Free: Contests & Raffles.
It was when the state started transplanting
Wolves have been in this state for years... crossing back and forth from Canada to start with.... It was when the state started transplanting but still denying, that it became an issue of believability.
I personally believe the wolves we are dealing with originated in the yellowstone reintroduction as well. That being said the state severly abrogated their responsiblities in identifying, and managing wolves until they became a problem they couldn't ignore. Cenci says it in the article "Who knows how many wolves were poached before our agency agreed to recognize they were present" I think that its easy for allot of people who haven't seen the impact wolves are having to write them off as a necessary part of our ecosystem. When in fact they are doing harm in many area's that with a continued presence of wolves may never recover. Unfortunately as in the case with that cougar in CA you cannot convince someone who's ideas on ecosystems, and wildlife management are based on what they have seen in a Disney cartoon rather than real life science.
Good points.
Quote from: Huntbear on May 23, 2012, 09:26:58 AMWolves have been in this state for years... crossing back and forth from Canada to start with.... It was when the state started transplanting but still denying, that it became an issue of believability.I don't believe this because it would be professional suicide to have done it. If you can prove that wolves were transplanted, you've got your solution to changing over the management of the DFW. They'd be fired immediately, anyone involved all the way to the top. Criminal charges would be filed. There's a very specific procedure to follow and they just haven't had the budget to do it. There's never been any need for transplanting. The movement of wolves from Yellowstone, Alberta, BC and ID is well documented through radio collars. With all of these populations increasing at a rate of 30%= plus per year, they have all the wolves they need moving into WA.I'm not trying to start a pissing match with people on the same side of the fence as me on this issue, Huntbear. But I've personally interviewed representatives from the DFW, the USFWS, the NFS, and the NPS about that specific question and don't believe there have been transplants in WA, at least not by the authorities in WA or the feds. Hybrids and wolf Haven types wolves - could be another story altogether.
Quote from: humanure on May 24, 2012, 02:14:39 PMGood points.Uh oh humanure is back.....lol
They lost thier trust from me. Time to clean house... Look up some of Wolfbaits posts. He has posted lots of articles from newspapers around the area on the west side that talk about wolf sitings.
Quote from: JODakota on May 24, 2012, 02:39:00 PMQuote from: humanure on May 24, 2012, 02:14:39 PMGood points.Uh oh humanure is back.....lolYep- everyone get ready for some serious enlightenment. WDFW did not put wolves in WA. The genetics are really clear...they have been here for a while, and they have bee moving here for a while...on their own.
Quote from: Special T on May 23, 2012, 03:32:19 PM They lost thier trust from me. Time to clean house... Look up some of Wolfbaits posts. He has posted lots of articles from newspapers around the area on the west side that talk about wolf sitings. Agreed
The wolfer meeeting I attended in Yakima last fall was full of I do not know and how could this happen from the WDFW. They openly discussed that they felt no management would need to occur before 2020. Many still feel the same.
Quote from: Huntbear on May 23, 2012, 09:26:58 AMIt was when the state started transplanting The fact that you guys still push this baseless, proofless rumor is beyond me.
Well you are referring to his claims of wolves being transplanted... I'm referring to the VOLUMES of news articles that talked about wolves. Especially the ones that talked about wolves in WA during the period that the state said there was none... I won't argue the case about transplanting here in WA. What i would argue is that we had wolves here before this so called "recovery". That and the "Experimental transplant" of wolves to YNP did not use the same kinds of wolves that are/were in the Rockies and Cascaides. To me it is like trying to convince someone that a steel head is the same as a Chinook salmon... Yes they are both salmonoids but they are not the same... The state recognizes the differences in salmon but not for wolves... I personally think it is irrelevant to argue if they are transplanted... I think the ESA is about $$$ for lawyers, and activism for wacko environmentalists... I think to really solve the issue we new 2 things.. Rob McKenna as Gov, and to scrap the ESA.
Yes WE ALL believe that the state planted some here.
Quote from: humanure on May 24, 2012, 12:47:37 PMQuote from: Huntbear on May 23, 2012, 09:26:58 AMIt was when the state started transplanting The fact that you guys still push this baseless, proofless rumor is beyond me.They collared a wolf in the northeast part of Washington 2 years ago. Took a DNA sample and thew DNA goes back to a pack in the Grand Teton National Park. That's an awful long ways for a wolf to travel on it's own without help. Yes WE ALL believe that the state planted some here.
Quote from: GrainfedMuley on May 29, 2012, 06:54:18 AMQuote from: humanure on May 24, 2012, 12:47:37 PMQuote from: Huntbear on May 23, 2012, 09:26:58 AMIt was when the state started transplanting The fact that you guys still push this baseless, proofless rumor is beyond me.They collared a wolf in the northeast part of Washington 2 years ago. Took a DNA sample and thew DNA goes back to a pack in the Grand Teton National Park. That's an awful long ways for a wolf to travel on it's own without help. Yes WE ALL believe that the state planted some here.Not sure what you mean by we. I don't believe it. And wolves can travel a thousand miles or more on their own, in a relatively short period of time.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on May 29, 2012, 07:45:02 AMQuote from: GrainfedMuley on May 29, 2012, 06:54:18 AMQuote from: humanure on May 24, 2012, 12:47:37 PMQuote from: Huntbear on May 23, 2012, 09:26:58 AMIt was when the state started transplanting The fact that you guys still push this baseless, proofless rumor is beyond me.They collared a wolf in the northeast part of Washington 2 years ago. Took a DNA sample and thew DNA goes back to a pack in the Grand Teton National Park. That's an awful long ways for a wolf to travel on it's own without help. Yes WE ALL believe that the state planted some here.Not sure what you mean by we. I don't believe it. And wolves can travel a thousand miles or more on their own, in a relatively short period of time.OK, wrong wording........I believe the state planted wolves. This liberal state, it would not suprise me at all.
I think it is a more usefull and profitable argument that the wolves transported to YNP were not done properly. The USFS did not follow the proper steps OR reintroduce the proper kind of wolf to the area... As a result the few wolves that were here were overrun by these competing canines... We should make the argument that because of this there should be open season on them.
First off i disagree with the 90% lib statement. There are lots of people who vote for the Big D because they are union, or they always have... You will NEVER change their mind if you don't try. I would argue that it is the metro areas that are the most ignorant, and while they make a a huge portion of the population in this state it is not even close to 90%.