collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Washington Hunters’ Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Hunting Management  (Read 1797 times)

Offline Farmer72

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2021
  • Posts: 519
  • Location: Port Orchard, WA
I Just saw this study today when I was on the WDFW site. I dont remember it there before but might have missed it. I did a search and didnt find this posted on here (found a similar one but not as much info). As usual an interesting read and that the state sucks (My opinion). If it was already posted and I missed it feel free to delete or combine.

https://wdfw.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-08/WA%202022%20Hunter%20Report%202022%2007%2029.pdf

Offline highcountry_hunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 775
Re: Washington Hunters’ Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Hunting Management
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2023, 03:05:11 PM »
140 pages? Are there naked lady pictures throughout?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Alan K

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 3064
  • Location: Lewis County, WA
  • University of Idaho Alumni
Re: Washington Hunters’ Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Hunting Management
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2023, 05:26:49 PM »
Lots of graphs that boost the page count... About as expected, actually maybe slightly higher marks for WDFW than I'd have expected, but still pretty poor overall.

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4838
Re: Washington Hunters’ Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Hunting Management
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2023, 06:45:54 PM »
Your license dollars at work (?)  What was the budget for this? 

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1293
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: Washington Hunters’ Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Hunting Management
« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2023, 07:02:37 PM »
Did anyone on here participate in the survey back in June and July?

Offline Bullkllr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 5029
  • Location: Graham
Re: Washington Hunters’ Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Hunting Management
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2023, 07:21:38 PM »
I participated in this survey. I believe it was mentioned on here, but it didn't seem like many members were selected for the survey iirc.

Some of it seemed pretty straight forward.
Some I wondered why they were asking that? This one for example:
"Deer hunters were asked to rate the importance of five factors regarding the harvest management of deer:
Sustainable harvest of deer
Having nutritious forage and avoiding habitat degradation
Deer population trends
Hunter satisfaction
Conflict management"

I guess it all depends on what they do with the data. Seems like a very detailed survey and breakdown considering there was not a very large sample size.  :dunno:
Charlie Kirk didn't speak hate, they hated what he said. Don't get it twisted.

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1293
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: Washington Hunters’ Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Hunting Management
« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2023, 07:56:30 PM »
.6% of the 2.7% of Washingtonians that hunt. I believe the standard for surveys is to get .5% of the group being surveyed.

Better than the local news who surveys 500 people and claim to know what the people want. Or the national news surveying 1000 people and claiming to know what 300 million Americans want.

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 15998
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: Washington Hunters’ Attitudes Toward Wildlife and Hunting Management
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2023, 10:06:26 AM »
Also the media has a tendency to survey those in the urban areas. You will find a higher percentage of those that hunt and fish live in rural areas because they want to live closer to the true outdoors. That's my opinion.
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Your biggest spike elk by DeerSkin
[Today at 09:33:35 AM]


Big Changes for USFS by nwmein199
[Today at 09:07:09 AM]


Stop the Coyote "game" classification proposal by Green Tree
[Today at 08:34:42 AM]


Discretion !!! by hunter399
[Today at 06:58:22 AM]


No 4-1 fools joke. by Henrydog
[Today at 05:06:28 AM]


Stick with the 50's by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:39:34 PM]


What to do?? by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 08:16:12 PM]


Montana Big Game Combo Draw chances by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 08:10:13 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:07:39 PM]


Bills to relocate Bob Oke and continue pheasant release programs by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 04:13:03 PM]


Where to buy beef? by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 03:16:48 PM]


Back to the Pack - Hunting backpack suggestions by Dark2Dark
[Yesterday at 03:11:34 PM]


Small plastic boats? by slm9s
[Yesterday at 10:56:47 AM]


Idaho Non-Res draw results by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 10:05:04 AM]


Coyote broke my cage by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:56:36 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal