Free: Contests & Raffles.
724wd: 1) This situation has nothing to do with private land that one guy can hunt, and others can't. 2) What the hell does being able to afford a nicer rifle than somebody else have to do with anything? What I'm referring to is: I, personally, would NOT drive behind a gate to benefit my hunting opportunities, while others had to walk in, when the land was open for both of us to hunt. That's how I roll, and I know there are many others out there that would do the same.
This thread appears to have been jacked and turned into an ongoing thread regarding the ethics of his particular hunt. I'd shut it down or simply congrulate him and move on. Start a new thread if you want to debate this.
Quote from: MtnMuley on January 26, 2011, 12:28:51 PM724wd: 1) This situation has nothing to do with private land that one guy can hunt, and others can't. 2) What the hell does being able to afford a nicer rifle than somebody else have to do with anything? What I'm referring to is: I, personally, would NOT drive behind a gate to benefit my hunting opportunities, while others had to walk in, when the land was open for both of us to hunt. That's how I roll, and I know there are many others out there that would do the same. It is private land. Owned by his company. It's a perk of the job. The people walking in are lucky the timber company allows public access. I wouldn't feel bad. He worked for the privilege.... literally.
To me it's more interesting than a thread in which every post is the same: "congrats. nice buck!" (boring!!!)
You're right yelp, I'd have to take another weeks vacation if I had to walk up to the Pasayten.