collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp  (Read 175521 times)

Offline JBar

  • The Family "Guide"
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2135
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #135 on: January 02, 2013, 03:41:54 AM »
185 Goal is 170 but would really like to hit 165. 
Shut up and Hunt!

Offline 92xj

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 4051
  • Location: Out of Place
  • Kill 'em
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #136 on: January 02, 2013, 05:20:23 AM »
241 so, there's all the weight I lost last year.  Goal by June 1st. 200.  Opener of archery, 185.
"If you have to be crazy to hunt ducks, I do not wish to be sane."

Offline skipper

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 445
  • Location: Enumclaw
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #137 on: January 02, 2013, 06:17:29 AM »
260 goal is 200
« Last Edit: January 02, 2013, 06:44:10 AM by skipper »

Offline Machias

  • Trapper
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 18956
  • Location: Worley, ID
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #138 on: January 02, 2013, 06:27:15 AM »
We should have the chart up sometime this evening with everyone's starting weight, current weight and goal weight, as well as their current loss percentages.
Fred Moyer

When it's Grim, be the GRIM REAPER!

Offline Lincoln4

  • Born again Idahoan
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1270
  • Location: Middleton, Idaho
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #139 on: January 02, 2013, 07:21:16 AM »
219   :bdid:   Goal - 190

On the other hand, I was 228 when I started eating better and consistently working out mid-March 2012.  Was down to 203 in late September.  What the hell, it took me nearly 49 years to get there.  Who cares if it takes me a few to get back to 160-170?
Husband, Dad, and Grandpa
USN 82-88
Second Amendment Foundation
Gun Owners of America
Cancer Survivor
Retired LEO
Political Refugee

Offline Machias

  • Trapper
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 18956
  • Location: Worley, ID
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #140 on: January 02, 2013, 08:00:05 AM »
319  Goal is 200.
Fred Moyer

When it's Grim, be the GRIM REAPER!

Offline et1702

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 950
  • Location: Duvall
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #141 on: January 02, 2013, 09:25:06 AM »

249.4  Goal is 225lbs.  Got to 235 last year, but put it all back on after archery elk.  Going to get to 225 this year and keep it there!!!

ET

Offline sweetfreedomgirl

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 125
  • Location: Palouse, WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/ThiaQueensOfCamo
  • Groups: Washington for Wildlife
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #142 on: January 02, 2013, 09:27:59 AM »
174 Ugh....I swore I wouldn't put on those 10 holiday pounds! How the heck did that happen?  Goal weight is 130.
Thia
Queens of Camo TV
If God didn't want us to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat.

Blogging at www.queensofcamo.com

Offline runningboard

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 1496
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #143 on: January 02, 2013, 09:34:24 AM »
as posted before starting weight was 250.6, heaviest ever was 263, goal is 200> by july and ultimately 168-173.
Romans 14:2 he who eats only vegetables is weak
Genesis 27:3 Now then, get your equipment—your quiver and bow—and go out to the open country to hunt some wild game for me

Offline pendoreilleadventures

  • Moose Whisper
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 922
  • Location: Cusick, washington
    • https://www.facebook.com/brian.benham.16
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #144 on: January 02, 2013, 09:35:26 AM »
I am in I don't have a scale so I'll post once I get my scale back from my in laws. last time i check I was 350. I need to get in better shape goal is to be around 245. I'll post actual weight once I get my scale back.
“Vegetarians are cool. All I eat are vegetarians--except for the occasional mountain lion steak.”
― Ted Nugent

Offline Machias

  • Trapper
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 18956
  • Location: Worley, ID
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #145 on: January 02, 2013, 11:06:41 AM »
Hey hey, a little bit of good news for us fat folks.  :)

In a review of almost 100 past studies covering nearly three million people, researchers found that being overweight or slightly obese was linked to about a 6 percent lower risk of dying, compared to people considered "normal weight."

Being severely obese, however, was still tied to an almost 30 percent higher risk of death.

The idea that being somewhat overweight could be linked to better health has been dubbed the obesity paradox, even though actual obesity is generally not associated with the apparent "benefit."

"This is actually the common finding," said the new study's lead author Katherine Flegal, a senior scientist from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Hyattsville, Maryland.

Her work, she said, confirms what previous analyses found - a link between being somewhat overweight and having a lower risk of death.

The paradox, as scientists have called it, is based on past findings that suggest overweight and obese people - even those with additional health problems - live longer than their thinner counterparts.

Some have argued that the pattern is a statistical one only because being thin, especially in old age, is often a sign or a result of serious illness - so the thinner people seem to have higher mortality.

The study results certainly do not give people permission to pack on extra pounds, according to Dr. Steven Heymsfield, the executive director of the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

Heymsfield, who co-authored an editorial accompanying the new report, said the difference in mortality between overweight and normal weight people is probably very small.

