collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW News Release: Public can comment on plans for hunter-access grant initiativ  (Read 3138 times)

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50284
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
WDFW NEWS RELEASE
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1091
http://wdfw.wa.gov/

June 21, 2011
Contact:  WDFW Wildlife Program: (360) 902-902-2515

Public can comment on plans for
hunter-access grant initiative

OLYMPIA - The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) will accept public comments through July 21 on a $1.5 million federal grant designed to encourage more private landowners in Washington to open their lands to hunting and other forms of outdoor recreation.

The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) was one of 17 agencies nationwide to qualify for a three-year grant under the new Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program administered by the USDA under the 2008 federal Farm Bill.

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act, USDA's Farm Service Agency recently determined that the department's plans for the grant money would not have a significant effect on the environment.

The federal findings are posted at http://bit.ly/mpufNQ . Public comments on those findings may also be submitted on that site.

Dave Ware, WDFW game manager, said the state agency has already raised $400,000 to expand hunter access to private lands through additional fees paid by hunters who apply for new permit-only hunts.

"Hunters consistently rank access to suitable hunting areas as one of their top concerns," Ware said. "With the additional federal funding, we'll be able to build on current state efforts to expand hunting opportunities for years to come."

In addition, WDFW plans to establish at least five new wildlife-viewing areas near urban areas of the state.

Key initiatives planned by WDFW include:

Access Near Urban Centers ($437,240): Increase acreage enrolled in the Snow Goose Hunting Program and the number of waterfowl hunting blinds available through such programs as "Feel Free to Hunt," "Register to Hunt" and "Hunt by Written Permission" from 10 blinds to 25 blinds; establish public big game hunting access on at least 5,000 acres of private forest lands; and establish at least five new watchable wildlife opportunities on private farmlands.
Snake River Conservation Reserve Program ($387,300): Establish public hunting access on at least 12,500 additional acres of private farm land and establish public access for hunting on an additional 15 farms also enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP).
Corn Stubble Retention ($63,000): Double the amount of acres enrolled in the program to attract game birds to farmlands.
Southwest Washington Private Forest Land Access ($499,680): Establish public hunting access on at least 50,000 additional acres of private forest lands.
Improved Use of Technology ($155,000): Develop a new GoHunt interactive mapping program and an automated system for reserving hunting days on private lands enrolled in WDFW's programs.
Ware said WDFW has bolstered its Private Lands Access program to reverse the steady decline of land open to hunting due to population growth, suburban sprawl and crowding on public lands. Just over one million acres of private land is currently open to hunting under agreement with WDFW, compared to three million in the late 1990s, he said.

"Our staff is out working with farmers, ranchers and owners of private timberlands on multi-year agreements right now," he said. "We want to have as many of these agreements in place as possible by the time fall hunting seasons get under way." 

:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline Bigshooter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 6367
  • Location: Lewis Co
  • High Wide And Heavy
This was my comment:

Why are you going to use money from a “hunter access-grant initiative” to “establish at least five new watchable wildlife opportunities on private farmlands”?  What does wildlife watching have to do with hunter access?  Sounds like the government is using a grant for something they should not be using it for.  Please do not waste money on opening these “watchable wildlife opportunities on private land” with money that is supposed to be used for opening up private land for hunting.
Thank you,
XXXX XXXXX
Welcome to liberal America, where the truth is condemned and facts are ignored so as not to "offend" anyone


"Borders, language, culture."

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/

Offline Sumpnneedskillin

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1614
  • Location: Pomeroy WA
This was my comment:

Why are you going to use money from a “hunter access-grant initiative” to “establish at least five new watchable wildlife opportunities on private farmlands”?  What does wildlife watching have to do with hunter access?  Sounds like the government is using a grant for something they should not be using it for.  Please do not waste money on opening these “watchable wildlife opportunities on private land” with money that is supposed to be used for opening up private land for hunting.
Thank you,
XXXX XXXXX

You're not going to like the response. 

The first sentence has this in it "open their lands to hunting and other forms of outdoor recreation."
What's the most dangerous thing said in the US Navy? -- A Chief Petty Officer saying "Watch this s$%^!!"

"I can imagine no more rewarding a career. And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'"
President John F. Kennedy

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44770
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
This was my comment:

Why are you going to use money from a “hunter access-grant initiative” to “establish at least five new watchable wildlife opportunities on private farmlands”?  What does wildlife watching have to do with hunter access?  Sounds like the government is using a grant for something they should not be using it for.  Please do not waste money on opening these “watchable wildlife opportunities on private land” with money that is supposed to be used for opening up private land for hunting.
Thank you,
XXXX XXXXX

It's probably a moot point, as it looks like we're being turned down for the grant.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline loper

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 31
  • Location: Salem
Possibly because the grant access criteria goes beyond just hunting?

"The VPA-HIP provides an opportunity for State and tribal governments to apply for
grants to encourage owners and operators of privately-held farm, ranch, and forest land to
voluntarily make that land available for access by the public for wildlife-dependent
recreation, including hunting, fishing, and other compatible recreation and to improve
fish and wildlife habitat on their land under programs administered by State or tribal
governments."

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
I've been working on the access issue for years.  It's good to have more than just hunting access in some places because it gives you more supporters and more leverage.  For example, in SW Washington private timberlands block public land near Mt. St. Helens.  This public land contains USFS trailheads, and is popular with hunting, fishing, hiking, camping, mt. bikes etc.  The private land is mostly hunting, but also steelhead and salmon fishing and berry picking.  It is much harder to justify keeping the gates closed when more public resources that just wildlife (public land, fish) are locked up.  The more people it affects, the more likely large companies will negotiate to open gates because the Weyerhaeusers-of-the-world still don't like bad press.   Farmers might work the opposite, they would open for a few hunters, but not everyone.

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
This says it all............comment from Ware

Just over one million acres of private land is currently open to hunting under agreement with WDFW, compared to three million in the late 1990s, he said.

Unbelievable to say the least.  He and his fellow morons in Wildlife Management were the cause of the decline starting in 1999.  They took over through reorganization, a program that did everything right for sportsmen.  They disassembled it by reducing staff and priorities.  Now they try to sell us on the great spend all you money on mickey mouse applications so we can add some "urban" sites...waterfowl sites , which by the way should be paid for through duck stamp funds, and whatever else stupid access they can buy, when most of the 3 million we used to have was over a cup a coffee, handshakes, doing habitat work on said ground or free signing.

Pay for access and the ones that gave it to us for little or nothing as mentioned above drop out of the program since you can't pay everyone.  It's like taking one step forward and four steps back.  Calling it stupid would be a compliment.  Freaking idiots...... :bash: 
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25038
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Big Tex might know for sure but i think the term is CONVERSION... It is Theft of our funds... They say the need it and "borrow" it, and then use it on stuff they want to... and never pay it back to the intended purpose.... If i "borrowed"  your car to go to the store and then decided i wasn't gona give it back I would get may ass in a bind... If your the STATE nothing happens.  :bash:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal