collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80  (Read 12355 times)

Offline beardown

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 169
  • Location: Shelton
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2009, 12:55:09 PM »
The 15x56 with a tripod are unbeatable until you need more magnification at a long distance.  That's the only reason I prefer the spotting scope.   :twocents:  If I had more room I'd pack them both!


I have the 15x56's and the sts 20-60x80 HD scope I pack them both everywhere I go.  I bought my scope last year, but this years model is supposed to be lighter.  It is kinda heavy but I have looked through both side by side in low light my 80 walked all over the 65.  I guess it depends on if you are a wuss or not ;)

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8712
  • Location: NCW
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2009, 04:08:12 PM »
If you could see my pack setup I doubt you'd be calling me a wuss. ;)

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2009, 04:42:24 PM »
The 15x56 with a tripod are unbeatable until you need more magnification at a long distance.  That's the only reason I prefer the spotting scope.   :twocents:  If I had more room I'd pack them both!


I have the 15x56's and the sts 20-60x80 HD scope I pack them both everywhere I go.  I bought my scope last year, but this years model is supposed to be lighter.  It is kinda heavy but I have looked through both side by side in low light my 80 walked all over the 65.  I guess it depends on if you are a wuss or not ;)


 :chuckle:
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline elk311

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 240
  • Location: Wet-stern WA
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #18 on: October 01, 2009, 01:11:57 PM »
I have the 80 STS HD. "leave the 80 in the truck" ??? :o Are you kidding me? This scope is SO LIGHTWEIGHT it's unreal and the optical clarity is second to none!!! NEVER EVER leave these scopes in the truck! They belong in the woods. :chuckle:
US Navy Submarine Force, Retired

Offline grizzlygibbs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 339
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #19 on: October 07, 2009, 06:52:10 PM »
I am defiantly gonna do a side by side comparison before I pull the trigger on this purchase.

Offline Craig

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 2226
  • Location: Olympia
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #20 on: October 23, 2009, 09:44:47 AM »
I have the STS 80 and love it. I do need a lighter tripod. Mine is like packing around a brick.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32954
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #21 on: October 30, 2009, 01:05:55 PM »
I am defiantly gonna do a side by side comparison before I pull the trigger on this purchase.

 If possible do it in the field under extreme conditions. I have a 65 you could borrow if you can find someone with a 80.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline grizzlygibbs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 339
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #22 on: November 03, 2009, 09:13:47 PM »
I will take you up on that phool, but it will be put on the back burner for a while.  I had a small window this summer to get one, then it got shot down by the warden.  Summer of 2011 will be a definite purchase of some good glass though!

Offline muley_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 13
Re: Swarovski 65 vs swarovski 80
« Reply #23 on: December 20, 2009, 09:03:04 PM »
If you have the space in your pack go with the 80mm; I love mine and it fits perfectly in my Badlands 2200.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Cowiche Quality Buck by millerwheeler
[Yesterday at 10:46:27 PM]


Horseshoe Curve Coyote hunt?? by GeoSwan
[Yesterday at 10:35:16 PM]


Collision repair recommendations Bellingham/Sedro Wooley areas by Westside88
[Yesterday at 09:59:25 PM]


EuroOptic by Nmarth88
[Yesterday at 09:05:49 PM]


What's your favorite elk hunting cartridge? by Zardoz
[Yesterday at 09:04:33 PM]


Owl by Caseknife
[Yesterday at 08:23:40 PM]


Moose in western washington? by mountainman
[Yesterday at 07:53:45 PM]


Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics by cougkilr
[Yesterday at 07:32:10 PM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 06:57:50 PM]


From Behind by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 04:03:40 PM]


5 Points......(mule deer or blacktails) by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 03:21:45 PM]


Determining tripod value? by highside74
[Yesterday at 01:46:27 PM]


Cell Cams for Westside Elk by kball4
[Yesterday at 01:24:27 PM]


7PRC reloading by Doublelunger
[Yesterday at 12:59:56 PM]


How wide? by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 12:41:43 PM]


Tease 'l' by Ricochet
[Yesterday at 09:42:33 AM]


Look Ahead to 2026 for the CCW by Firstgenhunter
[Yesterday at 09:28:56 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal