1705 5078

[MADMAX]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/big-victory-for-supporters-of-stricter-gun-laws-wa-legislature-approves-new-ammunition-limits/%3famp=1

[Russ McDonald]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/big-victory-for-supporters-of-stricter-gun-laws-wa-legislature-approves-new-ammunition-limits/%3famp=1

Has anyone read the newest revision.  It says no more than 12 rounds.  Sucks and a bunch of crap none the less.  Bill isn't signed yet and we can still own them.  Plenty of them being bought up.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

[buckfvr]

It's disgusting how corrupt our AG and majority of legislators are.

Treasonous bunch of chicken s**t morons.

[KFhunter]

■  Doesn't apply to me for various reasons, so none of the above.

[NRA4LIFE]

I'd like to see sales go through the roof in the next few months.  I'm going to do my part.

I hope those who voted for it realize they just became the greatest hi-cap magazine salesmen in state history.

[bigtex]

I lost all my magazines in a tragic boating mishap

The bill doesn't prohibit possession.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[bigtex]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/big-victory-for-supporters-of-stricter-gun-laws-wa-legislature-approves-new-ammunition-limits/%3famp=1

Has anyone read the newest revision.  It says no more than 12 rounds.  Sucks and a bunch of crap none the less.  Bill isn't signed yet and we can still own them.  Plenty of them being bought up.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

No it doesn't. The bill wasn't revised in the house.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[MADMAX]

I lost all my magazines in a tragic boating mishap

The bill doesn't prohibit possession.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[Russ McDonald]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/big-victory-for-supporters-of-stricter-gun-laws-wa-legislature-approves-new-ammunition-limits/%3famp=1

Has anyone read the newest revision.  It says no more than 12 rounds.  Sucks and a bunch of crap none the less.  Bill isn't signed yet and we can still own them.  Plenty of them being bought up.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

No it doesn't. The bill wasn't revised in the house.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

I went through yhe bill and it says 12 rounds or more not 10.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

[Dan-o]

@bigtex   

Or anyone else.

Am I correct in understanding that when California did this, they initially didn't ban ownership either.   But a couple years later came back and criminalized ownership.

Is that correct?

[bigtex]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/big-victory-for-supporters-of-stricter-gun-laws-wa-legislature-approves-new-ammunition-limits/%3famp=1

Has anyone read the newest revision.  It says no more than 12 rounds.  Sucks and a bunch of crap none the less.  Bill isn't signed yet and we can still own them.  Plenty of them being bought up.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

No it doesn't. The bill wasn't revised in the house.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

I went through yhe bill and it says 12 rounds or more not 10.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

According to the bill: "Large capacity magazine" means an ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds of ammunition"

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[Igor]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/big-victory-for-supporters-of-stricter-gun-laws-wa-legislature-approves-new-ammunition-limits/%3famp=1

Has anyone read the newest revision.  It says no more than 12 rounds.  Sucks and a bunch of crap none the less.  Bill isn't signed yet and we can still own them.  Plenty of them being bought up.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

No it doesn't. The bill wasn't revised in the house.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

I went through yhe bill and it says 12 rounds or more not 10.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

According to the bill: "Large capacity magazine" means an ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds of ammunition"

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

I haven't read the bill, but why is this so difficult ?

[buckfvr]

Why is what so difficult ?

[Russ McDonald]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/big-victory-for-supporters-of-stricter-gun-laws-wa-legislature-approves-new-ammunition-limits/%3famp=1

Has anyone read the newest revision.  It says no more than 12 rounds.  Sucks and a bunch of crap none the less.  Bill isn't signed yet and we can still own them.  Plenty of them being bought up.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

No it doesn't. The bill wasn't revised in the house.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

I went through yhe bill and it says 12 rounds or more not 10.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

According to the bill: "Large capacity magazine" means an ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds of ammunition"

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

There was another version of the bill that said 12 rounds not 10 so somewhere it was revised.  It isn't difficult so bot sure what your talking about Igor.  The bill is all BS.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

[Igor]

Why is what so difficult ?

One poster says the bill limits magazines to 10 rounds.  Another person says the bill limits magazines to 12 rounds.  I have not read the final bill as passed.  Is it 10 rounds, or is it 12 rounds ?