collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Oh No!  (Read 19342 times)

Offline SkookumHntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2895
  • Location: Tono, WA
Oh No!
« on: January 08, 2010, 02:24:02 PM »
Reading a article in Northwest Sportsman about the change in are special permits application process sounds real bad! I was hoping that WDFW would be limiting hunt choices, from 4 to 2 or even better 1. The Article says they may try to up it to 8. Maybe I read this wrong but I see no help in draw odds coming and it looks worse to me :bash:
IBEW89 RMEF MDF CCA

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2010, 02:25:54 PM »
come on your kidding right? :chuckle:
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline SkookumHntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2895
  • Location: Tono, WA
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2010, 02:33:10 PM »
It says something like you will be able to draw both Bull and cow and Buck and doe hunts instead of making you pick and just talks about wdfw creating more money for themselves, not helping draw odds one bit! I hope I'm missunderstanding this, but it sounds real Bad! :yike:
IBEW89 RMEF MDF CCA

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2010, 02:34:39 PM »
Thats awful "if" its true...we had a simmular rumor a few days back.  Now im starting to worry...S**T.

I can totally see them separating out the antlered draw from the antlerless draw....the odds on the antlered stuff will skyrocket....ugh

All for the almighty dollar..someone needs to pimp slap them for stealing our money. >:(
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50462
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2010, 02:42:28 PM »
WTF!     Would be good to substantiate this or disprove it so we had time to SCREAM bloody murder.

Offline SkookumHntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2895
  • Location: Tono, WA
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2010, 02:47:14 PM »
I just left a message with Dave Ware to see if he can give me the skinny on what there proposing. I doubt he calls me back but I hope he does.
IBEW89 RMEF MDF CCA

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50462
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2010, 02:49:26 PM »
Better be changes to 1 or 2 choices. NOT 8

Offline grousetracker

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 533
  • Location: centralia
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2010, 02:57:05 PM »
i remember in the 80's the wdfw would allow you to buy an early archery tag,hunt the season, pay $15.50 for a modern tag, if unsuccessfull you could buy a late archery tag for $15.50 more. thats 46.50 for just your deer or elk tags. now include $6.00-$10.00 for special permits. i see this going the same way. just spoke to my brother and he told me a non-res deer tag in georgia was 26.95 for 12 deer. 4 bucks 8 does.

Offline Viszla

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 180
  • Location: Blue Mountains
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2010, 03:04:18 PM »
This surprises you?  WDFW manages MONEY, not game anymore.  I hope this doesn't happen but I'm sure it will.  Just think of the revenue this would create.

Offline Ridgerunner

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5042
  • Location: Enumclaw
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #9 on: January 08, 2010, 03:15:39 PM »
I'd like to see the article.  When I talked to DAve last month it sounded like buck and bull quality hunts would be limited to 2 choices, antlerless would remain at 4 as well as OIL.  He did say the anterless drawing would be seperated from the quality buck/bull drawings so a guy could put in for both, but it would cost him twice, $5 per application. 

Bag limit would remain one but if a person drew an antlerless as well as a buck/bull tag they could decide what one to use to fill their limit of 1. 

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50462
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #10 on: January 08, 2010, 03:20:10 PM »
Don't mind the first part of what you said, though I'd love to see OIL go that route or more.  BUT.....not seperate for doe or buck.  That would again make draw odds worse because folks would be able to try for it what the heck.  If you choose between the two then if you go antlerless becasue you want the meat, then you are out of the big game pools (better draw odds).  Essentially what you are describing could be interpreted as 8 choices IF they kept it 4 each.

Offline SkookumHntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2895
  • Location: Tono, WA
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #11 on: January 08, 2010, 03:20:31 PM »
I'd like to see the article.  When I talked to DAve last month it sounded like buck and bull quality hunts would be limited to 2 choices, antlerless would remain at 4 as well as OIL.  He did say the anterless drawing would be seperated from the quality buck/bull drawings so a guy could put in for both, but it would cost him twice, $5 per application. 

Bag limit would remain one but if a person drew an antlerless as well as a buck/bull tag they could decide what one to use to fill their limit of 1. 
Its in that sportsmans magazine that is by the cycle traders and stuff. Page 58
IBEW89 RMEF MDF CCA

Offline villageidiot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 430
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #12 on: January 08, 2010, 07:15:41 PM »
In 10 yrs. the wolf population will have exploded and part of the plans to manage them to prevent livestock loss is remove hunting that kills the wolves food source.  With that in mind all those points we have built up will go down the sewer.  The one pack in the Methow Valley has exploded into multiple singles, doubles and one good sized pack.  At this rate all those doubles will have a litter of pups next year and the Methow should have at least 4 packs in one year.   They don't recognize it as being a pack until they have pups.  So the singles, doubles and triples aren't counted.  It appears that it's time to start looking to other states to go hunting.  With the money spent on gambling on getting drawed over the years we could of saved enough money to go on a guided big bull elk guaranteed kill.  I saw on the hunting channel you can go to Africa and kill a whole pile of animals for 6,000 and thats a guided hunt with lodging and food.  A lot of us spend a thousand dollars on chaseing a cow elk around and usually don't get one, and too you gotta get drawn to get one.   I've convinced myself and I'm going to another state.  I've had it here.

Offline winshooter88

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 713
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #13 on: January 09, 2010, 01:21:46 AM »
Tag pools

Buck and doe tags will be split up into different pools and so will bulls and cows. Possibly trophy bucks and bulls, but i don't remember for sure. No one will lose any of their existing deer or elk points as you get credit for all your points for deer on all the permit applications that you purchase. And for all your elk points on all elk permit applications that you purchase. This was discussed at the last Game Management Advisory Council meeting and will have to be approved by the game commission before going into effect.

Yes it is mostly a money move in my opinion.

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6056
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Re: Oh No!
« Reply #14 on: January 09, 2010, 09:10:08 AM »
 I wont be wasting 14 Pts. on a cow tag.
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Bear hunting conditions - Chewelah by huntnnw
[Today at 11:01:22 PM]


New fisher looking to catch some pinks this year by RB
[Today at 09:52:28 PM]


Alaska Fishing Guide and Lodge Recommendations by shootem
[Today at 09:16:23 PM]


Blackstone cooking by jackelope
[Today at 08:58:55 PM]


No More Federal Land? by jackelope
[Today at 08:53:20 PM]


Oregon spring bear by Timberstalker
[Today at 08:15:40 PM]


Montana 2025 by JakeLand
[Today at 06:45:27 PM]


State FFA award by Loup Loup
[Today at 05:34:06 PM]


Halo by Stein
[Today at 03:31:58 PM]


Refuge Forums by BD1
[Today at 11:49:40 AM]


What would you hunt with this ammo? by The Big Game Hunter
[Today at 11:47:02 AM]


Tract D and the Yakama Nation by Rugergunsite308
[Today at 09:36:49 AM]


Big J's Powder list by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 08:09:39 AM]


New Zealand Hunt by Rainier10
[Today at 07:56:04 AM]


I’m on a blacktail mission by pd
[Today at 07:37:28 AM]


Back up camera by Alchase
[Today at 06:35:46 AM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by bornhunter
[Yesterday at 09:45:46 PM]


Garmin speed-over-water sensor by Stein
[Yesterday at 08:37:25 PM]


New property cams checked by Skyvalhunter
[Yesterday at 08:35:34 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal