Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: jackelope on January 15, 2010, 02:37:21 PMespecially with a friggin anti-tank rifle.maybe thats a bit of an exxageration, but what the F do you need to shoot a deer with a .50 for?Thats what I was thinking when I was watching this show. My wife even thought he was a moron. What I would like to know is how much meat is destroyed with a .50 cal. That is a big hole and probably an even bigger hole on the exit side. How much blood shot would there be.
especially with a friggin anti-tank rifle.maybe thats a bit of an exxageration, but what the F do you need to shoot a deer with a .50 for?
Quote from: Alpine Mojo on January 16, 2010, 06:53:17 PMYes, it was filmed on an Indian Reservation in N.Dakota.OOPS!!! Forgot about that. Disregard my comment about shooting off the truck. That is standard operations on the rez. Sorry, couldn't resist.
Yes, it was filmed on an Indian Reservation in N.Dakota.
Quote from: timberghost72 on January 18, 2010, 06:07:58 PMQuote from: jackelope on January 15, 2010, 02:37:21 PMespecially with a friggin anti-tank rifle.maybe thats a bit of an exxageration, but what the F do you need to shoot a deer with a .50 for?Thats what I was thinking when I was watching this show. My wife even thought he was a moron. What I would like to know is how much meat is destroyed with a .50 cal. That is a big hole and probably an even bigger hole on the exit side. How much blood shot would there be.lol you think they actually took any meat? i would bet my house that carcass didn't move 2 feet from where it dropped, untill the coyotes started gettin to it anyhow... Don't know if he took any meat. Just wondering what a .50 cal. would do to a deer sized animal
I think he shot that show on an indian rez in the Dakotas.
Quote from: Dansk on January 16, 2010, 05:44:26 PMI think he shot that show on an indian rez in the Dakotas. I was going to say, Burnworth may be human like a lot of folks, but there's a lot worse out there, I wouldn't think he'd blatantly break the law from watching his show's, he seems to have integrity to me, though the shot does sound ill-advised.
Ive seen the show and it makes me sick. Just goes to show that even with high dollar equipment they can still miss, but of course its never the shooters fault, it must have been the $1600 swarovski scope that caused him to miss. What the show doesn't show is how many animals he wounds doing this.There is only one reason why a guy needs to shoot these ranges and our boys in the middle east are doing a good job of it.
Quote from: Dmanmastertracker on January 18, 2010, 08:22:50 PMQuote from: Dansk on January 16, 2010, 05:44:26 PMI think he shot that show on an indian rez in the Dakotas. I was going to say, Burnworth may be human like a lot of folks, but there's a lot worse out there, I wouldn't think he'd blatantly break the law from watching his show's, he seems to have integrity to me, though the shot does sound ill-advised.Integrity and Burnsworth don't belong in the same zip code. I can't prove he shot a tranquelized elk but it might as well been a barnyard pet the way it let him "sneak" up on it. The animal took two arrows in the vitals without moving a muscle. Just sat there and looked at him wondering when the feed bucket was going to show itself. I saw him get more excited for the rag horn he shot the other day b/c it appeared to be fair chase. Kudos to him for actually working for the animal. The other 50 some elk he shot that he mentioned on the show were probably like shooting fish in a barrel.
now i understand he was hunting in the traditional style of the native American just like they do here. budwiser,pick up beds and 50 cals. what a beautiful culture.