BBC Methow Wolf Documentary Posted

[TheHunt]

THose fools do NOT want hunting.  They are planning on saying that hunting is NOT needed any more as the wolves are keeping the balance. 

[whuppinstick]

I haven't watched the film yet but it appears they are...

You should watch the films.

[Alchase]

Code 6328?


Isn't this the video that was supposed to show Idabooner's interview?

I guess they couldn't get me to say what they wanted to hear.  LOL

I was looking forward to your interview. That was during all the denial by the WDFW.

[bearpaw]

Somehow I missed this topic.
I am in no way surprised that they make locals look like the bad guys, I expected that.

What I find the most interesting is that this video shows wolves in numerous locations of the north cascades. At the time this was filmed wasn't the WDFW still claiming there was only one wolf pack in the cascades and that there were only two wolves left in the lookout pack?

Here is video proof here that at the time this was filmed they knew there were wolves in several locations in north central WA. I question the timing of their knowledge that additional wolves existed and their continued claims that there are so few wolves in WA until only recently. How many more wolves has WDFW known about that they have refused to admit existed.

[DIYARCHERYJUNKIE]

I just watched it.  Just what I expected after watching five mins the other day.  They don't show both respective sides of the argument by any means.  As you said bearpaw that was expected.  But I thought the same thing when the self proclaimed wolf expert howled three times and the woods lit up like wolve haven?  If there scientist can locate that many in a few days an they've been collared that far down for this long this is proff tha wdfw has been lying to us for years.  It needs to be addressed and asked why.  The wdfw needs to own up. The forest service guy on there acts like wolves will stay where we want them.  That will not be the case giving pro woofers all sorts of control tactics to lobby against and make us look like exterminators of the wolves that touch there hearts with there death howls.

[humanure]

The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.

[seth30]

The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.

Do grizzly bears and wolverines get the same denial by WDFW? 

[humanure]

I don't work for the department, so i do not know.

[seth30]

I don't work for the department, so i do not know.

hmmm but you know about them keeping wolf data from us

Topic Summary
Posted by: humanure
« on: Today at 11:57:23 AM » Insert Quote

You are ignoring this user. Show me the post.
I don't work for the department, so i do not know.
Posted by: seth30
« on: Today at 11:56:16 AM » Insert Quote
Quote from: humanure on Today at 11:43:35 AM
The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.
Do grizzly bears and wolverines get the same denial by WDFW? 
Posted by: humanure
« on: Today at 11:43:35 AM » Insert Quote

You are ignoring this user. 
The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.

[humanure]

It's that I know something people don't, it's just logical and common sense.

[seth30]

It's that I know something people don't, it's just logical and common sense.

Oh wow you have ESP, maybe you could start your own hotline and charge people 2.99 a minute

[humanure]

*roll's eye's*

[bearpaw]

The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.

So you are suggesting it's legitimate, perfectly OK for the WDFW to lie to the people?

Very few people call the WDFW the "department" unless they are employees, exactly who are you humanure, why do you call yourself "humanure" and why do you incite people to make the worst comments about wolves?

[humanure]

I don't agree that they maintained that there was only one pack. They should have been more vague about what they said. I do agree that, yes, it is legitimate to withhold information for the sake of safety, preventing unlawfulness, etc.

I am just a guy who raises German Shepherds, runs around the mountains, fishes, hunt's and volunteer's at a sheep/cattle farm and injured wildlife rehab's and sanctuaries. I don't work for the department.

I call myself 'Humanure' because it's my favorite Cattle Decapitation album. I might incite people to say things, but it takes two to tango. It's certain comments that incite me to voice my opinion and idea's.

[TWG2A]

The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.

So you are suggesting it's legitimate, perfectly OK for the WDFW to lie to the people?

Very few people call the WDFW the "department" unless they are employees, exactly who are you humanure, why do you call yourself "humanure" and why do you incite people to make the worst comments about wolves?

Far too may glassy eyeds have no idea who works for whom.  The "Department" is accountable TOTALLY to We, The People.  Not We, the glassy eyed MOB.