon
  • Groups: RockyMountain Elk foundation, Mule Deer Foundation, NRA.
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2020, 03:06:50 PM »
Stein - 0.003 is a pretty small increment to work with, let alone maintain on a reliable/repeatable basis.  I suggest working with a minimal increment of 0.010 when testing seating depth sensitivity.  :twocents:

I agree. I would do it in .020 increments. Then fine tune from there.
A empty vessel makes the most noise.

"Every normal man must be tempted , at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats."

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6542
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2020, 07:08:02 PM »
I agree.  .003 is way too small     I use .03 and then fine tune in .005” increments.  You have to test about 75 different seating depths to even come close to a pressure issue with that load if not more!start at mag length, load 3-5, go .030” deeper load 3-5 more.  Continue that till your jumping more than .150.   Choose the best group.   Test 1gr on each side of your powder load in 1% increments.   Choose the best es and then fine tune your seating depth in .005” increments    Then if you still think you can do better switch to Berger bullets 🤪
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5616
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2020, 07:44:04 PM »
I go .010 to .035 in .005 steps.   If nothing good use .060, .090, .0120 to see if close then refine .005 steps. 

Online mountainman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 6166
  • Location: Wenatchee, Wa
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2020, 09:19:51 PM »
I go .010 to .035 in .005 steps.   If nothing good use .060, .090, .0120 to see if close then refine .005 steps. 
This👆
That Sword is more important than the Shield!

Offline TheArmoredShop

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Tracker
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2019
  • Posts: 35
  • Location: Longview
  • Not here for a long time, just a good time
  • Groups: NRA, GOA
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2020, 08:00:36 AM »
You can really push a casing a long ways before you see stress. I was blowing holes in my primers of my 300 winmag at 85 grains of H1000 highly compressed load before I backed off 1% to 83.7 still compressed but everything held fine. Just go slow. Once you start flattening primers or blowing out the primer, you’re good. Primers are usually the first thing you see other than an extractor mark

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 9012
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: Minimum COAL
« Reply #14 on: October 13, 2020, 09:11:13 AM »
How many firings you get at 5 grains over book max?
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Fishin' with First-Timers by HntnFsh
[Today at 04:16:36 PM]


Quality deer hunt by HntnFsh
[Today at 04:12:04 PM]


Any buck clarification by Rugergunsite308
[Today at 04:04:47 PM]


More than one shotgun? by goldenhtr
[Today at 03:29:15 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by HikerHunter
[Today at 02:22:47 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Today at 01:29:56 PM]


How do you scout for small game? by ghosthunter
[Today at 01:15:23 PM]


Share your out of state experience by andrew_in_idaho
[Today at 12:17:07 PM]


Opening Day Ducks - Why Surface Drives by Delta Duckman
[Today at 12:11:55 PM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:31:56 AM]


Where to find hunting mentors/etc in western wa (archery) by ASHQUACK
[Today at 10:31:49 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by highside74
[Today at 10:02:19 AM]


North Idaho 2025 Rifle Bull by Gentrys
[Today at 10:02:07 AM]


Willipa Hills Antlerless tag by blackveltbowhunter
[Today at 09:28:03 AM]


CB Radio Hints and Tips, Installing guidance. by Rat44
[Today at 09:10:37 AM]


Drew Pogue Quality by jstone
[Today at 07:35:57 AM]


New Decoys by Shannon
[Today at 07:30:45 AM]


As He Lay by redi
[Today at 12:38:27 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by blackveltbowhunter
[Yesterday at 11:53:36 PM]


Two stories for you (no deer were harmed in the making) by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:12:34 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal