collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: .22-250 vs .223  (Read 10416 times)

Offline Rob

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 4822
  • Location: Sandpoint ID
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #15 on: December 29, 2020, 08:59:39 AM »
I have whacked 3 pronghorn with a 22.250 at between 200 and 300 yards.  They did not even go one step.  One I actually thought that I missed one clean as it was completely gone from my sights after I pulled the trigger.  Turns out it had flipped over on it's back with all 4 legs sticking straight up to the sky!  Not too bad for a tiny little bullet.  I think I was shooting 55 grain v-max.
_______________________________________
Sit tall in the saddle, hold you head up high.
Keep your eyes fixed on where the trail meets the sky.
Live like you ain’t afraid to die.
Just sit back and enjoy your ride
  - Chris Ledoux

Offline overthefalls

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2020
  • Posts: 19
  • Location: Whatcom County
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2020, 09:13:19 AM »

Offline konradcountry

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 1013
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #17 on: December 29, 2020, 11:31:29 PM »
I'm voting 223.

Of course 22-250 has better specs for longer ranges.

But at those long ranges you have to dope anyways and the 22-250 needs a longer barrel.

I think you will practice more with 223.

Set the zero to 250 and you have a very flat shooting gun.

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18056
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #18 on: December 30, 2020, 12:17:23 AM »
Gotta go 22-250.

It way outclasses the 223.

The 223 only wins in being cheap to shoot.....   but staying home is even cheaper.
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38444
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #19 on: December 30, 2020, 04:54:28 AM »
I think your choice boils down to one question: Would you rather have a rifle that is cheaper to shoot or one that is better at longer ranges? Answer that question to yourself and then go buy a rifle!  :twocents:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline konradcountry

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 1013
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #20 on: December 30, 2020, 08:31:02 AM »
Gotta go 22-250.

It way outclasses the 223.

The 223 only wins in being cheap to shoot.....   but staying home is even cheaper.

Way outclasses? It's pretty much a tie to 300.

The 223 also wins on weight. You have to lug around a full sized 22-250 to get those velocities.

I could see a 22-250 in Eastern Wa for groundhog but I think just about anyone is better off with an AR for coyote.

Offline b23

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3308
  • Location: Spokane Wa.
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #21 on: December 30, 2020, 09:20:45 AM »
That graph doesn't show how or what they're comparing but if you take a box of factory Hornady 223 55gr Vmax and compare it to box of Hornady 22-250 55gr Vmax ammo it's definitely not a tie at 300.  With both being zeroed at 100 yards the 223 drops 11.1 and the 22-250 drops 7.8  At 200 they're relatively even but the further you get past that the more the extra horsepower shines.

I have both and like both a lot I'd hate to only be able to have one or the other.  For me it would come down to what I truly planned to use it for.  If it were a dedicated varmint/predator gun only the decision would be easy and I'd go 22-250 but if it was going to be a varmint/predator/fun all around shooting gun then I would likely go 223.  And as we gun folk like to say, when in doubt, get both.  :tup:

Offline The Big Game Hunter

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2013
  • Posts: 287
    • https://www.facebook.com/biggamehuntingadventures
    • Big Game Hunting Adventures
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #22 on: December 30, 2020, 09:50:35 AM »
You can read a detailed comparison of both cartridges (along with the .204 Ruger and .220 Swift) below.
https://thebiggamehuntingblog.com/22-250-vs-223-vs-204-ruger-vs-220-swift/

Offline konradcountry

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 1013
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #23 on: December 30, 2020, 10:07:44 AM »
That graph doesn't show how or what they're comparing but if you take a box of factory Hornady 223 55gr Vmax and compare it to box of Hornady 22-250 55gr Vmax ammo it's definitely not a tie at 300.  With both being zeroed at 100 yards the 223 drops 11.1 and the 22-250 drops 7.8  At 200 they're relatively even but the further you get past that the more the extra horsepower shines.

100 is too close of a zero for 223.

Zero at 250 and your 300 drop is only 3.7. At 100 that puts you only 2.5 high.

So you can hit a coyote sized target out to 300 without doping.

And as we gun folk like to say, when in doubt, get both.

I'm in the man of 3 guns camp.

Too many calibers leads to less time in the field.

Offline huntingfool7

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1722
  • Location: Puyallup, WA
  • Groups: huntingfool7
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #24 on: December 30, 2020, 10:26:12 AM »
Gotta go 22-250.

It way outclasses the 223.

The 223 only wins in being cheap to shoot.....   but staying home is even cheaper.

Way outclasses? It's pretty much a tie to 300.

The 223 also wins on weight. You have to lug around a full sized 22-250 to get those velocities.

I could see a 22-250 in Eastern Wa for groundhog but I think just about anyone is better off with an AR for coyote.

"It's pretty much a tie to 300". 

OP asked for recommendations out to 500.  If he said 300, most posts would understandably swing heavy to 223.  Posting up the handicap doesn't make the 223 the equal of the 22-250. 

So from what I gather from this post and some research the .22-250 is a faster round and better for long range. Will the .223 do decent out to 400 or 500 yards? How is the accuracy of the .223?

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11321
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #25 on: December 30, 2020, 11:17:02 AM »
most yote hunters are not taking shots over 200-300 yards.   Yeah, you will hear of the guy that whacks one occasionally at 500 or greater, but that is a small target that does not like to stand still for very long.  Not to mention, most people are calling these dogs in and like to shoot them up close and personal.  That is why some yote hunters carry a shotgun and a rifle to their stands. 

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2020, 11:52:45 AM »
I am fortunate in that 500 yards away my neighbor has sheep and goats so naturally I get random opportunity out to >600 yards.  I do not call here as I do not want them more educated than they think they are.  I have several 300+ kills and 3 500+ in less than the last year.  The rifle thats been handiest on those occasions has been my heavy 6.5.  I have not missed any, not risking shots unless the yote has become stationary.  Of the 500+yard dogs, one was sitting in the edge of the trees watching the sheep and both others stopped to hunch up for their last dump.   :bdid:

This being what it is, my heavy .243 is on duty until further notice and it is even more capable than my 6.5cm.  22-250 over 223 all day every day, Ive owned both.

Offline konradcountry

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 1013
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #27 on: December 30, 2020, 11:57:00 AM »

"It's pretty much a tie to 300". 

OP asked for recommendations out to 500.  If he said 300, most posts would understandably swing heavy to 223.  Posting up the handicap doesn't make the 223 the equal of the 22-250. 

I know what he said.

Out to 500 means doping the wind.

So you are already doing calculations and your horizontal is going to be a bigger issue.

It's not simply a matter of specs. I vote 223 for practical application. Feel free to disagree.

Offline Buzz2401

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1207
  • Location: Shelton
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #28 on: December 30, 2020, 12:02:00 PM »
The price of ammo shouldn't be in the discussion because for quality ammo they are almost identical in price.  Yes you can buy cheap fmj 223 ammo but if your hunting then you are probably gonna buy premium ammo.  And rifle weight doesn't mean much either since you are literally talking less then 1/2lb difference in actual rifle weight between the two.  I just find its a lot of pros for the 22-250 compared to only a couple miniscule pros for the 223

Offline Cougartail

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 3518
  • Location: Eastern Washington
Re: .22-250 vs .223
« Reply #29 on: December 30, 2020, 12:37:07 PM »
most yote hunters are not taking shots over 200-300 yards.   Yeah, you will hear of the guy that whacks one occasionally at 500 or greater, but that is a small target that does not like to stand still for very long.  Not to mention, most people are calling these dogs in and like to shoot them up close and personal.  That is why some yote hunters carry a shotgun and a rifle to their stands.

Stop confusing people with real world hunting. :chuckle:
If I need a permit and education to buy a firearm than women should need a permit and education  before getting an abortion.

Voting for Democrats is prima facie evidence you are a skirt wearing, low T, beta male. Do better.

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal