collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW Depending on Citizen Science to confirm bird counts  (Read 5604 times)

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45346
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WDFW Depending on Citizen Science to confirm bird counts
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2011, 05:03:32 PM »
Here is the response I got from the WDFW. It basically says they start paying attention to wolf reports when there are more than a couple from one area. You decide:

"Mr. W...,

The Director has asked that I respond to your recent e-mail regarding  gaining public assistance in conducting wolf counts similar to the concept applied with the Christmas Bird Counts.

 

Your idea is a good one. We are always looking to involve the public in assiting us in gathering wildlife information. This is  particularly true during these austere fiscal times where “citizen science” can help WDFW in gaining information that might other wise have been conducted by the employees we have lost during recent years. Unfortunately, the natural history of wolves does not lend itself well to the public survey concept employed in the Christmas Bird Count. Birds, for the most part, are highly visble and readily surveyed  to identify thier species and numbers. Wolves on the other hand, particuarly in the pioneering stage as they are in Washington, are highly secretive, avoid humans and are rarely seen. This changes a little bit once wolves begin pack formation and set up territories. At that time wolves are heard and more often seen. Our current protocol is record all credible wolf sighting and when we begin to get “clusters” of sighting we deploy remote cameras (trailcams). Once we begin to get visual comfirmation from trail cams we then trap the wolves in the area  and place radio telememtry caller on them. We then can determine their  territories, specific location and eventually the size of the pack. We have utilized citizen science in the deployment of trail cams and record the observation of hunters and others when they are in the bush. However, our experience. and those of other states, is that a broad survey for wolves prior to pack formation is not effective.

 

We do appreciate your interest. More information on our current packs status, wolf indentification, as well as mechanism for reporting wolf sightings can be found on our website http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/gray_wolf/.

 

Sincerely,

Rocky Beach

 

Richard J. (Rocky) Beach

Wildlife Diversity Division Manager

WDFW"
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline jager

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1238
Re: WDFW Depending on Citizen Science to confirm bird counts
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2011, 05:19:12 PM »
Don't "we" already have clusters?
Sounds like a long time from the point of credible sightings through, and until collaring.
 :mor:

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45346
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WDFW Depending on Citizen Science to confirm bird counts
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2011, 06:30:22 PM »
Don't "we" already have clusters?
Sounds like a long time from the point of credible sightings through, and until collaring.
 :mor:

It does sound like a lot of confirming before reporting.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Roosevelt Elk. Please nudge me in the right direction. I feel hopeless. by hunter399
[Today at 04:13:41 AM]


Hunting late season, where would you go? by Kc_Kracker
[Yesterday at 11:40:47 PM]


Afraid of the Wasteways by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 11:06:30 PM]


Upland bird carry options by McQuackin
[Yesterday at 09:50:25 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by redi
[Yesterday at 09:29:16 PM]


Stillaguamish 448 QD rifle tag by jason stevens
[Yesterday at 08:00:42 PM]


F150 Ecoboost Guys by elksnout
[Yesterday at 07:51:18 PM]


Drew Pogue Quality by bigmacc
[Yesterday at 07:31:36 PM]


As He Lay by str8meat
[Yesterday at 06:14:34 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 05:21:39 PM]


Any MT deer updates? by bustedoldman
[Yesterday at 05:05:58 PM]


My Wenaha bull by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 03:52:32 PM]


Manastash snow level by Angus
[Yesterday at 03:09:55 PM]


“Frosty” 3 Year Story of my 2025 General WA Mule Deer Hunt by wafisherman
[Yesterday at 03:05:56 PM]


Thermal Optics Setup for Predators by Zardoz
[Yesterday at 03:04:47 PM]


Late season east side elk by gaolista
[Yesterday at 02:25:14 PM]


Montana Bull Elk "Recovery" by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 12:31:07 PM]


"Border Lands Conservation Act" courtesy of Mike Lee (R-UT) by High Climber
[Yesterday at 12:20:31 PM]


Grouse hunting Near Yakima by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 10:17:52 AM]


Bear Paw Outfitters Idaho Elk and Deer Hunt Units 77,78,79 by Mtnwalker
[Yesterday at 10:15:36 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal