Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: bobcat on February 22, 2008, 06:41:46 PMQuote from: robodad on February 22, 2008, 05:25:33 PMOK what the @#$% is a fork-n-horn ?? It's a strange way of referring to a 2 point. I've heard of guys in Oregon who use that term, but nowhere else. It sounds retarded to me. Did somebody here use that term? If so, I missed it.i always thought it was a typo for what is really supposed to read as a forked-horn.
Quote from: robodad on February 22, 2008, 05:25:33 PMOK what the @#$% is a fork-n-horn ?? It's a strange way of referring to a 2 point. I've heard of guys in Oregon who use that term, but nowhere else. It sounds retarded to me. Did somebody here use that term? If so, I missed it.
OK what the @#$% is a fork-n-horn ??
Curly has it, Hunting Cowboy and Bobcat gets it......D-man, as always I'm worried about you. I missed the whole fork-n-horn thing. I've heard of a spoon buck.
I've lost five pounds to the flu this week,
I must have missed something since hunting first began in Wa.. The State's definition has always been the same and has never changed. The Wyoming definition is not actually the same, here's Washington's: "All antler points must be at least one inch long measured on the longest side. Eye guards areantler points when they are at least one inch long."Does not read the same at all, it bears no mention of specifically an eyeguard as a point. One could also assume, an eyeguard grows from the base of the antler, not the main beam itself and might not be counted. Wyoming states "any portrusion from the antler" -not the same as base of the antler. Actually when I was speaking of hunter's in those other two States I was referring to guys like Eastman, who I do no believe counts eyeguards as points. I do like Eastman's as a whole.