collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: puget sound lingcod  (Read 62347 times)

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15145
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #30 on: April 21, 2011, 10:05:47 PM »
Fancy!  I hope you bend the barb down before fishing.   :rolleyes:

What's the weight on that?

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31509
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #31 on: April 21, 2011, 10:34:15 PM »
Dam thats a Hoss! :drool:
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline longknife

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 642
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #32 on: April 22, 2011, 03:44:40 AM »
Fancy!  I hope you bend the barb down before fishing.   :rolleyes:

What's the weight on that?

Fishing out of LaPush, barbs are all good, as well as size.
This one is 16oz. I can make any specific weight, and colors. 
Paddle faster!!,,,,I hear banjo's!!!!

Offline hunter105

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 57
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #33 on: April 22, 2011, 05:04:18 AM »
hadn't really thought about it.  After reading the posts will probably start looking at the regs and finding time to hit the water

Offline Jerome

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 522
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #34 on: April 22, 2011, 01:02:42 PM »
I see that they didnt remove the 120 foot depth restriction for lings in the sound. 

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15145
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #35 on: April 22, 2011, 01:44:03 PM »
I see that they didnt remove the 120 foot depth restriction for lings in the sound.

Surprised?? 

Still don't know why they don't just do the depth restriction on the rockfish as well.  Hundreds of rockfish caught on my boat in the last five years in PS fishing less than 110 feet and have only landed two of the endangered ones, one was a juvenile, which the regs don't even show what they look like.

Oh yeah, better reduce the fisherman's catch of copper and quillback rockfish so the damn seals have more to eat.   :bash:

Offline Jerome

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 522
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #36 on: April 22, 2011, 02:02:33 PM »
I also see they have a 15 shiner perch limit.  I go through 15 in 10 minutes.

Offline longknife

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 642
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #37 on: April 22, 2011, 07:48:16 PM »
I see that they didnt remove the 120 foot depth restriction for lings in the sound.

Surprised?? 

Still don't know why they don't just do the depth restriction on the rockfish as well.  Hundreds of rockfish caught on my boat in the last five years in PS fishing less than 110 feet and have only landed two of the endangered ones, one was a juvenile, which the regs don't even show what they look like.

Oh yeah, better reduce the fisherman's catch of copper and quillback rockfish so the damn seals have more to eat.   :bash:

Ya, what really made me sick, was when we went 50 miles out of LaPush, they were snagging yellow eye like crazy! At 500+ feet, the stomach bursts, and they are released, floating on top of the water. Must have been 30 yelloweye floating, you think the state would put the dead to use....
Paddle faster!!,,,,I hear banjo's!!!!

Offline pjb3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1198
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #38 on: April 24, 2011, 08:56:46 AM »
When is the opener? Is it the first of May?
No regs out yet so how does one know?

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15145
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #39 on: April 24, 2011, 09:01:45 AM »
Always May 1 for the Sound.  Wouldn't surprise me though if they tripled the wardens and changed it to May 2....

http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01185/wdfw01185.pdf

You can download it.

Offline blacktailcrzy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 236
  • Location: kitsap
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #40 on: May 01, 2011, 10:04:25 PM »
well lets here it who caught the big one we we boxed out with a few 30's and six under sized fish

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15145
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #41 on: May 02, 2011, 07:37:38 AM »
One shorty for us.  Fishing was great... catching sucked.  Have heard of a lot of keepers caught though.

Offline h2ofowlr

  • CHOKED UP TIGHT
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 9114
  • Location: In the "Blind"! Go Cougs!
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #42 on: May 02, 2011, 08:12:53 AM »
Damn.  I had family in town and took them over to Deception Pass State park on Sunday and was looking at the 40 or so boats under the bridge when it dawned upon me that I missed the openner.   :bash:
Cut em!
It's not the shells!  It's the shooter!

Offline xxlx7

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 293
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #43 on: May 02, 2011, 12:12:05 PM »
104" for us in our boat. One 36", one 35.5 and one 32.5. Weight 18.8 lbs, 15.9 lbs, 12.7 lbs. Not a bad day for us three!!!!

Offline C-Money

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 11038
  • Location: Grant County
  • Self proclaimed 3pt master
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #44 on: May 02, 2011, 12:46:17 PM »
Nice looking Lings xxlx7, what is the small fish?
I felt like a one legged cat trying to bury a terd on a frozen pond!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Spring bear 2026 by TeacherMan
[Today at 01:49:43 PM]


2026 Sheds “Found one” by Wetwoodshunter
[Today at 01:37:21 PM]


Cage Trapping Bobcats by 3nails
[Today at 01:22:06 PM]


Idaho Selway A pack out camps by Kool-aid
[Today at 12:43:02 PM]


Muzzy needs by HntnFsh
[Today at 11:00:23 AM]


Smelt ? by HntnFsh
[Today at 10:18:01 AM]


CZ Bobwhite G2, anyone have one, wish to pontificate. by BD1
[Today at 10:07:07 AM]


Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by Humptulips
[Today at 09:20:14 AM]


Baiting Cougars? by Cougartail
[Today at 07:38:36 AM]


Mercedes Class C motorhome? by scotsman
[Yesterday at 05:09:59 PM]


Inability to Post Pics by Knocker of rocks
[Yesterday at 03:34:48 PM]


Archery Shops in Lacey/Oly? by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 02:57:43 PM]


Tease 'l' by Brute
[Yesterday at 02:47:32 PM]


Got a lion today by erronulvin
[Yesterday at 02:40:39 PM]


Any Marlin old lever action experts or collectors on here? by timberfaller
[Yesterday at 02:00:31 PM]


Some nice animals from last season by Brooklyn
[Yesterday at 01:49:05 PM]


Old shotgun shells by hunterruss
[Yesterday at 01:12:35 PM]


Ram front bumpers by Sandberm
[Yesterday at 11:11:12 AM]


American Legion Post #14 Winter/Spring Raffle by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 11:03:57 AM]


Wyoming 2026, who's in? by Mtnwalker
[Yesterday at 09:34:56 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal