Free: Contests & Raffles.
I'm not far off the banning of catch and release for salmonoid fish case in point was fishing in BC couple years ago, clipped fin fish could be kept but intact had to be released. So we'd catch five intact fish for every clipped fish. Of the five released per one kept maybe one or two would survive, seals and sharks would eat the rest. stupid
Remember, Constitutional rights to hunt and fish must also include responsible wildlife management through sound and unbiased science to ensure healthy and sustainable wildlife populations. That means there must be season setting, bag limits, specific numbers of permits issued, etc. That is, the laws and practices currently in place to manage our wildlife will likely stay the same. The difference is that the "privileges" will change to State Constitutional "rights"; that change will provide greater protections for our hunting and fishing heritage for generations to come.To give everyone an idea of the wording used in different state Constitutions, please take a look at this list provided by the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF):https://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/StateRighttoHunFish.pdfThe timing may not be right for Washington yet, but the more we learn about how other states have done it and the wording they have used, the better positioned we will be when the time does come. There is a lot involved in such an endeavor so proper planning, and getting the right people and organizations involved will be essential. It can also be a very expensive undertaking. We may be a few years off, but keep this on your radar and learn as much as you can about making it happen. That's why the updates continue to be posted.