collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 7mm or .300?  (Read 10322 times)

Offline MuleySniper

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 4622
  • Location: WA
Re: 7mm or .300?
« Reply #45 on: March 10, 2012, 11:22:29 AM »
Love my .300 wby. Kicks pretty good with anything over 180. Its a ruger #1 though so its already a heavy gun. Id like to try a 7mm. Sportsmans had a pretty nice Tikka SS/comp with a fluted barrel in 7mm for like $649 I think. I was definitely tempted. Make a great all around rifle that you wouldn't worry about not trying to scratch or ding.
MS
"Gun control is for wimps and commies. Listen, let's get one thing straight. Guns don't kill people. I do. "
Earl Ramsey

Offline MDGrand

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 722
Re: 7mm or .300?
« Reply #46 on: March 10, 2012, 12:03:14 PM »
The main difference that I see is with the smaller 7mm caliber, recoil is less. With a 30 caliber, recoil is going to be more, simply because of the heavier bullet. Ballistics are virtually identical if using comparable bullets.

 7mm has a better BC. ;)

Well.. when comparing HEAVY 7mm bullets to HEAVY 30 caliber bullets the BC race is pretty close!

Especially in the case of using Berger Bullets..

If you compare a ballistics chart of a 7mm Rem Mag shooting a 168 Grain Berger shot at 3050 FPS vs a 300 RUM shooting a 210 grain Berger shot at 3050 FPS... the velocity at 1000 yards is almost identical. What is different though is the ENERGY at 1000 yards... the 30 cal from a 300 RUM has over 300 lbs more lbs of energy.

Personally, I have NEVER shot a 300 RUM or 7mm Rem Mag that were not almost identical in recoil.. so I vote for the 300 RUM.

But hell.. at the end of the day both are awesome. So.. pick a favorite I guess :)

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal