collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.  (Read 4121 times)

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
WDFW are going to kill off all but 250,000 early coho and all but 250,000 late coho over on the Hump hatchery.  The fry will be released into duck lake as they do not have the resourses to feed them until smolt stage =$25,000.00 and cannot release them into the river @ a fry stage.  25,000 is not much money since the process is partly completed. 

Please call Ron Warren @ region 6 and blow up the phones 360-249-4628.  Ron reports to Jo Wadsworth (360-902-2325) who reports to Jim Scott (Director of Fish for DFW, 360-902-2736).



« Last Edit: March 07, 2012, 07:45:29 PM by TheHunt »
275 down 2

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2012, 07:40:21 PM »
Where did you hear this?

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2012, 07:45:53 PM »
I heard it from another fishermen. Then I called down there and it is true.  Please call down there and verify yourself.   The more phone calls the better.
275 down 2

Online benhuntin

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 2582
  • Location: NUNYA
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2012, 07:47:42 PM »
Sound right up WDFW's alley  :bash: :bash:
If it aint broke, dont fix it.

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #4 on: March 07, 2012, 07:49:39 PM »
This is the comment from Ron Warren:

The reductions are actually due to the reduced budgets coming into 11/13 biennium. The original reduction was to eliminate the Chinook program 500,000 and a coho reduction of 730,000, down to 240,000. Director Anderson, Jim Scott and I met with about twenty constituents that came to a meeting organized by Superfly in Hoquiam last October and the reduction was modified. We heard very clearly that everyone there wanted us to save the Chinook program, done. We also modified the coho reduction to keep 500,000 (250,000 normal timed and 250,000 lates). In an effort to try and fund the new buy back we worked with a group and the Quinault Nation, who agreed to fund the fish food need of $25,000. The group have stated that they would organize volunteers to do the mass marking this spring, huge commitment. This fish being suggested for Duck Lake are fry that resulted from egg takes prior to the reduction being implemented, now in excess of funding. Bottom line is that the agency did not have the funding for this program since July 1st, 2011, the start of biennium.
275 down 2

Offline wraithen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2041
  • Location: JBLMish
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #5 on: March 07, 2012, 08:25:56 PM »
This is the comment from Ron Warren:

The reductions are actually due to the reduced budgets coming into 11/13 biennium. The original reduction was to eliminate the Chinook program 500,000 and a coho reduction of 730,000, down to 240,000. Director Anderson, Jim Scott and I met with about twenty constituents that came to a meeting organized by Superfly in Hoquiam last October and the reduction was modified. We heard very clearly that everyone there wanted us to save the Chinook program, done. We also modified the coho reduction to keep 500,000 (250,000 normal timed and 250,000 lates). In an effort to try and fund the new buy back we worked with a group and the Quinault Nation, who agreed to fund the fish food need of $25,000. The group have stated that they would organize volunteers to do the mass marking this spring, huge commitment. This fish being suggested for Duck Lake are fry that resulted from egg takes prior to the reduction being implemented, now in excess of funding. Bottom line is that the agency did not have the funding for this program since July 1st, 2011, the start of biennium.
the head has been lopped of the eagle.our country has become a nation of losers,them that feed on the teet and can do no more than suckle from them that toil. ~ Rasbo

Offline pjb3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1234
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2012, 09:19:54 PM »
I know the president of everett trout and salmon club and why donate them? I'll ask him
I know tehy have their own hatchery too

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2012, 09:07:11 AM »
Bump

Offline saylean

  • Team Slayer Packmule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 8380
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2012, 09:33:08 AM »
Send the info to news channels. Maybe one of them will pick it up.

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #9 on: March 08, 2012, 10:11:38 AM »
Sounds like they are going to dump them in Duck Lake.   Duck Lake has lots of bass in it so it will feed the bass I guess.
275 down 2

Offline money794

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 99
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #10 on: March 08, 2012, 07:51:29 PM »
*censored*es :bash: :bash: :bash: :bdid: :bdid: :bdid:

Offline Hilltop123

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 2097
  • Location: Up on the Ump
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #11 on: March 10, 2012, 09:55:57 AM »
Stupid question........If they don't want the expense of feeding the smolt, and will dump them in a lake, then why not dump them in the river and let them take there chances.....If they were raised at the hatchery, then in therory they should come back to the hatchery to spawn, correct?  Why release them in a lake?

Offline Moose22

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 373
  • Location: Sequim, Wa
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #12 on: March 10, 2012, 11:00:26 AM »
Stupid question........If they don't want the expense of feeding the smolt, and will dump them in a lake, then why not dump them in the river and let them take there chances.....If they were raised at the hatchery, then in therory they should come back to the hatchery to spawn, correct?  Why release them in a lake?

I agree, never have understood some of the decisions made.
"Live life like a song..." Jimmy Buffet

Offline money794

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 99
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2012, 05:18:21 PM »
because there not smart enough lol there all dumb and there tree huggers  :chuckle: :chuckle:

Stupid question........If they don't want the expense of feeding the smolt, and will dump them in a lake, then why not dump them in the river and let them take there chances.....If they were raised at the hatchery, then in therory they should come back to the hatchery to spawn, correct?  Why release them in a lake?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Pinks! by C-Money
[Today at 02:56:56 PM]


Montana general deer by MADMAX
[Today at 02:29:21 PM]


Muzzleloader scope options by MADMAX
[Today at 02:26:44 PM]


Pork belly street tacos….. by 92xj
[Today at 01:54:57 PM]


More Kings! by CP
[Today at 12:39:12 PM]


High buck hunt by Ridgerunner
[Today at 12:31:09 PM]


Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by elkslayer069
[Today at 12:20:51 PM]


Pogue (233) Deer Tag by rmadsen
[Today at 11:28:24 AM]


Hoof Rot by PsoasHunter
[Today at 11:08:08 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 09:52:46 PM]


Antelope next year? by jstone
[Yesterday at 07:39:59 PM]


Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 06:29:43 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Yesterday at 06:09:07 PM]


2025 OILS! by Whitenuckles
[Yesterday at 05:16:45 PM]


2024 Quality Buck coming home by Whitenuckles
[Yesterday at 05:10:28 PM]


Alaska 2025 by Whitenuckles
[Yesterday at 05:09:18 PM]


Do folks run their refrigerators on Propane while towing their RV's? by huntandjeep
[Yesterday at 04:11:54 PM]


Tooth age on Quinault bull by nwwanderer
[Yesterday at 04:02:04 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal