Is anybody suing the commission yet?

[buckfvr]

Them and the governor break RCW’s all the time with no lawsuits or consequences, why would this one be any different?

Constantly.  ferguson is as sleazy as they get and wont let anyone stand in the way of the agenda.  Not even voting.

[KFhunter]

@WWC  ??

Any insight here?

@saylean  what do you know?

I’ve spoke to several orgs. The consensus so far is that there is not interest to pursue for the majority of them, due to the broad ability of the commission. That is not all the responses I got, only some. Personally I think there should be a lawsuit due to them not following procedure etc. I’m still searching avenues on how to proceed with some sort of accountability.

Then it is *our* collective job to "encourage" the .orgs to pursue this with vigor, much like elk hunters did with RMEF over their initial neutrality stance regarding wolves.

[Special T]

WAC 220-101-020 Department description and authority. (1)
Throughout this chapter, "department" is used to mean the Washington
fish and wildlife commission and the Washington department of fish and
wildlife. The term department may also include the staff and employees
of the department of fish and wildlife, where indicated by context.
(2) The department of fish and wildlife is the agency to which
the legislature has delegated responsibility for preserving, protecting, perpetuating, and managing fish and wildlife in the lands and waters of the state, including offshore waters.


Im no lawyer but  what I would surmise is that when the levers of power are held by the animal rights crowd even a lead pipe cinch isnt a guarantee of success. Often times common sense seems to dictate these assumptions about what the WDFW should do.  While I agree that the intent isnt being meet taking that to court is a fools errand. The Animal rights crowd screwed us out of spring bear using precise technical maneuvering.  We either need to get a lot better at playing that game... or expand what we can do to thwart  these legalize attacks. Unfortunately sportsmen do not have a cadre of lawyers that are volunteering to  educate us on what to investigate data to organize or volunteer as a legal council on many issues. The conversations that Ive had with a few lawyers state that fighting the state to remedy an issue is a legal quagmire, and the only ones that are ultimately successful are the Tribes, and when they do so they get to skip straight to federal court. That is a huge advantage when you consider who controls the levers of power currently.  Surely we have many lawyers on here that could educate us, but I doubt they are going to out themselves the first time some one calls into question their motives or credentials.

I say this with all the love and respect for the individual nature of sportsmen, because I am one, you/we are extremally hard to lead and convince of a positive direction that we can all pull the line in one direction. I hear a lot of  "I would get involved IF..." with varying descriptions of reasons or excuses... Since we are hard to lead, just join an organization and forge forward. We all spend enough time on here to belong to an organization do a couple hours of research a week and report back, Right?


Perhaps some of you have not yet read the recent post WWC put up titled
Washington Hunters Urged To Get Involved In State Politics

https://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,270106.0.html

[7mmfan]

I'd support it. Unfortunately the way that is worded, they can say they don't have the data to prove that it is sustainable or healthy, which is what they stated as part of their decision.

I went to the Commissioners page and searched for the word "bear".  Not a single result.  I suspect if any of these folks were subject matter experts on black bears, it would be in their bios.

We have real subject matter experts that called for a black bear season.  People who study bears for a living.  They're highly educated and paid to do this.  Their word carries weight in the courtroom.  More weight than, say, a retired zoologist who has never worked on black bears in the wild.

I'm not saying that this would be easy, given that we have very leftist courts in WA.  But I do think it needs to be attempted... Ideally in eastern WA.

What shocks me is that there hasn't been any mention of a lawsuit.  I think a crowdfunded lawsuit could easily be fully financed.

Curtis

@WWC  ??

Any insight here?

@saylean  what do you know?

I’ve spoke to several orgs. The consensus so far is that there is not interest to pursue for the majority of them, due to the broad ability of the commission. That is not all the responses I got, only some. Personally I think there should be a lawsuit due to them not following procedure etc. I’m still searching avenues on how to proceed with some sort of accountability.

This is the issue. The wording of the mission statement, and the RCW wording of the game commissions roles and responsibilities are so broad and vague, that they can use virtually anything to wiggle out of legal repercussions based on that alone. Sayleans point about pinning it to them over breach of procedure (unconfirmed commissioners, biased appointment of commissioners, not properly representing all user groups with commissioner appointments, etc...) would really be the only way to move forward with a lawsuit that I see.

I would fully support a .org or whatever that made it their mission to go after the state, wdfw and the commission with legal suits, but I'd want to see a well thought out path forward before doing so.

[callturner]

For years we never had a spring bear season until the antis closed hound hunting. The wdfw never pushed for it untill the bears became a nuisance.  They have extended the season from September to August and for a while had the spring season. Im not sure if they pay professional hunters still to hunt for the timber company's. I know there used to be a spring season for the west side only. Bottom line is bears will populate and people will complain and they will look for answers.  WDFW is all union and they only worry about their jobs. Most don't care about the wildlife or the people. I know because I worked for them for a short time and saw how they treated people and what they cared about. I moved on and didn't look back.

[ctwiggs1]

Stop the bus. 

How is it that none of you suckers corrected my typo??

[jackelope]

Stop the bus. 

How is it that none of you suckers corrected my typo??

Normally I'd be all over that sort of thing, but after being called a grammar nazi or the like several dozen times, I stopped with all that.

[Mtnwalker]

Their is more importanter things to focus on hear then grammar

[Twispriver]

I'll cover today's lesson.

Then is not the same word as than and they are not interchangeable.
There, their and they're are also different words.
Our national boundary is a border not a boarder; and
Several elk together is a herd. I've got no clue what a hurd is.

[cem3434]

I'll donate to the cause if anyone can get the ball rolling.

[Caveman123]

I personally don’t care for spring bear hunting and quit putting in years ago, just have other things to do in the spring. However I would donate my time and money for this cause. Has anybody reached out to any “influencers” about getting organized? I’ve heard it mentioned in a few podcasts and saw lots of posts around the time of their decision. I just wonder if someone with a large following could get an organization to follow.

[hunter399]

I'm going to say.....
Go shoot a bear this fall ,like it's deer season.
I'll post a state harvest chart ,which I'm sure most don't really care.
The spring harvest of bear makes no difference to the sustainability of bear population. Of course WDFW would support a hunt that has no effect to bear population yet is a cash cow for the state. It's all about the 100 dollar bill y'all.
Which is our future as hunters,very little opportunities/success rate ,BIG MONEY 💰 cash cow,
For a tiny tiny tiny piece of the pie.


In this chart I've included 2021 HARVEST for bear and it shows our harvest is only about as high as it was with 1 tag.
2019 was the year two tags was available,our harvest rate is declining with a few more years of declining harvest they will say population is declining.

Bear are not the same as ungulate.....
Length from cub to mature animal takes a bit longer.

Anyway here is the chart ,read it anyway you like.
The chart really makes no difference,cause the Commission don't consider harvest rates sound science now.
If our harvest rate dips below 1500 we will be below what is was before the two tag was given in 2019.

I'd say hunt fall like it's a spring permit,hunt fall bear like it's deer season,don't let harvest fall below that 1500 mark.

[WWC]

We would love to have a lawyer or some one well versed in the law as an active part of our team. Animal Rights groups sue to prevent or delay an action. The cost and effectiveness is heavily tilted in the ARs favor. If you are interested in contributing your legal experience and advice, please feel free to PM us your contact information.

A lawsuit is just one avenue to facilitate change, and they are not a magic bullet. Big winds of change appear to be on the horizon. Read the Hunters Heritage Councils call to action on becoming politically involved.

[Skyvalhunter]

I cant say I believe the winds of change are in the hunters favor.

[Karl Blanchard]

Stop the bus. 

How is it that none of you suckers corrected my typo??

I was going to but opted to just silently judge you instead 

Hunter399, I think a big part of last years "lower" harvest was largely due to the crazy heat. I know the kids and I had big plans to stack bears last year but when the lows are in high 90's it really takes the wind out of your sails for hiking around dealing with bear meat