collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.  (Read 4079 times)

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
WDFW are going to kill off all but 250,000 early coho and all but 250,000 late coho over on the Hump hatchery.  The fry will be released into duck lake as they do not have the resourses to feed them until smolt stage =$25,000.00 and cannot release them into the river @ a fry stage.  25,000 is not much money since the process is partly completed. 

Please call Ron Warren @ region 6 and blow up the phones 360-249-4628.  Ron reports to Jo Wadsworth (360-902-2325) who reports to Jim Scott (Director of Fish for DFW, 360-902-2736).



« Last Edit: March 07, 2012, 07:45:29 PM by TheHunt »
275 down 2

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2012, 07:40:21 PM »
Where did you hear this?

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2012, 07:45:53 PM »
I heard it from another fishermen. Then I called down there and it is true.  Please call down there and verify yourself.   The more phone calls the better.
275 down 2

Online benhuntin

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 2581
  • Location: NUNYA
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2012, 07:47:42 PM »
Sound right up WDFW's alley  :bash: :bash:
If it aint broke, dont fix it.

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #4 on: March 07, 2012, 07:49:39 PM »
This is the comment from Ron Warren:

The reductions are actually due to the reduced budgets coming into 11/13 biennium. The original reduction was to eliminate the Chinook program 500,000 and a coho reduction of 730,000, down to 240,000. Director Anderson, Jim Scott and I met with about twenty constituents that came to a meeting organized by Superfly in Hoquiam last October and the reduction was modified. We heard very clearly that everyone there wanted us to save the Chinook program, done. We also modified the coho reduction to keep 500,000 (250,000 normal timed and 250,000 lates). In an effort to try and fund the new buy back we worked with a group and the Quinault Nation, who agreed to fund the fish food need of $25,000. The group have stated that they would organize volunteers to do the mass marking this spring, huge commitment. This fish being suggested for Duck Lake are fry that resulted from egg takes prior to the reduction being implemented, now in excess of funding. Bottom line is that the agency did not have the funding for this program since July 1st, 2011, the start of biennium.
275 down 2

Offline wraithen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2041
  • Location: JBLMish
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #5 on: March 07, 2012, 08:25:56 PM »
This is the comment from Ron Warren:

The reductions are actually due to the reduced budgets coming into 11/13 biennium. The original reduction was to eliminate the Chinook program 500,000 and a coho reduction of 730,000, down to 240,000. Director Anderson, Jim Scott and I met with about twenty constituents that came to a meeting organized by Superfly in Hoquiam last October and the reduction was modified. We heard very clearly that everyone there wanted us to save the Chinook program, done. We also modified the coho reduction to keep 500,000 (250,000 normal timed and 250,000 lates). In an effort to try and fund the new buy back we worked with a group and the Quinault Nation, who agreed to fund the fish food need of $25,000. The group have stated that they would organize volunteers to do the mass marking this spring, huge commitment. This fish being suggested for Duck Lake are fry that resulted from egg takes prior to the reduction being implemented, now in excess of funding. Bottom line is that the agency did not have the funding for this program since July 1st, 2011, the start of biennium.
the head has been lopped of the eagle.our country has become a nation of losers,them that feed on the teet and can do no more than suckle from them that toil. ~ Rasbo

Offline pjb3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1234
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2012, 09:19:54 PM »
I know the president of everett trout and salmon club and why donate them? I'll ask him
I know tehy have their own hatchery too

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2012, 09:07:11 AM »
Bump

Offline saylean

  • Team Slayer Packmule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 8380
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2012, 09:33:08 AM »
Send the info to news channels. Maybe one of them will pick it up.

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #9 on: March 08, 2012, 10:11:38 AM »
Sounds like they are going to dump them in Duck Lake.   Duck Lake has lots of bass in it so it will feed the bass I guess.
275 down 2

Offline money794

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 99
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #10 on: March 08, 2012, 07:51:29 PM »
*censored*es :bash: :bash: :bash: :bdid: :bdid: :bdid:

Offline Hilltop123

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 2096
  • Location: Up on the Ump
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #11 on: March 10, 2012, 09:55:57 AM »
Stupid question........If they don't want the expense of feeding the smolt, and will dump them in a lake, then why not dump them in the river and let them take there chances.....If they were raised at the hatchery, then in therory they should come back to the hatchery to spawn, correct?  Why release them in a lake?

Offline Moose22

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 373
  • Location: Sequim, Wa
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #12 on: March 10, 2012, 11:00:26 AM »
Stupid question........If they don't want the expense of feeding the smolt, and will dump them in a lake, then why not dump them in the river and let them take there chances.....If they were raised at the hatchery, then in therory they should come back to the hatchery to spawn, correct?  Why release them in a lake?

I agree, never have understood some of the decisions made.
"Live life like a song..." Jimmy Buffet

Offline money794

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 99
Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2012, 05:18:21 PM »
because there not smart enough lol there all dumb and there tree huggers  :chuckle: :chuckle:

Stupid question........If they don't want the expense of feeding the smolt, and will dump them in a lake, then why not dump them in the river and let them take there chances.....If they were raised at the hatchery, then in therory they should come back to the hatchery to spawn, correct?  Why release them in a lake?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Today at 02:08:31 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 01:52:01 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 01:27:16 PM]


Blue Mtn Foothills West Rifle Tag by Trooper
[Today at 01:18:40 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Dave Workman
[Today at 01:01:22 PM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by bearpaw
[Today at 12:02:58 PM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by jrebel
[Today at 11:20:33 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Today at 11:12:46 AM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 11:07:43 AM]


Modified game cart... 🛒 by Dan-o
[Today at 08:44:37 AM]


Velvet by Brute
[Today at 08:37:08 AM]


Calling Bears by hunter399
[Today at 06:12:44 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Today at 05:43:11 AM]


Lizard Cam by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 04:48:54 AM]


Pocket Carry by Westside88
[Yesterday at 09:33:35 PM]


2025 Coyotes by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:15:03 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by Yeti419
[Yesterday at 06:11:55 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 02:14:23 PM]


2025 Crab! by Stein
[Yesterday at 01:48:55 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by Kales15
[Yesterday at 01:04:52 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal