.

[wastickslinger]

.

[BIGINNER]

i choose buck 1 becaus ethere's a horse      

[UBA]

buck 1......MASS

[chester]

I'd have to say buck 3, because buck 1 and 2 are already dead 

[norsepeak]

buck #2, love the symmetry!

[wsucowboy]

man that would be a tough choice. I'd have to go with buck # 2. I love the symmetry he has. Can't go wrong with either one.

[agchawk]

Symmetry Vs Mass. I'll take buck #1 and the mass that he carries.

[Lowedog]

Buck #1 if I have to choose.    Was that second buck one that Rafflemule passed on?

[Lowedog]

Buck #1 if I have to choose.    Was that second buck one that Rafflemule passed on?

Kinda. We got a picture of it on our cell phones. Very nice buck for sure. It was a long drive to get a better look. I think it was a god call. Buck #2 was said to be 185" solid. It made it tough not to go look at him. He looks younger, has nice tine lenght. He will be a stud in a year or two.

Yeah, #2 is a sweet buck but comparing him to Rafflemule's buck I would guess him to be around 10" less.  Doesn't have the mass and mains look to be a little shorter and a little weaker on G2s.

I'd have to say buck 3, because buck 1 and 2 are already dead 

Did someone else shoot #2? 

[WABONEHNTR]

Nope I found Buck #2.  He is still alive as far as I know.  Buck #1 is the better scoring buck of the 2 bucks.  Good job Wastick

[Boss .300 winmag]

Buck 1, nice choice.

[longrange7mm]

buck one both beauties thought love the mass

[maddog11]

What did buck #1 score, if it is the better scoring buck?

[longrange7mm]

buck one is really wide
Buck two is the one on the left and really nice frame
buck three is really tall

all 3 were within 5 miles of each other

[buckmaster_wa]

I would choose buck #3. What a stud.