collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: methow observations  (Read 14392 times)

Offline bigmacc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 4581
  • Location: the woods
methow observations
« on: September 30, 2013, 07:02:59 PM »
im new to the forum as far as contributions and promise i will post up some pics of past hunts with friends and family as soon as i get a little better at this..1st time posting anything on any forum but i have enjoyed "lurking"on here for awhile reading stories and looking at some of the fine animals many of you have harvested. as for myself,i have hunted the methow for over 40 years and my family has hunted it since the early 1920,s. my great grandparents were good friends of the sullivans(who sullivans pond is named after)they hunted his property years ago before he sold it(or donated a lot of it) to the game dept. my self and family have enjoyed some great hunting,great memories and been thru the ups and downs of great hunting years and the not so good "rebuilding" years after bad winters. we are hard hunters,do our homework with scouting during migrations in both fall and spring. weve hunted the valley from the canadian border to pateros and i must say our latest scouting trip that lasted 3 days was nothing short of dismall. we concentrated mostly on the north part of the valley(from winthrop  north, and east and west of the chewuch river up to about 2 to 6 thousand ft elavation. there is alot of feed and browse available i know because of some mild wet springs and the deer are spread out but i have seen those years before in the past but have allways found a lot of deer still. in 3 days in the areas we were in we saw about 15 deer lots of yotes,2 bears,1cougar and wolf tracks but did not see a wolf. predetors have and will continue to "eat away"at this once mighty heard.i remember the winter of 1968 when winthrop washington was for one day the coldest spot in the continental u.s(i believe it was 67 below 0) a freak, flash freeze came down from canada and the temp dropped from about 20 above to 60 something below zero in a matter of hours. we have 8 mil footage of  livestock and deer that locals had bulldozed into piles,dumped diesel on them and set them on fire,it was a bad,bad deal and thousands of animals froze or starved.it put a big dent in the heard but within years it bounced back.the mule deer are a hearty,proud animal(thats why my great grandma would come unglued if she saw someone hang them with their head down) she would always say to "hang him head up,hes a proud animal and he deserves respect". in my opinion the methow herd may never bounce back from this predetor issue,as they have the bad winters and other problems of the past. it will only continue to get worse i believe.its a sad time for such a proud animal. just my observations...

Offline hillbillyhunting

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 620
  • Location: Western WA
Re: methow observations
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2013, 07:13:21 PM »
WOW... thanks for sharing your experiences.  Good luck on the fresh 2013 season.  We wait all year for this time... enjoy it!

Offline mkcj

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 1945
  • Location: Seatac/Winthrop,Wash
Re: methow observations
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2013, 07:19:32 PM »
Welcome! The summer of 68 was the year we built our cabin and when we went up in the spring of 69 every window in the cabin was broken from the cold and even though I was 5 I remember all the animals laying dead in the fields. Then to make things worse they issued I think 1000 doe tag's in 224 and close to that in 218 for a couple years and that was the first nail in the coffin for that herd. :twocents: This summer I have been working a lot of OT, my last day off was labor day so I am short on deer number's in the hills this year.

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 17764
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: methow observations
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2013, 07:25:51 PM »
Welcome to the forum bigmacc. Unfortunately the tree huggers have won one the wolf issue and we all are paying the price for their agenda. Hopefully we can turn the tide in the near future, but things look bleak if you ask me.
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline mkcj

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 1945
  • Location: Seatac/Winthrop,Wash
Re: methow observations
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2013, 07:37:45 PM »
Does anyone else have a bad feeling about the way the season is starting, meaning with this early snow it's going to start moving the herd down which will be great for hunting. There is the problem though can the herd sustain many more migrating buck's that might be taken than on a normal year, Then including the ever growing predator problem we have >:(. I hope I'm wrong

Offline bigmacc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 4581
  • Location: the woods
Re: methow observations
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2013, 07:38:37 PM »
thanks for the "welcomes" everyone. once i get better at this i,ll post up some "good ole days"pics. have lots going back to the 30,s of our camps and hunting trips. no "honey hole" info tho :chuckle: :chuckle:

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 17764
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: methow observations
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2013, 08:03:20 PM »
Does anyone else have a bad feeling about the way the season is starting, meaning with this early snow it's going to start moving the herd down which will be great for hunting. There is the problem though can the herd sustain many more migrating buck's that might be taken than on a normal year, Then including the ever growing predator problem we have >:(. I hope I'm wrong

I get the same feeling a lot less deer same amount of hunters plus this wether if it stays this way will push the herds lower earlier than I have ever seen. Well at least some people will get some nice bucks and bulls before the wolves eat them. :bash:
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline Ridgerunner

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 4917
  • Location: Enumclaw
Re: methow observations
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2013, 08:59:04 PM »
Can't wait for the stories and old time pics.

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 15706
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: methow observations
« Reply #8 on: September 30, 2013, 09:02:06 PM »
First of all bigmacc welcome. I must say your comments confirm what many of us have witnessed and experienced in the Methow Valley. I have hunted, hiked the area most of my life. The days of going out and seeing 35+ deer on an evening stroll are a thing of the past. Yet they continue to increase the once precious, and coveted special permits.
I have sent comments to the WDFW conveying my displeasure for how the area is handled but it seems to fall on deaf ears. Then there is the local wildlife biologist who consistently suggests that the deer population is more than adequate for the region. Everyone knows he is just buying his time until he retires. My suggestion to you is to email the WDFW and state your observations. Everyone knows the area is one of the most impacted by the growth in the wolf population.  Again thanks for conveying your observations. The days of the mighty Methow herd are a thing of the past.
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline mkcj

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 1945
  • Location: Seatac/Winthrop,Wash
Re: methow observations
« Reply #9 on: October 01, 2013, 12:07:57 AM »
They get away with the inflated number's I think because if you stay around town or at the state park the deer are all over the place, A lot different story when you get out of town and up into the hills so most people assume there has to be deer all over the place :bash:

Offline MADMAX

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 7296
  • Location: Kitsap
  • I like big bucks and I can not lie
Re: methow observations
« Reply #10 on: October 01, 2013, 05:51:13 AM »
swell !
I checked the 10 day forecast , sounds like the snow level going back up
« Last Edit: October 01, 2013, 06:03:43 AM by MADMAX »
I Ain't Captain Walker.
I'm The Guy Who Carries Mr. Dead In His Pocket


What would life be without the thrill of the hunt ?

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8635
  • Location: NCW
Re: methow observations
« Reply #11 on: October 01, 2013, 09:54:31 AM »
The WDFW report at the recent meeting over here was that there was a 34:100 buck  to doe ratio during their counts last year.  What they forgot to mention was how many overall deer to get this ratio.  "They didn't have the exact numbers" LOL.  I'm betting 100 :twocents:.  Again, these studies are ridiculous, bacause they are done when all the deer are down, making them easier to see from the air.  Lot's of country for those deer to disperse in during hunting seasons.  Also, they said there was a 25% harvest rate last year and that the numbers were high for a successful season.  Really?  No way.  Again, what they failed to mention is that these were the numbers for the whole state including second deer tags and antlerless tags throughout all the seasons.  Good luck to everybody hunting north central WA this year, and don't expect a banner year like they're predicting.  Reality is, I've seen FAR less deer this year, then I've ever seen before.  :twocents: 

Offline bigmacc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 4581
  • Location: the woods
Re: methow observations
« Reply #12 on: October 01, 2013, 04:20:05 PM »
The WDFW report at the recent meeting over here was that there was a 34:100 buck  to doe ratio during their counts last year.  What they forgot to mention was how many overall deer to get this ratio.  "They didn't have the exact numbers" LOL.  I'm betting 100 :twocents:.  Again, these studies are ridiculous, bacause they are done when all the deer are down, making them easier to see from the air.  Lot's of country for those deer to disperse in during hunting seasons.  Also, they said there was a 25% harvest rate last year and that the numbers were high for a successful season.  Really?  No way.  Again, what they failed to mention is that these were the numbers for the whole state including second deer tags and antlerless tags throughout all the seasons.  Good luck to everybody hunting north central WA this year, and don't expect a banner year like they're predicting.  Reality is, I've seen FAR less deer this year, then I've ever seen before.  :twocents:


I agree...as far as their buck to doe ratios for the area,ive often wondered if they if maybe they just take a drive thru the state park or drive from one end of town to the other and count the deer in peoples yards :chuckle:..Some of the years weve been the most succesful were years the ratio was 8 or 9 per 100 and bucks were everywhere :dunno:...before he retired years ago,Jim Mountjoy(the warden at the time)would come to our camp a few times during the season,sit around the fire and b.s with us,we would pick his brain and sometimes hed pick ours to find out where the deer were.hes a good man and one of the last ones i myself could really believe.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4508
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: methow observations
« Reply #13 on: October 01, 2013, 04:26:17 PM »
I think they are already running damage control.....trying to avert the panic, hoping to keep tag sales as high as possible right up until the problem is slap your face obvious to everyone............I cant believe anyone can take wdfws word on anything......... :twocents:

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8635
  • Location: NCW
Re: methow observations
« Reply #14 on: October 01, 2013, 04:31:35 PM »
The WDFW report at the recent meeting over here was that there was a 34:100 buck  to doe ratio during their counts last year.  What they forgot to mention was how many overall deer to get this ratio.  "They didn't have the exact numbers" LOL.  I'm betting 100 :twocents:.  Again, these studies are ridiculous, bacause they are done when all the deer are down, making them easier to see from the air.  Lot's of country for those deer to disperse in during hunting seasons.  Also, they said there was a 25% harvest rate last year and that the numbers were high for a successful season.  Really?  No way.  Again, what they failed to mention is that these were the numbers for the whole state including second deer tags and antlerless tags throughout all the seasons.  Good luck to everybody hunting north central WA this year, and don't expect a banner year like they're predicting.  Reality is, I've seen FAR less deer this year, then I've ever seen before.  :twocents:


I agree...as far as their buck to doe ratios for the area,ive often wondered if they if maybe they just take a drive thru the state park or drive from one end of town to the other and count the deer in peoples yards :chuckle:..Some of the years weve been the most succesful were years the ratio was 8 or 9 per 100 and bucks were everywhere :dunno:...before he retired years ago,Jim Mountjoy(the warden at the time)would come to our camp a few times during the season,sit around the fire and b.s with us,we would pick his brain and sometimes hed pick ours to find out where the deer were.hes a good man and one of the last ones i myself could really believe.

Jim wasn't the warden, but the lands manager up there.  Great guy.  Pat Heenan probably was the warden up there at that time.  Cal Treser is the Warden up there now, and he's the only WDFW guy in that area I'd believe a word out of.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Walked a cougar down by Rainier10
[Today at 11:17:49 AM]


Springer Fishing Opportunity 3/29 & 3/30 by xXLojackXx
[Today at 10:13:39 AM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by Machias
[Today at 09:19:44 AM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by hughjorgan
[Today at 09:03:26 AM]


Springer 2024 Columbia River by WSU
[Today at 08:31:10 AM]


Average by lhrbull
[Today at 07:31:56 AM]


Let’s see your best Washington buck by Pathfinder101
[Today at 07:22:11 AM]


CVA optima V2 LR tapped hole for front sight by Remdawg
[Today at 07:09:22 AM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]


Lowest power 22 round? by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 08:06:13 PM]


1x scopes vs open sights by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:29:35 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal