WA rifle law question?

[CP]

Hypothetically,  say someone has a side charging AR upper, and a stripped lower.  If that person removed the gas tube and plugged the gas port, then assembled the rifle, is that now a bolt action rifle or is it an evil assault rifle and subject to all the applicable evil rifle laws?

[birdshooter1189]

Disclaimer: Gun laws are not based on my opinion.

In my opinion, it is then a bolt action rifle since it requires you to manually operate the bolt between each shot. 

If adding certain parts to make it shoot full auto turns it into a machine gun, then it seems like removing certain parts to require manual bolt operation turns it into a bolt action rifle.

[buckfvr]

I believe it identifies categorically by its serial number no matter what you do to it.

Thats also why its illegal to alter weapons.  Not modify or customize but alter.

[timberghost72]

I belive the Kali Key does just that.

https://kalikey.com/

State by state info

https://kalikey.com/information/legal/

[dreadi]

It’s still an AR


BLACK HAMMER ARMS
07/02 NFA Dealer

http://www.blackhammerarms.com
http://www.facebook.com/blackhammerarms
https://www.instagram.com/blackhammerarms

[HillHound]

Yep. You can add on or chop off any parts and it’s still what it was born as. Funny how that is the case for our guns but…..
I will leave it at that, it’s  too late for me to be commenting

[jackelope]

It’s just like my TC Encores. You can have a frame with a pistol serial number and put pistol barrels on it and it’s totally legal.
Take a frame…physically the same frame… with a rifle serial number on it and put a pistol barrel on it and it’s now an SBR.

[Special T]

What if you bought it as an stripped lower? It falls in the "Other" category so what it was originally sold as is a blank receiver.

[Alchase]

I believe it identifies categorically by its serial number no matter what you do to it.

Thats also why its illegal to alter weapons.  Not modify or customize but alter.

Identified by the serial number and what the "lower or frame" was sold as.

What if you bought it as an stripped lower? It falls in the "Other" category so what it was originally sold as is a blank receiver.

It would be a "pistol" once it is built as long as you do not start it with a stock or a VFG on it. And barrel length would not matter.
Once it starts out as a "pistol" you can convert it to a rifle by putting  a stock on it, and a VFG as long as the barrel as 16" or longer. If the barrel is less then 16", you would have to register it as a SBR.
And you could switch it back to a pistol if you wish.

If you start with a lower sold as a "rifle", it will always be a rifle.
If you start with a lower sold as a "pistol", you can make it a pistol, then a rifle, and back to pistol as you wish.
If you start with a lower sold as "other", you can build anything you want.

FYI - what I posted was according to current federal law (or more correctly, AFT mandate ), not Washington state law.

[dreadi]

What if you bought it as an stripped lower? It falls in the "Other" category so what it was originally sold as is a blank receiver.

An AR stripped lower is still an AR.


BLACK HAMMER ARMS
07/02 NFA Dealer

http://www.blackhammerarms.com
http://www.facebook.com/blackhammerarms
https://www.instagram.com/blackhammerarms

[Caseyd]

Hypothetically,  say someone has a side charging AR upper, and a stripped lower.  If that person removed the gas tube and plugged the gas port, then assembled the rifle, is that now a bolt action rifle or is it an evil assault rifle and subject to all the applicable evil rifle laws?

Short and simple, it’s still an AR.

Law states all AR variants. At this time it’s believed you can’t even build a bolt action AR without violating the law.

[birdshooter1189]

I guess then we have to ask what makes something an "AR variant"? 

I'm pretty sure the intent of the law was to ban semi auto rifles that look black and scary.  In that context, semi-auto function is a core aspect of what makes it an AR.

There are bolt action rifles that accept AR handgrips, stocks, and other furniture.  I'm pretty certian these are not "AR variants" because the core mechanism operates as a bolt action.

I also wonder if you were to build your own lower, stamp it as a bolt action receiver, and then assemble it as stated in the original post, if that would be deemed acceptable according to the law.

As an engineer, I see it as "call it based on how it operates".  There are bolt guns that have furniture to look like AR's, and some AR's have furniture similar to bolt guns. But you still call them based on how they operate, and how they were designed to operate. (And maybe that last part is the key)  We could also ask the question, if you take parts that were designed to operate as a semi-auto, but you, as the builder, assemble it in a way that only functions as a bolt action, have you effectively re-designed it as a bolt action?

[Wazukie]

Isn't one of the requirenments of an "Assult Weapon" is that it has a "removable" magazine?  If an AR style rifle does not have a removable magazine, which many south of us do not, then is it still an Assualt Weapon?

[ducks4days]

Isn't one of the requirenments of an "Assult Weapon" is that it has a "removable" magazine?  If an AR style rifle does not have a removable magazine, which many south of us do not, then is it still an Assualt Weapon?

The definition will be applied as the state sees fit to achieve their goals

[Parasite]

legality aside ... when i had my gas port completely closed on my AR ... the bolt locked up something fierce when i fired it. took a lot of pounding to open the bolt.