collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Primer 157 vs 209  (Read 362 times)

Offline MeepDog

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2021
  • Posts: 713
  • Location: SE Washington
Primer 157 vs 209
« on: Today at 10:38:09 AM »
I acquired 2 boxes of shotgun primers but they’re 157 and 57 size for Remington shotgun hulls. I’m brand new to muzz and just got my first, a .50 cal Rossi single shot that the internet says uses 209 primers. Are these acceptable or should they be banished to the shadow realm?

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10660
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Primer 157 vs 209
« Reply #1 on: Today at 11:16:13 AM »
They are a smaller diameter than 209's. Toss em.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline EnglishSetter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2024
  • Posts: 275
  • Location: Winlock
  • Groups: NRA
Re: Primer 157 vs 209
« Reply #2 on: Today at 11:30:27 AM »
They are a smaller diameter than 209's. Toss em.

Yep.  Be hard pressed to find shot shells that accepted 157 size primers. 

I've read of guys using an "appropriate" straw to act as a shim/bushing, but...............

I wouldn't mess with them for shotshells or muzzle loader designed for 209 size short of an apocalypse/EOTWAWKI.

The only surefire way to make them "safe" to dispose is by expending them.  I might be tempted to throw them in the bonfire.

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal