collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Little freak buck  (Read 10668 times)

Offline WhiskyRiver

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 53
  • Location: Spokane Valley, WA
  • I sit, hubby shoots!
Re: Little freak buck
« Reply #30 on: September 09, 2009, 11:33:36 AM »
I wonder if there is a kid around here that thinks its funny to shoot bucks in the nuts with his BB gun like I use to to to bulls on our farm.  :chuckle:

 :chuckle: :chuckle:

Offline KimberRich

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1278
Re: Little freak buck
« Reply #31 on: September 10, 2009, 09:05:15 AM »
That's known as a cactus buck.  To learn more: http://www.kingsoutdoorworld.com/feature/cactus-bucks.shtml



thats pretty interesting bow4elk, thats for the info.

I like the antlered doe at the end of the article.. Odd stuff.

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Little freak buck
« Reply #32 on: September 10, 2009, 09:39:17 AM »
I shot this guy a couple years back.  In velvet in Mid October.  All of his anatomy was accounted for.  He had a huge body with over an inch and a half of body fat on the top of his back.  Very tasty deer.

I'll second that.  I killed one very similar about 15 years ago, was absolutely fantastic eats.  Like comparing a steer to a bull.  Mine had under-developed testicles, about 3/4".

In addition to trauma, it is not uncommon to see this in mule deer (testicular atrophy) as a result of hydrocarbon environmental contamination.  In eastern Wyoming, there were a couple of old refineries and oil fields where they were fairly common.  The effect was first discovered in HUMAN oil field and refinery workers  :yike:.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal