collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?  (Read 6838 times)

Offline Evoac05

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 327
  • Location: Marysville, WA
Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« on: September 18, 2011, 10:39:31 PM »
So I'm getting into archery and figured I would get a range finder, but I'm not quite sure which one to get. What are key features you look for in a range finder? What ranger finder do you suggest to get or to stay away from? Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks

Offline buck man

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1269
  • Location: Spokane area
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2011, 11:47:32 PM »
Nikon "archers choice" best one I have used. Had three and it is the best for the money. :twocents:
If we were supposed to be vegetarian God would have made broccoli more fun to shoot!
"HOYT" why would you even consider shooting something else?

Offline archerE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 27
  • Location: Kitsap
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2011, 09:42:31 PM »
I have the Bushnell ARC 1000. The display in sometimes hard to read in low light. Black numbers and crosshairs in dark timber in hard to makeout. :twocents:

Offline RS

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 11
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2011, 08:33:45 AM »
Look at the Nikon Rifle 550, with angle compensation. Its the same as the Nikon Archers Choice, but goes out past 100 yards. (not so you can shoot a 500 yard arrow, but you can range a bedded animal and judge your stalk and landmarks) and you could use it for rifle hunting if the need arises (but once you go archery you probably wont go back :chuckle:)

The angle compensation yardage has worked great on my Nikon when target shooting up or downhill out past 100 yards.

IMHO its the best.
RS


Offline rebal69972

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 840
  • Location: lakewood WA
  • wfw
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2011, 08:59:31 AM »
I have the Bushnell ARC 1000. The display in sometimes hard to read in low light. Black numbers and crosshairs in dark timber in hard to makeout. :twocents:

 i have a leupold RX-600. i have the same problem in low light or in dark timber its hard to see
I'm your huckleberry

Offline hoytem

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 839
  • Location: 253
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2011, 09:22:44 AM »
Look at the Nikon Rifle 550, with angle compensation. Its the same as the Nikon Archers Choice, but goes out past 100 yards. (not so you can shoot a 500 yard arrow, but you can range a bedded animal and judge your stalk and landmarks) and you could use it for rifle hunting if the need arises (but once you go archery you probably wont go back :chuckle:)

The angle compensation yardage has worked great on my Nikon when target shooting up or downhill out past 100 yards.

IMHO its the best.
RS

 :yeah:

Offline JBR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 228
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2011, 02:16:16 PM »
Look at the Nikon Rifle 550, with angle compensation. Its the same as the Nikon Archers Choice, but goes out past 100 yards. (not so you can shoot a 500 yard arrow, but you can range a bedded animal and judge your stalk and landmarks) and you could use it for rifle hunting if the need arises (but once you go archery you probably wont go back :chuckle:)

The angle compensation yardage has worked great on my Nikon when target shooting up or downhill out past 100 yards.

IMHO its the best.
RS

 :yeah:

Offline bwhntr2819

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 66
  • Location: A day late
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #7 on: September 20, 2011, 03:42:55 PM »
The two most important features IMO are angle compensation and reticle color for bowhunting. Get one that has TBR (true ballistic ranging) or ARC (angle range compensation). Each manufacturer has there own name for it. My older Leupold Rx-II has black letters that are difficult to see against a dark backdrop. A buddy got the new Leupold RX 1000 this season and it has red led display. Huge difference.
IAFF Local 2819

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #8 on: September 20, 2011, 03:53:57 PM »
I archery hunt and rifle hunt.  So I go with one that has the distance for the rifle.  I also like the luminated range numbers that show up when just before hunting light.  Leica does that for our type of hunting. 
275 down 2

Offline jager

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1238
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #9 on: September 20, 2011, 04:22:01 PM »
I lost my older Bushnell rangefinder that I've had for maybe 7 or 8 years while coyote hunting this past winter...
I purchased a Leupold RX 1000? I sent it back, It didn't seem to range fast enough for my liking.
So... last week I bought a Leica crf 1600. A little on the spendy side but I'm always looking for good equipment so I don't have to replace it in a year or two.
I've got it to range out to about 1100 in the neighborhood. Thats the farthest I can see!
I can only get it to range down to about 12 yards.. not sure what the specs are.
Its lightning fast, small, got a bright red led readout and lots of cool features I haven't played with yet.
I bow and rifle hunt so I'm sure this little gem is going to work great!

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #10 on: September 20, 2011, 04:32:29 PM »
You can't beat the Leica crf. Hands down the best range finder I've used.

Offline gaddy

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 2920
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #11 on: September 20, 2011, 04:39:06 PM »
any consideration to the reflective-vs-non reflective ranges on these units ?

Offline jager

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1238
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2011, 04:43:43 PM »
I discount the advertised reflective target ranges....I don't shoot at cars or buildings too often  :chuckle: I only range the organic stuff!

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31528
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2011, 05:18:17 PM »
I have a Leica crf it has never let me down and helped me take a lot of great animals. I would look into the leupold line up as well. With the built in angle adjustment. Its killer for bow hunting :tup:
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline gaddy

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 2920
Re: Looking to get a range finder, but which one?
« Reply #14 on: September 20, 2011, 05:31:38 PM »
only reason i brought up the reflective issue is im also considering getting a range finder. the salesman at wholesale warned me that the general range advertised was reflective & that the actual nonreflective (animal) range could be dramatically reduced.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SWAKANE EWE by vandeman17
[Today at 02:55:45 PM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by Buzzsaw461
[Today at 02:44:10 PM]


Pocket Carry by vandeman17
[Today at 02:32:45 PM]


Video highlighting and discussing WDFW corruption by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 01:42:41 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by High Climber
[Today at 01:35:58 PM]


Tease 'l' by kellama2001
[Today at 01:23:41 PM]


What barrel length 24”, 26” or 28” by Call em in
[Today at 12:47:43 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by addicted1
[Today at 12:38:05 PM]


PROOF RESEARCH CLOSEOUT by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 12:35:23 PM]


Article on the beaver trapping ban in OR by Humptulips
[Today at 12:27:08 PM]


Go kill some dogs! by fowl smacker
[Today at 11:27:32 AM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by Ajmani84
[Today at 11:22:47 AM]


Athlon Rangecraft Chrono by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 11:09:00 AM]


June 26-27th WDFW Commission Meeting. Showing of sportsmen needed for Friday. by Docspud
[Today at 09:27:00 AM]


38% increase in fishing and hunting licenses by mikey549
[Today at 06:07:39 AM]


E scouting for bears by bear
[Today at 05:55:13 AM]


Herring anyone? by CastleRocker
[Yesterday at 09:42:53 PM]


Leupold Display fade by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 08:17:29 PM]


Minimum post count needed to view classifieds by Hucci
[Yesterday at 06:43:35 PM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Yesterday at 03:12:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal