Thermal vs. Night vision??

[jrebel]

Pros and cons for both....from the folks that have experienced on or the other. 

I'm looking to outfit a 300 blackout that is suppressed.  16.5" barrel with 101 grain bullet....with max affective range of 250-300 yards.  Figure most shots will be under 100 given the place I will be hunting the most. 

Which is better for brushier country in the NE corner? 
What is the effective range of both...meaning how far / how well you can identify coyotes?
Which has better clarity / definition on game?? 

Anything else I'm missing??  Any recommendations of actual scopes? 

Thanks

Jrebel

[ASHQUACK]

I just bought a ATN LTV 3 night vision. For my 300blk. I haven't shot it much yet and haven't hunted it. But I'm finding that it isn't nearly as clear in the brush as I'd hoped. The big thing I see is that in total darkness (timber) I have to use the ir illumination to see anything at all. My starry eyed purchase isn't all that I'd hoped for shooting yotes at night. Just not all that impressed as of now.

[Alchase]

Here you go, coyote hunting at night with gear needs.

Most of the night hunters here use Thermal.

[Blacktail Sniper]

I just grabbed this one while on sale:

https://www.cabelas.com/shop/en/sightmark-wraith-hd-digital-rifle-scope

Waiting on an extended scope base as it is going on a Bolt action.  I think it is meant to work out of the box on an AR platform, as the eye relief on my Savage is too far forward just mounting directly on the rail.

First impression just powering it up and playing with it a little off gun, it does have a smaller field of view since the base is 4x mag.  The IR illuminator is definately needed.

I watched several Youtube videos on this particular model and several others both IR & thermal, seemed to get a decent review for the price and as a starter night site.

My wallet is not currently big enough to go thermal, but if I like how this one shakes out or if I can't stand it, it was at a price that seemed reasonable for a beginer like myself to give it a go.

Once my extended base arrives and I get it mounted, I will probably do a follow-up post on how well or not it works. 

[jrebel]

I just grabbed this one while on sale:

https://www.cabelas.com/shop/en/sightmark-wraith-hd-digital-rifle-scope

Waiting on an extended scope base as it is going on a Bolt action.  I think it is meant to work out of the box on an AR platform, as the eye relief on my Savage is too far forward just mounting directly on the rail.

First impression just powering it up and playing with it a little off gun, it does have a smaller field of view since the base is 4x mag.  The IR illuminator is definately needed.

I watched several Youtube videos on this particular model and several others both IR & thermal, seemed to get a decent review for the price and as a starter night site.

My wallet is not currently big enough to go thermal, but if I like how this one shakes out or if I can't stand it, it was at a price that seemed reasonable for a beginer like myself to give it a go.

Once my extended base arrives and I get it mounted, I will probably do a follow-up post on how well or not it works.

Can't wait to hear a review.  I am a beginner and plan on hunting yotes on the property.  I have a couple places that would offer cross draw shots (200 ish yards) but most will be under 100 yards.  My biggest concern is the brushy nature of the property (not wide open farm land) and would love to see them critters as they are coming. 

[Thermal Predator Control]

What’s your budget?  Don’t waste your $ on night-vision. Thermal is the only was to go.  The best bang for your buck thermal that I sell right now is the SightMark Wraith Thermal Scope 35mm for $1799. The price goes up from there.  Just remember, you get what you pay for with this stuff

[Pnwrider]

Thermal hunting is a great way to feel poor. I have no experience with night vision, but have spent time looking through thermals ranging from sub $2k up to $15k and every price jump was very noticeable in terms of you get what you pay for. I don’t think I’d want to try and hunt with any of the entry level thermals. That said, technology keeps improving and I’m hoping thermals go the way of tvs, computers, etc and we start seeing less expensive “decent” options.

[birdshooter1189]

I’ve used digital night vision (Sightmark photon and wraith, and DIY scope mount kits), and some thermal.  Digital night vision can work well in some conditions.  Thermal is more versatile, and in some situations, it completely outshines digital NV.  Sometimes thermal struggles too.  (Thick fog, or right after rain (the rain makes everything the same temperature. Animals will stand out, but landscape will all blurr together).

Example:
With Digital NV you are looking at a coyote at 150 yds. Its head is behind a bush so you don’t see a reflection from its eyes.  At 60 yds, there is a tree that is 5’ to the side of your line of sight to the coyote.  Your IR illuminator lights up the tree so bright that everything behind it is lost in the shadows. You move your scope to the side to get the tree out of the screen and then the darker background gets brighter and you can make out the body of the coyote.  You move the scope back over to put the crosshairs on it, but now the tree gets bright and you lose sight of the coyote. Very frustrating. 2 days later you post your Digital NV for sale on HW forum.

Now imagine the same setup, but you don’t know the coyote is there. You are scanning back and forth with the NV.  You will probably never see the coyote unless it moves and looks at you and you see its eyes light up.

Now imagine the same situation with thermal.  The coyotes warm body stands out like a sore thumb. The tree at 60 yds is just a dark shadow in your viewfinder.  It doesn’t matter if the coyote is looking at you or not, it’s body is hot and very visible.  The only struggle is that you might not know if it’s a coyote, wolf, deer, skunk, raccoon, or deer.  It depends what angle it is at, and whether it’s bedded, standing, sitting, etc.  You will likely need to wait until it moves a little bit to be confident on ID. (The quality of your thermal will also impact how long you have to look at it to determine ID)

I’ve been running thermal for about 6 months now. I rarely use my digital NV anymore.  I have a 384 resolution scope and scanner.  3.5x base zoom on both. Both have LRF. Both pulsar.  I’m happy with the scope.  I wish I had a scanner with wider FOV and more clarity.  Pulsar Helion XP50 or Telos XP50, 640 sensor, or similar. LRF is a great feature.  Probably not necessary to have on both scanner and scope.  If shooting a 300 blackout, knowing your range will be more important.

[birdshooter1189]

I "window shopped" thermal for several years.  I finally met a person who is a thermal distributor and had a couple different thermal scopes and scanners. I went hunting with him a couple times and that's what helped me decide what I wanted and then I purchased from him.

I suggest reaching out to Thermal Predator Control and see if you can meet up and look through a few different thermal options.  Looking through it yourself in person is far more helpful then watching youtube videos. (Though those are fun and helpful too)

[wadu1]

I used one like this while in the Army back in the day (AN-TVS-2B). Mine was mounted on a 20mm, very good out to about 1500m.

[b23]

What’s your budget?  Don’t waste your $ on night-vision. Thermal is the only was to go.  The best bang for your buck thermal that I sell right now is the SightMark Wraith Thermal Scope 35mm for $1799. The price goes up from there.  Just remember, you get what you pay for with this stuff

With Shot Show coming up after the first of the year have you heard if there is anything new coming out from anyone that'll get your attention?  Usually by now you hear of some cool new thermal/s that's coming but I haven't read much about anything new that'll be out. 

You being a dealer I'm guessing you hear about things that are coming a lot sooner than the rest of us do.

[Thermal Predator Control]

What’s your budget?  Don’t waste your $ on night-vision. Thermal is the only was to go.  The best bang for your buck thermal that I sell right now is the SightMark Wraith Thermal Scope 35mm for $1799. The price goes up from there.  Just remember, you get what you pay for with this stuff

With Shot Show coming up after the first of the year have you heard if there is anything new coming out from anyone that'll get your attention?  Usually by now you hear of some cool new thermal/s that's coming but I haven't read much about anything new that'll be out. 

You being a dealer I'm guessing you hear about things that are coming a lot sooner than the rest of us do.

Honestly I havnt heard anything new coming out at SHOT 2024.  Only thing new that’s out is the Thermion XL50 LRF, it’s a 1024 resolution, but the base magnification is only 1.75. This caters more towards hog hunter because of the wide field of view.  It’s unfortunate because I had high hopes for it since I’ve been running the Merger XL50s since spring. The Merger has the same sensor as the Thermion so I knew what the image was going to look like. They screwed up coyot hunters on this one.  The other scope a lot of people are talking about is the IRay Rico Hybrid 640 50mm, it’s a 3.0 base magnification.

[huntingfool7]

@Thermal Predator Control   How does the image from the Merger compare to the Halo?  Does the 1024 resolution offer a significantly noticable step up?   Considering an XL50 but wish they'd gone with a 2.5 base mag.  Weird that Pulsar didn't at least match the base mag of the XP50.  A 14 degree FOV would be awesome if most of your shooting is under 100 yards on large groups of pigs.

[b23]

Only thing new that’s out is the Thermion XL50 LRF, it’s a 1024 resolution

How would you compare the image of the Thermion and Merger HD 1024 res to N-Vision Halo's 640 res.?  Is the Pulsar's HD 1024 noticeably better then the N-Vision Halo's or not really as big a difference as it may sound on paper??  Appreciate you feedback and insight on this stuff.

[Thermal Predator Control]

Only thing new that’s out is the Thermion XL50 LRF, it’s a 1024 resolution

How would you compare the image of the Thermion and Merger HD 1024 res to N-Vision Halo's 640 res.?  Is the Pulsar's HD 1024 noticeably better then the N-Vision Halo's or not really as big a difference as it may sound on paper??  Appreciate you feedback and insight on this stuff.

N-Vision is still king in my book, but not by much.  On a low humidity night the Halo XRF shines.  But with that said, high humidity/fog nights,  I have been able to see coyots with the Merger and not the Halo XRF out at further distances. I receive the Thermion in the mail today and will do side by side comparisons out in the field.  The base mag between the Thermion and Halo XRF will be considerably noticeable