collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ringold gmu379 and Wahluke Gmu 278  (Read 4395 times)

Offline ttowne

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 2
Ringold gmu379 and Wahluke Gmu 278
« on: September 12, 2010, 10:21:10 AM »
Does anybody know anything about these GMUS? 379 and 278. I took my dog over there last week for a walk and thought it might have something? any thoughts or wisdom. I was thinking muzzleloading.

Offline couesbitten

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 1393
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Ringold gmu379 and Wahluke Gmu 278
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2010, 05:35:49 PM »
Tons of deer in 278, buck/doe ratio seemed poor. Only saw one buck in 8 days that I considered pulling the trigger on. Not a lot of deer in 379, gets a fair amount of pressure. Don't think it is as good today as it was a few years back before it all burned up.
With the catching ends the pleasure of the chase. - Abraham Lincoln

Offline Forrestrover

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 432
  • Location: seattle
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=560513732
Re: Ringold gmu379 and Wahluke Gmu 278
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2010, 06:54:13 PM »
I would agree with Couesbitten, when I've hunted for deer in 278, I saw a lot of does and only one spike. In 379, I've seen a few bucks, (jumped one big one that swam across the Columbia River), lots of does. My buddy took a big doe during the muzz. season a few years back. Seems like there are more deer in the early seasons as opposed to the late seasons. I also agree that the fires have had negative effect on the deer numbers in that unit.

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal