wolves will remain delisted...

[WAcoyotehunter]

Not sure if this is already posted, but malloy ruled that the congressional delisting was constitutional.


FYI  - Judge Molloy ruled and the reissuance of our 2009 delisting rule for gray wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains (as directed by Congress) will remain in effect (i.e., he did not find it to be unconstitutional).  We will continue our work on the status review for gray wolves in the Pacific Northwest as planned.

-Jesse

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse D'Elia
Endangered Species Recovery Coordinator
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Regional Office
911 NE 11th Avenue, 4th Floor
Portland, OR 97232

[jackelope]

 

[Wenatcheejay]

 

 

[denali]

Wow,  good deal 

[mulehunter]

    can't wait to go out

Wolves.               


Mulehunter.   

[CedarPants]

 

[BOWHUNTER45]

Holy sheet batman ... that really  me ....

[Kain]

Good news!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/environment/judge-reluctantly-upholds-law-stripping-northern-rockies-wolves-of-endangered-species-status/2011/08/03/gIQAPlnssI_story.html

[flinger]

So what exactly does this mean

[high country]

So what exactly does this mean

That the Eco nazis will sue again.

[Machias]

Wow, I'm actually suprised!  Yehaw!

[bearpaw]

Judge upholds wolf law passed by Congress
Associated Press | Posted: Wednesday, August 3, 2011 6:14 pm

HELENA - A federal judge has reluctantly ruled to uphold a congressional budget provision that removed federal protections for the Northern Rockies gray wolf outside of Wyoming.
 
U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy says that binding precedent by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals requires him to rule against a constitutional challenge of the rider passed by Congress earlier this year.
 
Molloy wrote in his order Wednesday that without that precedent, he would have ruled unconstitutional the provision that strips wolves of their endangered status in Montana, Idaho and parts of Washington, Oregon and Utah.
 
Molloy says he believes the way Congress passed the provision undermines and disrespects the fundamental idea of the rule of law.
 
Before Congress' action in April, Molloy had twice blocked attempts to lift protections for the predators.


Read more: http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_f1ea1d00-be2e-11e0-98b2-001cc4c03286.html#ixzz1U1P580ww

[bearpaw]

So what exactly does this mean

 

[Wea300mag]

Wow, I'm actually suprised!  Yehaw!

 

[sebek556]

setp in the right direction woohoo!