"That's actually a very small number. It's probably only statistically significant because of the large number she had in her study," he added.

Also, there are concerns that body mass index (BMI) - a measurement of weight in relation to height - is not an accurate measure of someone's health risks.

For example, Heymsfield said a soldier may be considered overweight but still be healthy, because he or she has more muscle mass.

"It's not a good marker for body fat or health risk," he said.

There is also confusion around what BMI should be considered "normal," which is why Flegal and her colleagues conducted their analysis.

Past studies looking at the link between BMI and death used varying ranges to describe normal weight, overweight and obesity.

"There seems to be a lot of confusion about this whole area, and part of the confusion is that people are using a bunch of different categories," said Flegal.

For the new analysis, the researchers, who published their results in the Journal of the American Medical Association, used data from past studies, and classified the risks according to BMI categories accepted by the World Health Organization and the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Those organizations consider a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 normal weight, between 25 and 29.9 overweight, and 30 or above obese. They further subdivide the obese category, though - with a BMI between 30 and 34.9 designated grade-1 obesity, and anything above 35 grades 2 or 3.

The researchers reviewed databases of medical research and found 97 studies that looked at weight and mortality risk. Combined, Flegal and her colleagues had information on about 2.9 million people from around the world and 270,000 deaths.

Being obese - in general - was linked to an 18 percent greater risk of death, compared to being normal weight. Being severely obese - grades 2 and 3 - was linked to a 29 percent greater risk of death.

However, being merely overweight was linked to a 6 percent decreased risk of death compared to a normal weight person, while being slightly (grade 1) obese was linked to a 5 percent lower risk.

The study cannot say why there seems to be a link between being overweight or slightly obese and a lower risk of death.

"We don't have the data to look at the physiological mechanisms, and that wasn't our goal," said Flegal.

"Our contribution - I hope - is just to summarize it to show what other articles are showing," she said.

For Heymsfield, the findings reinforce the common belief that increased weight is tied to an increased risk of death, but highlights the fact that someone classified as "overweight" is not necessarily "very unhealthy."

On the other hand, he warns, important markers of health, such as blood pressure and cholesterol, do respond to minor changes in weight.

"So gaining that extra 10 or 20 pounds can put you into a dangerous category, and it's important to find out if you're one of those people," he said.
Fred Moyer

When it's Grim, be the GRIM REAPER!

Offline CoachNemo

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 193
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #146 on: January 02, 2013, 11:22:51 AM »
279 this morning.  Need to get this weight off so I can be around for the baby gracing us with his presence in February. 

Good luck all!

Offline Elkrunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 2261
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #147 on: January 02, 2013, 11:43:16 AM »
210.4 with a goal of 175 by elk season
« Last Edit: January 02, 2013, 11:54:15 AM by Elkrunner »

Offline axelfisher

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 142
  • Location: Everett, Wa
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #148 on: January 02, 2013, 03:22:41 PM »
Time to get rid of the lingering College Football weight! 272 Best of luck to everyone! Goal weight of 235.

Offline wranglernqtrhorses

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 29
Re: 2013 Hunt WA Biggest Loser Comp
« Reply #149 on: January 02, 2013, 04:08:33 PM »
Here is what I have so far:  (let me know if there are any spelling errors, or other changes that need to be made).  You can post your weight as often or as little as you want - and will upload the spreadsheet as often as needed.


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

New to Grouse hunting by ChrisCox4912
[Today at 12:30:53 PM]


Scotty Pulling Slow by Rick
[Today at 12:23:32 PM]


Help!! Blew out my boots. by washingtonmuley
[Today at 12:20:28 PM]


Anyone use Rod's Meats in Mead? by huntnnw
[Today at 11:50:41 AM]


Pinks! by pickardjw
[Today at 11:50:19 AM]


One day and a wake-up by DaNewb
[Today at 11:06:16 AM]


What are elk eating now by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 10:52:22 AM]


Quality Archery Opener by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 10:51:21 AM]


2025 sheds….let's see em by redi
[Today at 10:50:03 AM]


Buck and doe hit by swanderek
[Today at 09:05:20 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by no.cen.wa
[Today at 08:55:14 AM]


Saturday double on black bears by mtndew
[Today at 07:11:18 AM]


CWD testing in ALL 100 series GMU's is now mandatory by HUNTIN4SIX
[Yesterday at 10:26:49 PM]


Fries with Eyes by Angry Perch
[Yesterday at 09:45:25 PM]


Multi Season leftovers by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 09:39:21 PM]


Roadless Rule Public Comment by Moose Master
[Yesterday at 08:33:25 PM]


2025 NWTF South Sound Strutters Banquet by Russ McDonald
[Yesterday at 07:17:36 PM]


2025 Canning by Angry Perch
[Yesterday at 06:59:33 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 05:55:57 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 05:16:43 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal