Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Big Game Hunting
»
Muzzleloader Hunting
»
Why no 150gr loads?
Advertisement
Advertise Here
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
All
Go Down
Author
Topic: Why no 150gr loads? (Read 9531 times)
dbllunger
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1072
Those who can do. Those who can't complain.
Why no 150gr loads?
«
on:
February 08, 2008, 10:17:54 PM »
I don't own and have never shot a muzzle loader, but I don't see a lot of 150 or heavier powder loads shown. Why is that? I thought most guns were rated to at least 150 grains of powder.
Logged
Advertise Here
SHANE(WA)
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1297
Location: MEAD, WA
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #1 on:
February 09, 2008, 01:12:04 AM »
there is a fine line of pushing a lead bullet too fast and having it smash on impact and fragmenting, and u lose accuracy alot of the times with more speed. Look at some competion muzzleloading sites and look at there loads, u will rarely find a guy shooting over 90gr. Also powder selection is a difference too triple 7 gets way more velocity out of it than Goex and pyrodex, so u could shoot more powder in the those to acheive the same velocity. Lots of practicing and testing to see what works best out of your gun, it took me awhile to find what my gun shoots best.Big lead means dead.
Logged
Sagedawg
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 657
Location: Spokane
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #2 on:
February 09, 2008, 03:40:15 PM »
well said and explained Shane, dblunger, when I bought my 1st muzzy I was bound and determined to use all 150 grains that that gun was rated for........long story short more recoil than needed, piss poor accuracy and a bear to clean. A buddy of mines dad showed me what 85 grains and a round ball would do so I wised up and lowered my powder charge and saw greatly improved accuracy. just like Shane says look around and you wont see alot of people stating that there favorite load is 150 grains under such an such bullet.BTW Shane that is an awesome bull you got there, I hope to get one like that someday.
Sage
Logged
wastickslinger
Trade Count:
(
+1
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2863
Location: pluto
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #3 on:
February 09, 2008, 03:56:01 PM »
Agree 100% that 150 grains is too much. I too was determined to use 150 grains but could not get a good group. I backed down to 120 grains 2 years ago and I might even take er down to 100 this year if i decide to go the smoke pole route.
Logged
bobcat
Global Moderator
Trade Count:
(
+14
)
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 39203
Location: Rochester
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #4 on:
February 09, 2008, 04:13:50 PM »
I've been using 90 grains of Triple 7, and that's a pretty stout load. It sure didn't have any problems going all the way through an elk this last year. There's absolutely no reason to go much over 100 grains, especially in this state where jacketed bullets are not legal.
Logged
tmike
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1390
Location: Black Diamond
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #5 on:
February 09, 2008, 05:11:55 PM »
I don't think a #11 or musket cap can burn 150 grains. A friend of mine laid out 6 feet of butcher paper in front of his rest and tested a lot of charges. Even the lower charges pushed out unburned powder. He shoots 85 grains with a 410 great plains and took his elk at 130 yds this year. I want to duplicate his experiment and see for myself. I couldn't get 130 grains of 777 to group very well.
Logged
actionshooter
Past Sponsor
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6031
Location: Olympia/Okanogan
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #6 on:
February 09, 2008, 06:31:41 PM »
It varies from gun to gun a bit, but as a general rule any charge over 120gr. (FF, black powder) and you are just blowing unburned powder out the barrel.
Logged
boneaddict
Site Sponsor
Administrator
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 50475
Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #7 on:
February 09, 2008, 06:33:46 PM »
I use 100.
Logged
My BOOK Volume ONE
https://www.blurb.com/b/11881998-muley-madness-the-collection-volume-i
Volume TWO
https://www.blurb.com/b/11882571-muley-madness-the-collection
Slenk
Guest
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #8 on:
February 09, 2008, 07:21:56 PM »
I generally shoot 85-95gr. behind patched round ball . That load has killed several Deer and 3 Elk for me. And the same load for home cast mini-balls. Depending on the gun that I am shooting.
A larger charge is not always more accurate or as accurate, as say a 100gr. load . With no more killing power . If your barrel is not long enough to burn all the powder you are just adding weight to the projectile (bullet or round ball) and reducing your velocity . (if you only burn 100grains of your150 grain loadyou are pushing 50grains added to bullet weight) .So big stout loads can work in reverse of what you are trying to do. Shoot what is the most accurate in you gun. Just like smokeless powder you can over load . Just try shooting over a Chronograph sometime.
Slenk
«
Last Edit: February 10, 2008, 06:44:08 AM by Slenk
»
Logged
Webfoot
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
+1
)
Scout
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 314
Location: Forks Wa.
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #9 on:
February 10, 2008, 08:18:36 PM »
I use 120 gr. of pyrodex in the .54 cal.
Does 50gr. of measured powder actually weigh 50 gr ?
John
Logged
Slenk
Guest
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #10 on:
February 11, 2008, 06:43:55 AM »
NO . In fact if you buy 10 different measures and do a check there will be some differences between them. Maybe not much but some.
Slenk
«
Last Edit: February 11, 2008, 06:56:18 AM by Slenk
»
Logged
actionshooter
Past Sponsor
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6031
Location: Olympia/Okanogan
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #11 on:
February 11, 2008, 07:29:02 PM »
Black powder is measured by volume.
Logged
M_ray
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+7
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4598
Location: I'm takin the 5th on this one
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #12 on:
February 11, 2008, 07:54:55 PM »
Also another thought here is that most of the people you hear about shooting 150 grains of powder are in the midwest and east where jacketed bullets and ballistic tips are leagal. I'm not sure a full lead conical bullet will hold up out of the barrel and accuracy would suffer as others have stated. For me I shoot 100 grains of 777 mostly because I started with two 50 grain pyrodex pellets and just never changed when I went strictly to powder. I am interested in tmike's test though cause if I can get the same accuracy with less powder I figure I will be saving money and have a better time with clean up!
Logged
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here are not those of HW Management, Admins, Mods or Myself... But they are the opinions of Elvis who has revealed them to me through the medium of my pet hamster, Lee Harvey Oswald...
MB
Growing old is mandatory ... Growing up is optional!
HawkenBob
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 675
Location: Port Orchard
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #13 on:
February 13, 2008, 08:45:28 AM »
I shoot a TC 50 with 100 grs of American Pioneer and a 260 grn projectile. Very accurate and consistant out to 100 yrds. (The max i've shot it)
«
Last Edit: February 13, 2008, 08:59:03 AM by HawkenBob
»
Logged
I do what the voices in my tackle box tell me to.
M_ray
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+7
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4598
Location: I'm takin the 5th on this one
Re: Why no 150gr loads?
«
Reply #14 on:
February 14, 2008, 09:50:35 PM »
Hawkenbob,
Is that American Pioneer as clean as Shockey claims? I heard it's good and I have allways wanted to give er a try ...and I may when I run through the last 2 containers of triple 7 I have.
Logged
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here are not those of HW Management, Admins, Mods or Myself... But they are the opinions of Elvis who has revealed them to me through the medium of my pet hamster, Lee Harvey Oswald...
MB
Growing old is mandatory ... Growing up is optional!
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
All
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Big Game Hunting
»
Muzzleloader Hunting
»
Why no 150gr loads?
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread
by
kodiak06
[
Today
at 06:03:49 AM]
Yard bucks
by
Boss .300 winmag
[
Yesterday
at 11:20:39 PM]
Yard babies
by
Feathernfurr
[
Yesterday
at 10:04:54 PM]
Pocket Carry
by
bb76
[
Yesterday
at 08:44:00 PM]
Seeking recommendations on a new scope
by
coachg
[
Yesterday
at 08:10:21 PM]
Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips
by
high_hunter
[
Yesterday
at 08:06:05 PM]
Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag
by
HntnFsh
[
Yesterday
at 07:58:22 PM]
MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale
by
Bob33
[
Yesterday
at 06:57:10 PM]
3 pintails
by
metlhead
[
Yesterday
at 04:44:03 PM]
1993 Merc issues getting up on plane
by
Happy Gilmore
[
Yesterday
at 04:37:55 PM]
A lonely Job...
by
AL WORRELLS KID
[
Yesterday
at 03:21:14 PM]
Unit 364 Archery Tag
by
buglebuster
[
Yesterday
at 12:16:59 PM]
In the background
by
zwickeyman
[
Yesterday
at 12:10:13 PM]
A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta
by
A. Cole
[
Yesterday
at 09:15:34 AM]
Willapa Hills 1 Bear
by
hunter399
[
Yesterday
at 08:24:48 AM]
Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale
by
Threewolves
[
Yesterday
at 06:35:57 AM]
Sockeye Numbers
by
Southpole
[July 03, 2025, 09:02:04 PM]
Selkirk bull moose.
by
moose40
[July 03, 2025, 05:42:19 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal