collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Thermal vs. Night vision??  (Read 10390 times)

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 4075
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: Thermal vs. Night vision??
« Reply #30 on: February 02, 2024, 05:46:54 PM »
Tagging
Go hawks

Offline huntingfool7

  • Trade Count: (+18)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1727
  • Location: Puyallup, WA
  • Groups: huntingfool7
Re: Thermal vs. Night vision??
« Reply #31 on: February 04, 2024, 05:30:40 PM »
@jrebel   Which thermals are in the running?

I'm still not really sure.  Based on my research....mostly on youtube....I really like the pulsar scopes.  Still trying to figure out my budget as I have a lot of moving parts right now in my life and need to prioritize a few items. 

One of the scariest parts of purchasing a high dollar thermal is... I know nothing about them.  Literally never looked through one and no idea what I'm doing.  Lots of advise online and research being done to gather as much info as I can....but 5+K for a scope scares the hell out me.  Funny how I have no problem dropping 2-3K on a nightforce scope....but I know what they offer. 



Go with Pulsar.  They have a reputation for being the best at cutting through high humidity and fog.

Offline Luna butte

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 95
  • Location: East of Swale creek
Re: Thermal vs. Night vision??
« Reply #32 on: February 04, 2024, 10:13:06 PM »
So I chose digital night vision a few years ago. I just couldn’t convince myself that I’d be able to tell the difference between a coyote and a border collie with thermal. I think having a thermal monocular for scanning and a nv scope is where I’m heading though.

Offline birdshooter1189

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 615
  • Location: Port Orchard
Re: Thermal vs. Night vision??
« Reply #33 on: February 05, 2024, 06:29:50 AM »
Good friends don't let their friends buy ATN brand thermal.  Mediocre/poor image quality and a reputation for not working right.

If you want budget thermal, look at AGM.

Luna, yes you have the right idea getting a thermal monocular for scanning and then use NV for the scope. 

I'd recommend a Pulsar Axion XQ35 Pro.  They are $1500.  $2000 if you get the LRF model.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Breaking news: Lorna Smith and WWF sue WDFW Director and Deputy Director by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 11:40:47 PM]


Cancellation Alaskan Bear Hunt by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:33:49 PM]


Chasing the kids by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 07:38:39 PM]


MA10 Blackmouth anyone? by CP
[Yesterday at 07:16:06 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by Mfowl
[Yesterday at 06:31:00 PM]


Questions regarding WDFW Commissioner use of taxpayer money by Jake Dogfish
[Yesterday at 06:29:24 PM]


Big game season proposals by Ghost Hunter
[Yesterday at 04:40:21 PM]


Your biggest spike elk by carlyoungs
[Yesterday at 04:09:27 PM]


Can't miss this girl by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 02:18:40 PM]


Stop the Coyote "game" classification proposal by hunter399
[Yesterday at 05:06:55 AM]


Big Changes for USFS by Magnum_Willys
[Yesterday at 03:32:05 AM]


My pics from over the years by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 01:48:58 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal