Free: Contests & Raffles.
A few things to add. Correct me if I am wrong but 180 grain's statement is true regarding the state record book. Boone & Crockett does not have a classification for cascade blacktails. There are simply columbian blacktails and sitka blacktails. I also believe that there are no field photos REQUIRED to enter an animal in the book. If he had submitted a photo and cropped out the ass, we would not be having this conversation. As bow4elk, stated all the measurers would see the tail/rump and call this deer a muley. I think we all need to keep in mind that there are a lot of official B & C scorers that have neither seen nor scored a blacktail and would simply use B & C boundary descriptions to clarify if or not is is indeed a blacktail. I know a couple of scorers that have never hunted a day in their lives. They are antler collectors and that is why they become official scorers. My point is that just because someone is an official B & C scorer, it doesn't make him an expert in mule deer/blacktail classification. Bow4elk would definately be an exception. I would be willing to be that a lot of folks on here know as much or more than the average scorer. That being said, it is a hell of a buck. I would call it a blacktail, get is scored in 60 days and let B & C decide what they want to do. The rest is history,
Look at my buck and then look at the poached deer in oregon.They look the same. Mike
The latest rangewide genetics work pretty clearly shows that during the last glacial period, and perhaps previous ones too, that constant isolation allowed the single species to differentiate. Since the end of the last ice age, there has been some interbreeding.
Waiting the 60 day drying period to get it scored. Mike