binoculars between $300-$600 ?

[twistiron]

i got some redfields and i absolutly love them, they have been bomb proof so far. i bought them for truck glasses and they ride on the dash all the time with no issues. i exspecially like them in low light super clear and crisp image. they cost much less then your range but just my  . good luck.

[rotty33]

If you ever make it to a cabelas store, the bargain cave always has some binos. I bought a returned pair of cabelas alaskan guide 10X42's that were origionally 600 for 225. Got lucky I guess and they look brand new!

[Bean Counter]

I have the Nikon Monarch in 8x42. I hunt mainly the wetside so I opted for the wider field of view when glassing in the brushy stuff. I have been very happy with Nikon. You have to look through them all really to find out what you like.

+1. I hunted with these for five years and found them to be an excellent value.

[colockumelk]

If you can afford Binoculars in the $400-$600 range, then I would definitely stay in that range.  The main thing is do not go lower.  You should go with the best binoculars you can afford because You get what you pay for.  While cheaper binos have been putting out some clear glass, you have to wonder how long they will stay that way.

I just did a full review on the Vortex Talon HD 10X42 Binoculars.  They are incredible for the price: $450.  You will not find binos with these specs and at this price.  They are incredibly clear, have a very wide field of view, and are very comfortable for long hours of glassing.  Plus a lifetime warranty.

Check out my full review with pictures here: http://www.bestforhunting.com/2011/07/vortex-talon-hd-binocular-review/

I have tested a lot of binoculars and have compiled a list of the best binoculars in different price ranges from $100 up to $3000.  Check it out to find some binoculars that fit you budget: http://www.bestforhunting.com/best-binoculars-for-hunting/

That was an excellant write up.  Thankyou for that.  I've actually been looking pretty heavily at buying those for my next pair of binos but havn't been able to find a good review of them.  Thank you.

[7ultra]

cant go wrong with the vortex  for the money and price and they are very comparable with the much more expensive swarovski for lots cheaper
i own both  wouldnt spend the extra 2000 again for the little if any difference

[TikkaT3-270Shortmag]

Vortex hands down!!

[HunterJim]

Love my Nikon Monarchs.....

[twistiron]

hahaha, this is great well i got an idea, jump in the truck head to cabelas try out all the ones in and around your price range, take some time to read the reviews on the ones you like and order them from the cheepst place on the web. good luck man there are so many great options.

[hirshey]

Love my Nikon Monarchs.....

The only thing I can say negative about the Monarchs is the eye relief cups are prone to sticking, and if you send them in for repair you will most likely be paying out of pocket. Nikon does not have the best customer service... my boyfriend and mother both have a pair, and they BOTH had the eye relief stick... sent them in to be repaired and were told that "it must have been damaged in shipment" and were charged $50 for repair. Fail.

In contrast, the Leupold Mojaves in the same 10x42 are in the high to mid $300 range and gather more light, are more clear with excellent customer service. My boyfriend and mother both have them on their wishlist for their next pair. They are also pretty light. Since I have gotten my pair (I use them for deer, bear, coyote, elk, and shed hunting) three of my friends have converted after comparing theirs to mine... including my father who had a pair of Leupold gold rings and liked the Mojaves better. (clarity is similar and the mojaves are much lighter)

[hirshey]

Love my Nikon Monarchs.....

The only thing I can say negative about the Monarchs is the eye relief cups are prone to sticking, and if you send them in for repair you will most likely be paying out of pocket. Nikon does not have the best customer service... my boyfriend and mother both have a pair, and they BOTH had the eye relief stick... sent them in to be repaired and were told that "it must have been damaged in shipment" and were charged $50 for repair. Fail.

In contrast, the Leupold Mojaves in the same 10x42 are in the high to mid $300 range and gather more light, are more clear with excellent customer service. My boyfriend and mother both have them on their wishlist for their next pair. They are also pretty light. Since I have gotten my pair (I use them for deer, bear, coyote, elk, and shed hunting) three of my friends have converted after comparing theirs to mine... including my father who had a pair of Leupold gold rings and liked the Mojaves better. (clarity is similar and the mojaves are much lighter)

Conversely, if you want a pair of 10x42 Leupold HD Gold Rings that have been out of their case roughly 10 times let me know. 

[superdown]

this is what i use i really like them because they are light enough so i carry them alot more often then i would carry my  larger set. they are  Zeiss conquest 10x25 i paid $450.00 about about six years ago 

[ZRS-8x42]

we are ready to ship the ZEN ED3 next week. The current 20% promotion is still valid until August 1st.  Please feel free to contact me if there is anything I can help with.  Remember, we have 30-day satisfaction guarrantee and lifetime warranty on the products.

Thanks

[columbiaman]

another vote for Zen-Ray.  My buddy and I each got a pair of their ZEN ED2. When comparing to more expensive european binoculars, we couldn't tell much difference to jusitfy the extra $$$.

http://www.zen-ray.com/

[wehunt]

I have a pair of Mojaves for sale if you are interested. For the price they are as good as I've seen. I am getting a pair of Swarvoski's so I won't need them any more.

[Bean Counter]

Love my Nikon Monarchs.....

The only thing I can say negative about the Monarchs is the eye relief cups are prone to sticking, and if you send them in for repair you will most likely be paying out of pocket. Nikon does not have the best customer service... my boyfriend and mother both have a pair, and they BOTH had the eye relief stick... sent them in to be repaired and were told that "it must have been damaged in shipment" and were charged $50 for repair. Fail.

In contrast, the Leupold Mojaves in the same 10x42 are in the high to mid $300 range and gather more light, are more clear with excellent customer service. My boyfriend and mother both have them on their wishlist for their next pair. They are also pretty light. Since I have gotten my pair (I use them for deer, bear, coyote, elk, and shed hunting) three of my friends have converted after comparing theirs to mine... including my father who had a pair of Leupold gold rings and liked the Mojaves better. (clarity is similar and the mojaves are much lighter)

Ms. Hirshey, not to discount your experience, but I must state that mine was the opposite. I had a pair of Monarch's for five years that saw a heavy amount of use and even some abuse. An eyecup became loose, eventually cracked, then fell off.

I mailed the set to Nikon, without any paperwork, and received a new pair of the updated model in the mail.

No argument though that Leupold has a better customer service reputation than Nikon. My next glass purchase will probably be a Leupold rifle scope.  I've liked the looks of those Mojave's for a long time--glad they're working out for you