collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock  (Read 9814 times)

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3890
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #15 on: August 28, 2009, 10:25:18 AM »
370??? People throw that # around to much. 370 is a dandy bull. Alot of people will live and die in this state with-out seeing a 370 bull, esp. a rosie.
Go hawks

Offline bucklucky

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 9541
  • Location: Skookumchuck Wa.
    • Charlie Smith
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #16 on: August 28, 2009, 02:42:34 PM »
Those bulls are not roosie, you can call them roosies like I do but they arent true roosies. Those bulls are crossed up . 370 is a great bull and something to strive for, its what Id be looking for. Problem is a 370 bull for most guys is really only a 340-450 class bull that has been mis judged  ;)

Offline Dipsnort

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 568
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #17 on: August 28, 2009, 02:43:58 PM »
Problem is a 370 bull for most guys is really only a 340-450 class bull that has been mis judged  ;)
I don't know that many of us would misjudge a 450 bull as a 370 bull. :chuckle:

Offline bucklucky

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 9541
  • Location: Skookumchuck Wa.
    • Charlie Smith
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #18 on: August 28, 2009, 02:49:23 PM »
Problem is a 370 bull for most guys is really only a 340-450 class bull that has been mis judged  ;)
I don't know that many of us would misjudge a 450 bull as a 370 bull. :chuckle:

 :chuckle:

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #19 on: August 28, 2009, 03:03:20 PM »
The elk in hancock were originally from Yellowstone way back in the day.. now there mostly rocky with some rosey mixed in.  They are very different than the elk further south and west of 5 :twocents:
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline Romulus

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 163
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #20 on: August 28, 2009, 03:55:53 PM »
I will bet none of the tagholders will kill even a 360 bull let alone a 370. There a couple pushing 370 in Hancock but they are not going to stand by road and let you shoot them. Out of all the tagholders they might get a couple over 350 if they get lucky. Most of the guys that draw the tags are not experienced elk hunters and just drive the roads until they see a decent bull and shoot it. They talk big but you put a nice 310 to 330 bull in front of them and lead will be in the air even if it is the first day. This year will be no different. To get one of the giants a guy would have to risk eating his tag and most of the tagholders never wait very long to shoot unless they don't know anything and cant find any bulls.

Offline littlebuf

  • official YAR pack mule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 2773
  • Location: orting
  • TeamYARwetspot-leavin other teams in da wetspot
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #21 on: August 28, 2009, 04:24:41 PM »
The elk in hancock were originally from Yellowstone way back in the day.. now there mostly rocky with some rosey mixed in.  They are very different than the elk further south and west of 5 :twocents:


 :o where did you dream this up? there's no boundary that would keep nor warrant transplanting elk into the tree farm. are the packwood elk transplant also? they just have to walk through the park to get to the tree farm. ive got rosie sheds up on the stairs from hancock, and ive seen bulls up there that scratch there rear end with there antlers when they put there heads back. theres toads up there and yeah you need to get off the road for um. to any of the tag holders in there  give me a price and i'll be happy to take that tag off your hands  :hello:
No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #22 on: August 28, 2009, 04:56:23 PM »
Quote
where did you dream this up?

 ;)

http://www.nps.gov/archive/mora/ncrd/elk_study_84/elkstudy-84d.htm

Quote


There are no elk on the flanks of Mt. Rainier. We were told of the presence of a few still to be found in the Tatoosh Range to the south, and on Goat Mountain, both close to the southern limits of the park. The question of winter range for these animals, in case they were established here, is one that would have to be carefully studied. No tract obviously suited to that purpose was noted by us. Should such exist, elk could be brought from the Olympic Forest Reserve to form the nucleus of a herd here. There are now in the Olympics 2,500 or 3,000 elk of the Cervus occidentalis, or Roosevelti, almost the sole survivors of the vast bands which once ranged the Pacific Coast. Were an attempt made to bring to Mt. Rainier individuals of the Olympic herd, it would probably be necessary, in order to accomplish their transfer without injury and to retain control of them afterwards, to hold them first segregated for several months under constant supervision and care, and thus partially domesticate them, before attempting to accomplish such removal to their new home. It is not, however, believed that the conditions are favorable for their presence here (Sampson 1908).

The confidence of Sampson's assertion that there were no elk on the flanks of the mountain does not seem justified considering how lightly traveled some of the park was in those days, but it does reflect the general opinion that elk were scarce at best.

In 1909 the Superintendent added to the customary expression of concern over illegal hunting the suggestion that "cougars and wild cats" might be hunted in the park to reduce their predation on deer. No mention was made of elk in a Superintendent's Report until 1911, when Edward Hall first suggested a transplant of Yellowstone elk:

It is believed that elk would thrive in the park, and I wish to recommend that some of these animals be transferred to this park from the Yellowstone National Park. Elk are protected by State laws in Washington (Hall 1911).

1912 is of course the year of the first transplant of elk to near Mount Rainier. After this date and subsequent early plantings it quickly becomes difficult to determine whether elk being seen were native or introduced animals. In 1912 Hall repeated his transplant proposal in identical words (Hall 1912). His successor, Ethan Allen, continued to suggest an expansion of park boundaries in 1913 and 1914 (Allen 1913; 1914), reporting in 1914 that "a small herd of elk have recently been observed in the central east portion of the park."

 

There were additional translates in the 1930's because all of the elk were killed during the depression for food.  That batch was dropped into the eatonville area and was also from yellowstone.
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline littlebuf

  • official YAR pack mule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 2773
  • Location: orting
  • TeamYARwetspot-leavin other teams in da wetspot
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #23 on: August 28, 2009, 06:02:31 PM »
hmmmm, i stand corrected, very interesting, where is bigfoot a transplant from tho Mr smarty pants  ;).  i still see most of them as rosie's, what are they officially classified as? they are west of the crest, are all elk on this side rosie kinda like all deer are blacktail? 
No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.

Offline STIKNSTRINGBOW

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 4366
  • Location: Chehalis
    • https://www.facebook.com/stiknstring.bow
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #24 on: August 28, 2009, 06:11:05 PM »
The division is actually I-5 for Rocky/Roosie last I knew.
The mountains are calling and I must go."
- John Muir
"I go to nature to be soothed and healed, and to have my senses put in order."
- John Burroughs
NASP Certified Basic Archery Instructor
NASP Certified Basic Archery Instructor Trainer

Offline littlebuf

  • official YAR pack mule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 2773
  • Location: orting
  • TeamYARwetspot-leavin other teams in da wetspot
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #25 on: August 28, 2009, 06:14:26 PM »
is that the official division recognized by Boone and Crocket? ive always heard that too but ive seen plenty of Roosevelt elk on this side of the highway
No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #26 on: August 28, 2009, 06:43:15 PM »
I-5 is the line for true roosevelt's.  The ones between the crest and five are cascade roosevelt's. they dont count for either rose or rock.
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline batsquatch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 197
  • Location: orting
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #27 on: August 28, 2009, 06:49:02 PM »
I think we should get Jerry Springer up in hancock to do a DNA test.

Offline Moose Jaw

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 10
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #28 on: August 29, 2009, 08:44:48 AM »
Ya elk piss i went tues. i think that tag is a flop only six bulls  :chuckle:

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Has any one seen any bulls in hancock
« Reply #29 on: August 29, 2009, 09:18:15 AM »
I-5 is the line for true roosevelt's.  The ones between the crest and five are cascade roosevelt's. they dont count for either rose or rock.

You're thinking of the state record book. It's not the same as Boone & Crocket. B&C does not have a separate category for "Cascade" elk. It's either a Roosevelt, or it's a Rocky Mountain elk. West of I-5 are classified as Roosevelts and east of I-5 are classified as Rocky Mountain.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Teanaway bull elk by chukarchaser
[Today at 05:56:53 PM]


Yakima bow shop by maxwell
[Today at 05:41:04 PM]


3 days for Kings by Stein
[Today at 05:41:04 PM]


Raffle ticket sales 2025 by 6haase6
[Today at 05:25:46 PM]


Cell cam recommendation for security? by Stein
[Today at 05:01:50 PM]


Looking for Solid 22 LR input by Zardoz
[Today at 04:57:06 PM]


If this is your trap by MADMAX
[Today at 04:40:56 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 03:55:08 PM]


The end? Bird bands. by hdshot
[Today at 03:44:43 PM]


WA Moose scouting by TriggerMike
[Today at 03:15:08 PM]


North Sea Fishing trip by BLH69
[Today at 02:05:14 PM]


2025 Crab! by BLH69
[Today at 02:02:40 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by MMCCAULEY
[Today at 09:25:10 AM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by riflehunter
[Today at 08:03:26 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Today at 07:31:32 AM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:01:45 AM]


Hunting bears in the thick stuff by J-Bone
[Yesterday at 09:23:26 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal