collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Desert GMU 290 vs Deer area 5382 in GMU 382  (Read 4337 times)

Offline UN4GVN60

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2020
  • Posts: 1
  • Location: Chehalis
Desert GMU 290 vs Deer area 5382 in GMU 382
« on: December 17, 2020, 07:50:09 AM »
I have 15 points putting in for the muzzleloader tag for GMU 290 but after reading some of the post here I'm wondering if its worth all the hype. People are saying the deer are nocturnal and it's too hot and so on. So I'm wondering if maybe the draw for deer area 5382 might be a better choice. Hunting when its cooler and during the rut. Any thoughts or input would be greatly appreciated.

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31528
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: Desert GMU 290 vs Deer area 5382 in GMU 382
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2020, 08:42:06 AM »
Depends on the year. Sometime the rut here is done or mostly done by muzzle loader. Seems to fall between the end of modern and start of muzzle. If your looking for a bigger deer hands down stick to 290. The deer here are mensch legs and it takes a pretty rare deer to break 160 around here. Most shot are probably 120/140 for nicer bucks. It can be a great hunt if the rut is still on. I don’t know that chunk of ground but if cats are not working it to hard. Should be some deer around.
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline Limhangerslayer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 1664
  • Location: Dryside
Re: Desert GMU 290 vs Deer area 5382 in GMU 382
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2020, 09:01:36 AM »
Not really getting your question?  Put  in for both, highly doubt you’ll draw both of them in the same year :dunno:

Online Mtnwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 2278
  • Location: Selah
Re: Desert GMU 290 vs Deer area 5382 in GMU 382
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2020, 09:10:28 AM »
 :yeah: 2 different categories, 290 is a Quality tag the other is a Buck Deer tag. You can apply for both and drawing 1 doesn't burn your points for the other.

Offline highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5207
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: Desert GMU 290 vs Deer area 5382 in GMU 382
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2020, 09:20:13 AM »
Unless you are like me a few years ago when I drew Desert and Ritzville archery in the same year.  :bash:

Offline Limhangerslayer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 1664
  • Location: Dryside
Re: Desert GMU 290 vs Deer area 5382 in GMU 382
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2020, 12:18:06 PM »
Unless you are like me a few years ago when I drew Desert and Ritzville archery in the same year.  :bash:
haha, that sucks!  Especially if you had a lot of points in both

Offline Mfowl

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 4396
  • Location: westside
Re: Desert GMU 290 vs Deer area 5382 in GMU 382
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2020, 02:11:49 PM »
I have 15 points putting in for the muzzleloader tag for GMU 290 but after reading some of the post here I'm wondering if its worth all the hype. People are saying the deer are nocturnal and it's too hot and so on. So I'm wondering if maybe the draw for deer area 5382 might be a better choice. Hunting when its cooler and during the rut. Any thoughts or input would be greatly appreciated.

I wouldn't burn 15 pts on Desert ML. Rifle yes, ML no.
Fish hard, hunt harder!

Offline millerwheeler

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 1492
  • Location: Spanaway
  • Get out and put some miles on those boots
Re: Desert GMU 290 vs Deer area 5382 in GMU 382
« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2020, 04:54:30 PM »
I think carpsniperg2 hit the nail on the head both units are much different depending on what your after I have hunted 382 my whole life and gotta agree

Offline ThurstonCokid

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2018
  • Posts: 757
  • Location: Olympia
  • Groups: NRA, RMEF
Re: Desert GMU 290 vs Deer area 5382 in GMU 382
« Reply #8 on: December 17, 2020, 07:33:00 PM »
I’d love to have the ML desert tag. But what do i  know


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline MerriamMagician

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 516
  • Location: Eastside
  • Success is the only option
Re: Desert GMU 290 vs Deer area 5382 in GMU 382
« Reply #9 on: December 23, 2020, 11:44:51 AM »
I don't know anything about deer area 5382, but the muzzy tag in gmu 290 honestly has some crappy dates in very early October. Not sure what the reasoning for having it so early in the year is with a primitive weapon while the rifle and archery tags for out there get to hunt the rut.  :dunno: The big bucks the unit is famous for still exist, but killing one outside the rut is a real chore.  :twocents:
Gobblers only, all jakes must walk

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by Kales15
[Today at 02:10:11 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Threewolves
[Today at 01:11:29 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 12:35:03 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Today at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Today at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Today at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Today at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Today at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Yesterday at 05:42:19 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 12:43:12 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal