collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction  (Read 98291 times)

Offline furbearer365

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 933
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #210 on: January 02, 2012, 09:35:02 AM »
SITKA, YOU STILL WILL NOT ANSWER MY QUESTION ON WHAT SORT OF "GOOD" WILL COME FROM REINTRODUCED WOLVES.  WHY WOULD WE WANT TO HAVE THESE ANIMALS "TAKE OUT" ALL OF OUR OTHER PREDATORS.  WE DONT NEED THEM AROUND TO SCAVANGE.  WE HAVE COYOTES, BOBCAT, FOX, MAGPIE, AND CROWS THAT DO AN UNBELIEVEABLE JOB, AND IN THE MEAN TIME HAVE A VERY LITTLE TO NO EFFECT ON ELK, DEER, MOOSE, AND SHEEP.  YOU ARE FULL OF OPINIONS AND NO FACTS.  ALL YOUR POSTS ARE FILLED WITH WHAT "YOU BELIEVE" AND WHAT "YOU THINK" WILL HAPPEN.  OPEN YOU EYES AND AT LEAST DO ALL OF US A FAVOR AND SEARCH FOR THE NEGATIVES ON THE INTERNET OF THESE ANIMALS BECAUSE YOU OBVIOUSLY HAVE NOT.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9609
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #211 on: January 02, 2012, 11:34:15 PM »
he hasnt addressed anything on here..just avoids them..I personally think he is just stirring the pot

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3391
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #212 on: January 05, 2012, 01:01:22 PM »
he hasnt addressed anything on here..just avoids them..I personally think he is just stirring the pot

Really? I see you guys screaming for facts, but when I post them, you overlook them. Facts aren't very convenient when they disagree with you are they?

I already showed how hunter harvest for deer and elk has gone up as wolves increased in Montana. And I showed that while deer harvest dropped a bit in Idaho, (mainly from back to back bad winters) The elk harvest has remained fairly steady as wolf numbers grow.  And I pointed out the Idaho biology report on elk that has very in depth analysis on wolves and habitat and the history of elk in Idaho.    https://research.idfg.idaho.gov/wildlife/Wildlife%20Technical%20Reports/Elk%20Statewide%20PR10.pdf  This report also shows that there was a problem with the elk herds before the wolves were ever released in Yellowstone in units such as Lolo due to habitat issues.

Since you don't want to educate yourselves, I'll help you.  We'll take a look at Wisconsin deer hunting since wolves have found their way back there from Minnesota.

Here's an interesting link from the Wisconsin DNR.    http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/er/mammals/wolf/wolf_facts.htm#History%20in%20Wisconsin

And a couple quotes from it.

("Before Wisconsin was settled in the 1830s, wolves lived throughout the state. Nobody knows how many wolves there were, but best estimates would be 3,000-5,000 animals. Explorers, trappers and settlers transformed Wisconsin's native habitat into farmland, hunted elk and bison to extirpation, and reduced deer populations. As their prey species declined, wolves began to feed on easy-to-capture livestock. As might be expected, this was unpopular among farmers.")

Hmmm I see another common theme here, humans wiping out everything in their path.

("By 1960, wolves were declared extirpated from Wisconsin. Ironically, studies have shown that wolves have minimal negative impact on deer populations, since they feed primarily on weak, sick, or disabled individuals.")

I know I know, they also kill healthy animals when they can't find any weak ones.  So? They do what they need to do to eat.  They also eat lots of small game and varmints.

("By 1960, few wolves remained in the lower 48 states (only 350-500 in Minnesota and about 20 on Isle Royale in Michigan). In 1974, however, the value of timber wolves was recognized on the federal level and they were given protection under the Endangered Species Act (Exit DNR). With protection, the Minnesota wolf population in-creased and several individuals dispersed into northern Wisconsin in the mid-1970s. In 1975, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources declared timber wolves endangered. A wolf research program was initiated in 1979.")

OK, so by the mid 70's wolves were making a comeback in Wisconsin from wolves that dispersed there from Minnesota. I have another link that provides a nice chronology of deer hunting in Wisconsin. http://host.madison.com/sports/recreation/outdoors/article_66e3c206-ed41-11df-a141-001cc4c002e0.html   It shows that in 1978 while wolves were gaining a foothold in Wisconsin, 150,845 deer were taken by hunters.  The DNR fact sheet show that the population of wolves there has grown to about 650 at present. So if all you anti wolf people are correct, Wisconsin's deer population should have plummeted from that point forward and hunting should be ruined forever.  Let's see how that went then? Again on the chronology link we find that the harvest in Wisconsin went up to over 255,000 in 1984. (I must be cherry picking again, right?) Then by 1990 it was an all time record of over 350,000. (lots of cherries on that tree to pick)

Then in 1992 we have this.....

("1992 -- Though kill fourth highest on record, 288,820, many hunters voice discontent over lack of success and claim DNR raised expectations by pre-hunt harvest prediction of around 370,000")

Those ungrateful hunters.... 4th highest year ever and they're complaining....Must be the wolves right?

Whoops! in 1995 it was up to 398,000 harvested deer. What is going on here? This has to be smoke and mirrors......

It drops a little for a couple years then.....2000 a record 528,000 and change are killed. Yessireebob, wolves are ruining hunting in Wisconsin.

In 2004, hunters are required to kill a doe before they can harvest a buck and over 400,000 does are harvested. This herd is getting out of control. In 2007( "402,563 deer killed during all gun seasons is the third highest total on record" ) In spite of all the effort to reduce the herd.

By 2009, they are getting the herd back under control and the harvest was around 242,000.

It must have been those darn wolves!  Because we all know when there are wolves around, the deer population goes down. It has to....... because wolves eat deer, It has to. It has to. That's the only thing that makes sense!

Time to get your heads out of the sand fellows.






A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline villageidiot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 430
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #213 on: January 05, 2012, 01:06:25 PM »
OK Sitka.   You convinced us that wolves don't eat deer or elk.  They just eat dirt to survive.  We believe that because you gave us some links that prove it.  How about the hundreds and even thousands of sheep and cattle they DO eat?  How do we prevent that? 

Offline wraithen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2041
  • Location: JBLMish
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #214 on: January 05, 2012, 01:09:06 PM »
I get it! So all the numbers you posted prove without a doubt that more wolves equals more deer and elk! That's amazing! I guess they help nurse the young for the deer and elk and teach them to forage and frolic? This is awesome news! Let's try to have the first state with a million wolves. Then we could just walk around with a knife and get deer and elk anytime we wanted!
the head has been lopped of the eagle.our country has become a nation of losers,them that feed on the teet and can do no more than suckle from them that toil. ~ Rasbo

Offline Gringo31

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5607
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #215 on: January 05, 2012, 01:13:15 PM »
I think I understand but can't seem to figure out what happened to the elk in Yellowstone?
We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.
-Ronald Reagan

Online JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14537
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #216 on: January 05, 2012, 01:13:38 PM »
correlation is not always causation.  Either for increased harvest or declining herds.

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3391
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #217 on: January 05, 2012, 01:17:13 PM »
I get it! So all the numbers you posted prove without a doubt that more wolves equals more deer and elk! That's amazing!

Nope. But they do show that wolves don't automatically mean bad news for hunters. I could show you the same thing in Michigan or in Minnesota. In fact even with large hunter harvests and a pretty large wolf kill of deer, (Minnesota has about 3,000 wolves) Minnesota managers are still concerned about controling deer numbers. (not wolf numbers)

http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/200211/18_steilm_deerherd/
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline Broken Arrow

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 903
  • Location: Richland
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #218 on: January 05, 2012, 01:22:17 PM »
After reading the entire report from the link you posted for the Idaho Department of Fish and Wildlife, I am throughly convinsed you either need glasses, did not read the report, or refuse to comprehend 99% of which you did not "choose" to comment on.

Offline Gringo31

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5607
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #219 on: January 05, 2012, 01:27:21 PM »
So many things are screwed up with your line of thinking here Sitka....

Washington doesn't exactly have a deer or elk problem.  We have the most elk hunters per elk in the West.  We also do not have massive tracts of land that are remote.

If wolves don't automatically mean "bad news for hunters" are you making the argument it could be good?  Or can you honestly make the statement that you really believe that this will have a net zero difference to our game populations?

Let me ask you this way....real simple...

Do you believe in predator management?  Why or why not?
We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.
-Ronald Reagan

Offline wraithen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2041
  • Location: JBLMish
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #220 on: January 05, 2012, 01:31:44 PM »
Gringo I asked a page or two ago. He said we can kill em.
the head has been lopped of the eagle.our country has become a nation of losers,them that feed on the teet and can do no more than suckle from them that toil. ~ Rasbo

Offline Gringo31

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5607
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #221 on: January 05, 2012, 01:36:18 PM »
I want the why or why not part  :chuckle:
We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.
-Ronald Reagan

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3391
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #222 on: January 05, 2012, 02:07:30 PM »
After reading the entire report from the link you posted for the Idaho Department of Fish and Wildlife, I am throughly convinsed you either need glasses, did not read the report, or refuse to comprehend 99% of which you did not "choose" to comment on.

Be specific.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3391
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #223 on: January 05, 2012, 02:16:20 PM »
So many things are screwed up with your line of thinking here Sitka....

Washington doesn't exactly have a deer or elk problem.  We have the most elk hunters per elk in the West.  We also do not have massive tracts of land that are remote.

Habitat, habitat, habitat. You're going to have issues like this as long as the human population continues to grow.

Do you believe in predator management?  Why or why not?

I don't have a problem with it  where it can be shown to have a beneficial effect. I have no problem with taking out wolves that threaten farm animals or humans. I have no problem with trapping them or hunting them. And in the case where there is good habitat, but something like a bad winter reduced the prey animals, a temporary reduction in predators to jump start a recovery can be acceptable. 

Bottom line, if you don't have the habitat, you won't have the herds you want.



A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline wraithen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2041
  • Location: JBLMish
Re: Deer and Elk Hunting in Idaho and Montana After Wolf Introduction
« Reply #224 on: January 05, 2012, 02:18:58 PM »
So since we don't have the habitat habitat habitat, will the wolves still increase increase increase our herds? What will they do that benefits us?
the head has been lopped of the eagle.our country has become a nation of losers,them that feed on the teet and can do no more than suckle from them that toil. ~ Rasbo

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

New York deer by Bearhunter308
[Today at 10:14:19 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Today at 10:02:50 PM]


DIY Ucluelet trip by metlhead
[Today at 09:40:00 PM]


Survey in ? by metlhead
[Today at 09:35:57 PM]


Alaska Fishing Guide and Lodge Recommendations by Tbar
[Today at 09:31:49 PM]


Colorado Results by cem3434
[Today at 08:35:51 PM]


NEED ADVICE: LATE after JUNE 15th IDAHO BEAR by Sliverslinger
[Today at 08:31:23 PM]


Resetting dash warning lights by Sandberm
[Today at 08:13:27 PM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by Mossy
[Today at 06:17:02 PM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Special T
[Today at 05:52:28 PM]


Oregon spring bear by Fidelk
[Today at 04:58:27 PM]


Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents by idahohuntr
[Today at 01:51:40 PM]


Seekins PH2 & Element sale by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 12:40:26 PM]


Kokanee Fishing Tournament!! 🎣 June 13-14, Joseph OR by WRKG4GD
[Today at 11:42:02 AM]


wings wings and more wings! by birddogdad
[Today at 11:00:11 AM]


Jim Horn's elk calling, instructional audio CD's. by WapitiTalk1
[Today at 09:46:03 AM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by link
[Today at 07:00:33 AM]


CVA Optima V2 durasight rail mod by craigapphunt
[Today at 05:56:00 AM]


Last year putting in… by wa.hunter
[Yesterday at 11:02:00 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:34:36 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal