Free: Contests & Raffles.
The club appears to be primarily driven by revenue generation. There should be a reasonable cap on how much land any one entity can control. I fully support duck clubs in principle, but KWTH feels different—it operates less like a traditional hunting club and more like a large business designed to maximize profit for the owner.Rather than locking down as much land as possible, why not focus on a limited number of properties and invest in making them exceptional places to hunt? The current approach seems to be about acquiring every available parcel and continually increasing membership to boost revenue. While that may be an effective business model, it raises the question: at what cost?This trend ultimately limits access and leaves fewer opportunities for our kids and future generations, unless they have the financial means to buy their way in.If the club and land locked up continues to grow there really will be NO WHERE TO HUNT...
I share Steins sentiment, I would rather go east and pay a guide. Not a fan of the European model.
It’s no different than the Weyerhaeuser and Rayonier access hunt clubs IMO.Not a fan
Quote from: storyteller on January 07, 2026, 06:56:16 PMI share Steins sentiment, I would rather go east and pay a guide. Not a fan of the European model.What do you think is going on over east with the guides? same/same