collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Court reinstates road ban in national forests  (Read 11669 times)

Offline finnman

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+20)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1688
  • Location: Puyallup
  • I gotcha where I want ya, now I'm gonna eat ya!
Re: Court reinstates road ban in national forests
« Reply #30 on: December 23, 2009, 11:13:58 PM »
It's obvious that many on here do not have family involved in the timber industry or their jobs are not related to timber harvest :twocents:

Provide local income through timber harvest, pay construction companies to build the roads, pay them to remove the roads or gate them. Habitat inproves, if the habitat does not improve, the animal numbers keep falling, does it matter if there are no roads???? You don't have any animals to hunt!!!!! :twocents:

Offline 280ackley

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1035
  • Location: SWW
Re: Court reinstates road ban in national forests
« Reply #31 on: December 24, 2009, 12:36:03 PM »
Your right Finnman.  Some should take a drive around a few of the county's that relied on work from the our National Forests and see what happens.  Lewis county is now over 14% unemployment.  This isn't only because of the lack of work in the GP but it hasn't helped.  Also, most of the NF in the west could be self sustaining when it comes to there budgets but we all know that will never happen.
Life member: Washington Wild Sheep Foundation & NRA

Offline Jamieb

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 1862
  • Location: Lacey,WA
Re: Court reinstates road ban in national forests
« Reply #32 on: December 26, 2009, 10:23:46 PM »
If I'm remembering this right, from back when Clinton was in office. This only affects "wilderness areas"

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6080
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Re: Court reinstates road ban in national forests
« Reply #33 on: December 28, 2009, 08:45:56 AM »
If I'm remembering this right, from back when Clinton was in office. This only affects "wilderness areas"



 WRONG!   By law wilderness must be "untrammeled by man"  meaning no roads allowed. When land is designated Wilderness roads are removed in most (or all) cases.
 This was (and IS) an attempt by the green liberal left to impose de facto wilderness in other ares of the National Forests on the rest of us........
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline 280ackley

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1035
  • Location: SWW
Re: Court reinstates road ban in national forests
« Reply #34 on: December 28, 2009, 06:53:00 PM »
 :yeah:
I believe Clinton's road ban was one of the last Executive Orders he signed.  That is different from his Northwest Forest Plan which was established in 1994.
Life member: Washington Wild Sheep Foundation & NRA

Offline bonkellekter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 459
  • Location: Spokane, WA
Re: Court reinstates road ban in national forests
« Reply #35 on: December 28, 2009, 07:05:36 PM »
does it matter if there are no roads???? :twocents:

I grew up logging and my dad still has a logging business - and times are really tough for them right now - that being said this ruling (and I think this thread) has to do with designated roadless wilderness land which we as sportsmen can't afford to lose any more of. So yes it does matter if there are roads. There are many other ways to imrpove wildlife habitat like controlled burns. I am not sure if you have ever hunted any of these large roadless areas but the experience is second to none and cannot be experienced anywhere that access is as easy as turning in your hubs to drive up and down old logging roads. But I am also all for selective logging in these areas for habitat improvement when the roads are going to be re-claimed.

Offline 280ackley

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1035
  • Location: SWW
Re: Court reinstates road ban in national forests
« Reply #36 on: December 28, 2009, 07:13:17 PM »
Whats its about is bypassing Congress.  If these areas should be Wilderness areas then let congress vote on them and let it be so.  This is about bypassing congress by way of Executive Order and now Court order.
Life member: Washington Wild Sheep Foundation & NRA

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by DaNewb
[Today at 08:42:03 AM]


What are you cooking? by cjjcb
[Today at 08:23:22 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 08:13:36 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Ridgerunner
[Today at 07:58:46 AM]


Pearygin Quality by Ridgerunner
[Today at 07:56:01 AM]


New scope or not? by outdooraddict
[Today at 06:31:27 AM]


More than one shotgun? by jdb
[Today at 05:08:07 AM]


Fishin' with First-Timers by Martinhunter
[Today at 02:00:43 AM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by Cylvertip
[Yesterday at 10:54:05 PM]


Making memories by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 10:29:43 PM]


My 2025 Wyoming trip by hollymaster
[Yesterday at 07:26:47 PM]


The Mysterious $200,000 by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 07:06:09 PM]


Late Muzzy WT by Jimmy33
[Yesterday at 04:35:34 PM]


East Oak smokers? by treefarmer
[Yesterday at 03:52:44 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by IdeehoT
[Yesterday at 02:20:40 PM]


211 Mile Ambler Road Through The Brooks Range Approved by Houndhunter
[Yesterday at 02:13:34 PM]


Newbie quail hunter by Bob33
[Yesterday at 10:02:21 AM]


My Wenaha bull by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 09:30:24 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal