collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season  (Read 3751 times)

Offline duckmen1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2554
  • Location: outdoors
electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« on: April 16, 2012, 04:40:28 PM »
wdfw finalized there decision to keep the electronic decoys banned from waterfowl hunting.
this was just posted under latest news on the wdfw website.
they also kept luminocks banned from archery hunting.
Maturity is when you have the power to destroy someone who did you wrong but instead you breathe, walk away, and let life take care of them.

Offline AWS

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1838
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2012, 05:12:56 PM »
Well at least they didn't ban the new lead compensating fire control sight system with hen differentiator, if it's in range it's dead and no mistake hens.  E-decoys I can live without.
After the first shot the rest are just noise.

Make mine a Minaska

Offline ICEMAN

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 15575
  • Location: Olympia
  • The opinionated one... Y.A.R. Exec. Staff
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2012, 06:07:42 PM »
wdfw finalized there decision to keep the electronic decoys banned from waterfowl hunting.
this was just posted under latest news on the wdfw website.
they also kept luminocks banned from archery hunting.

This should really impress alot of hunters... :bash:
molṑn labé

A Knuckle Draggin Neanderthal Meat Head

Kill your television....do it now.....

Don't make me hurt you.

“I don't feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.”  John Wayne

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2012, 09:49:25 PM »
I'm glad they kept the ban.

Offline steeleywhopper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1669
  • Location: Snohomish co.
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2012, 09:53:16 PM »
If it's legal in other states it should be legal here as well.
Politicians like Jay Inslee are the reason we have the 2nd Amendment

Offline johnnyaustin44

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 1124
  • Location: Arlington
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2012, 10:05:42 PM »
I'm glad as well. Yeah dealing with other options for wing movement can be a real pain sometimes but when its working it makes all th difference. everyone would have a battery operated decoy if they became legal which in turn would make hunting without one on public land would be almost pointless to try and compete with all the guys who have multiple. glad they kept it how it is

Offline muzbuster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 483
  • Location: Pierce Co.
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2012, 09:23:27 AM »
Well at least they didn't ban the new lead compensating fire control sight system with hen differentiator, if it's in range it's dead and no mistake hens.  E-decoys I can live without.
:lol4:  lmao!

Offline duckdog98604

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 34
  • Location: WA
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2012, 11:45:48 AM »
I'm glad they kept the ban.

 :tup:  :tup: 
100% Freelance Hunter....

Offline seth30

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 6438
  • Location: Whidbey Island
  • It's time to HUNT!
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #8 on: April 24, 2012, 04:42:14 PM »
Im glad as well.  Too MANY slob hunter's out there on the marsh's and ponds that leave there trash, and spent shell's.  If they allow it, then you can add batteries to the trash pile as well. :twocents:  The lighnted nocks on the other hand, I just dont understand that?? 
Rather be dead than cool.
Kurt Cobain

Offline h2ofowlr

  • CHOKED UP TIGHT
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 9120
  • Location: In the "Blind"! Go Cougs!
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #9 on: April 25, 2012, 03:25:14 PM »
Someguys just can't get those birds without complexes and electronic decoys.  How do you think they feel, spending all that money and still sucking.  Common give them a break.   :lol4:
Cut em!
It's not the shells!  It's the shooter!

Offline seth30

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 6438
  • Location: Whidbey Island
  • It's time to HUNT!
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2012, 03:30:45 PM »
 :llam:
Rather be dead than cool.
Kurt Cobain

Offline duckkillerclyde

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 119
  • Location: Pacific Wonderland
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #11 on: May 03, 2012, 11:57:54 PM »
I don't use electronic decoys nor would I if they were legal but all of that being said I wish they were legal. 

We have to have laws that protect people and their property but some laws we could do without.  All the outlawing of electronic decoys has done is create bigger government.  :tup:

Offline Chase 1

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 359
  • Location: Snohomish County
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #12 on: May 04, 2012, 12:29:14 AM »
IMO this could have past had limitations been written into the rule...two per spread regardless of party size...or something like that? I think the sticking point was the fear of a "robo spread" on Golden Pond. Lively debate at the Commission vote, at least a couple may have voted the other way had limits been in place. Not sure it would have got the 5 needed but it would have been closer. I would expect to see this one again, but with limits.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 12:35:03 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Today at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Today at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Today at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Today at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Today at 06:35:57 AM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by addicted1
[Yesterday at 09:02:37 PM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Yesterday at 05:42:19 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 12:43:12 PM]


2025 Crab! by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 11:09:27 AM]


erronulvin trail cam photos by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 10:19:35 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal