collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: binoclulars  (Read 5361 times)

Offline robodad

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 4437
  • Location: PA, WA.
    • frog4life !!
Re: binoclulars
« Reply #15 on: July 24, 2009, 09:04:38 AM »
When looking for binos, it is important to keep in mind that your comfort is first and formost or you won't use them as much so keep in mind that the larger the exit pupil is the better you will be able to see through them, take any set of binos and look backwards through them holding them at arms length, that small hole you see is the exit pupil and the larger that is the better you will see through them.

A 5mm exit pupil will be about the max you will need as over time our eyes (pupil) will only ever expand that far so getting the highest exit pupil will be more comfortable  then a high magnification and you will be able to see better in lower light.

Here is how you calculate it, Take the small number (8) and divide it into the larger objective number (42) and you get 5.25mm, with a 10x42 you will get a 4.2mm exit pupil so some of the light gathering capabilities is significantly reduced !!
 
The essense of freedom is the proper limitation of government !!!

Offline ZRS-8x42

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 291
  • Location: Portland
    • Zen-Ray Optics
Re: binoclulars
« Reply #16 on: July 24, 2009, 08:03:17 PM »
Bigger is not necessarily better.  Usually I find if I can't tell what I need with 8x, 10x won't work either.  I've had both out together a lot trying to figure out what I liked best.  I settled on 8x.  Why?  The fov is better, the eyestrain is less, the image is typically sharper and brighter with an 8x.  Heat mirage at distance in open country is magnified by higher magnification as well.  Whatever imperfections there exist in the binocular are also magnified more with 10x as opposed to 8x.  8x binoculars are a lot easier to hold steady too.

But the image of the 10x is 20% bigger than the 8x.  So, what you get from your question is answers from users who like 8x and users who like 10x. That comes down in almost all cases to strictly personal preference.  I can tell you what I like.  Somebody else can tell you what they like.  When it gets right down to it, you sort of have to figure that for yourself.

When you spend less money for a binocular, get the 8x.  It is easier to make better less powerful glass than more powerful glass at lower price levels. If you are looking at a roof prism binocular, it is a lot more important to be sure you are buying one with phase coating first.  Worry about magnification later.

In addition to the FOV discussed by Steve and exit pupil mentioned by robodad, higher magnification binoculars of the same model series also has a shorter eye relief. It may not be an issue for most people, even the ones with glasses. But someone may find the eye relief is too short to see the whole FOV.  The drive home message is that when designing optics, everything is about optimization and compromise of different competing factors: higher power--> narrower FOV, wider FOV--> lower power, etc, etc. When choosing binoculars, your decision is also made after evaluating the pros and cons of each model and figuring our which parameter is the most important to you for your application.  I normally recommended customers to start with 8x first if they asked my own experience, unless they knew exactly 10x was what they wanted.  As Steve said, you would not see an object with 10x either if you could not see it with 8x. Although 8x is my personal favorite (I think now I am hooked to 7x), 10x should not have any issue with image stability. Some people can push it to 12x. But again, the eye-relief with 12x can become a real issue for people wearing glasses.

Offline h2ofowlr

  • CHOKED UP TIGHT
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 9119
  • Location: In the "Blind"! Go Cougs!
Re: binoclulars
« Reply #17 on: July 27, 2009, 08:36:11 PM »
If you plan on scoping a hill side for a while.  I would look at a good pair.  Pay the money, it will help eliminate the head aches.  I picked up the Leupold 10x42 pinnacles.  They are nice.
Cut em!
It's not the shells!  It's the shooter!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

New York deer by Bearhunter308
[Yesterday at 10:14:19 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Yesterday at 10:02:50 PM]


DIY Ucluelet trip by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:40:00 PM]


Survey in ? by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:35:57 PM]


Alaska Fishing Guide and Lodge Recommendations by Tbar
[Yesterday at 09:31:49 PM]


Colorado Results by cem3434
[Yesterday at 08:35:51 PM]


NEED ADVICE: LATE after JUNE 15th IDAHO BEAR by Sliverslinger
[Yesterday at 08:31:23 PM]


Resetting dash warning lights by Sandberm
[Yesterday at 08:13:27 PM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by Mossy
[Yesterday at 06:17:02 PM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Special T
[Yesterday at 05:52:28 PM]


Oregon spring bear by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 04:58:27 PM]


Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents by idahohuntr
[Yesterday at 01:51:40 PM]


Seekins PH2 & Element sale by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 12:40:26 PM]


Kokanee Fishing Tournament!! 🎣 June 13-14, Joseph OR by WRKG4GD
[Yesterday at 11:42:02 AM]


wings wings and more wings! by birddogdad
[Yesterday at 11:00:11 AM]


Jim Horn's elk calling, instructional audio CD's. by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 09:46:03 AM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by link
[Yesterday at 07:00:33 AM]


CVA Optima V2 durasight rail mod by craigapphunt
[Yesterday at 05:56:00 AM]


Last year putting in… by wa.hunter
[May 28, 2025, 11:02:00 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by huntnnw
[May 28, 2025, 10:34:36 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal