collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?  (Read 29604 times)

Offline arguhl

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 11
Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« on: May 04, 2012, 03:54:07 PM »
Im going to be buying a new pack in the next couple weeks and I need some input from fellow hunters. I'm looking at the Opw whole shabang or the kifaru duplex
Timberline 2. Both have there pros and cons, price and weight being the biggest two factors. The Opw weighs in at almost ten pounds which is heavy to say the least , the kifaru just under three pounds, that six pound difference is huge in my book. The cons for the kifaru, the price tag which is well a lot to say the least. I love the diversity of the opw but also take into consideration the more parts in a system the more points for potential failure. This is important considering my uncanny ability to take any piece of Gear and destory it with use. I've read the majority of reviews on both that are available just looking for some more opinions and or thoughts from guys that have used these packs hard in the field. I'm interested in the field reports not just impression from handling the pAck at a show. Thanks so much Andrew
« Last Edit: May 05, 2012, 12:51:08 PM by arguhl »

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8689
  • Location: NCW
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2012, 04:13:03 PM »
Never used the OPW, but will say you won't be disappointed in the Kifaru.

Offline couesbitten

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 1390
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2012, 07:58:58 AM »
Never used either one, but there's a reason that Kifaru is so popular.
With the catching ends the pleasure of the chase. - Abraham Lincoln

Offline JPhelps

  • I EAT ELK!!!
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 2913
  • Location: Pe Ell
  • Groups: Rmef, NWTF
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2012, 08:07:35 AM »
If you have the $$$, Kifaru is hard to beat.

I found a used Dana Designs Terraframe Longbed XL (external framed load monster) and can't be happier.  Might be worth looking into.  Last year I packed 160+ lbs for over 10 miles and I couldn't have asked for anything more (except less weight) :tup:

Offline arguhl

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 11
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2012, 12:53:10 PM »
I want to correct my statement about the kifaru pack with the frame it weighs six pounds. The timberline d2 is super appealing because you can switch the bags that attach to the frame. Very slick for sure and the frame appears heavy duty

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 4075
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2012, 12:56:30 PM »
I recently ordered a kifaru duplex t2 (5200) with the cargo panel and a few other extras, but havent put my hands on it yet so I cant personally vouch for it, although did extensive research on numerous packs and decided on kifaru. One thing I can recomend is- that if you want a duplex or any kifaru pack you had better get it ordered, mine is already gunna be a little late for some of my scouting trips this year (expected shiping date is late july :yike:). Good luck......Josh
Go hawks

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3513
  • Location: west coast
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2012, 01:03:07 PM »
six pounds  :yike:...my shelter,sleeping bag,stove,raingear,sleeping pad,and a days worth of food weighs in at six pounds..never used the kifaru but i would never buy a pack over 3 pounds,realy no reason to pack that extra weight  :twocents:

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 4075
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #7 on: May 05, 2012, 01:06:45 PM »
good luck finding a solid pack capable of carrying out 100 lbs of meat and gear that weighs 3lbs, these arent day packs by the way
Go hawks

Offline JPhelps

  • I EAT ELK!!!
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 2913
  • Location: Pe Ell
  • Groups: Rmef, NWTF
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #8 on: May 05, 2012, 01:15:24 PM »
 :yeah:

Show me a sub 3 lb pack that can haul 100+ lbs and carry 7+ days worth of gear and I am all ears.

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3513
  • Location: west coast
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #9 on: May 05, 2012, 01:23:01 PM »
good luck finding a solid pack capable of carrying out 100 lbs of meat and gear that weighs 3lbs, these arent day packs by the way

haha they are out there,my frame is spot on 3 pounds and has noooo prob carying 100 pound loads. its just one of those plastic style military frames(same frame the wilderness pack uses) with a 35liter dry sack on it.nothing fancey,no pockets,no extra gizmos.no extra weight
il try and find a pic but i think you get the idea
« Last Edit: May 05, 2012, 01:33:06 PM by kentrek »

Offline romaknows

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 349
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #10 on: May 05, 2012, 01:33:43 PM »
KU 5200 :tup:
high country rules!

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 4075
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #11 on: May 05, 2012, 01:34:52 PM »
good luck finding a solid pack capable of carrying out 100 lbs of meat and gear that weighs 3lbs, these arent day packs by the way

haha they are out there,my frame is spot on 3 pounds and has noooo prob carying 100 pound loads. its just one of those plastic style military frames(same frame the wilderness pack uses) with a 35liter dry sack on it.nothing fancey,no pockets,no extra gizmos.no extra weight
il try and find a pic but i think you get the idea

thats not apples to apples, im talking frame and pack both. going with just a frame is a good option to save weight no doubt, but doesnt suit the needs of everyone....
Go hawks

Offline JPhelps

  • I EAT ELK!!!
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 2913
  • Location: Pe Ell
  • Groups: Rmef, NWTF
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #12 on: May 05, 2012, 01:38:14 PM »
romaknows - That's the ONLY "pack".  Then the question of durability comes up.  I think the Kifaru Timberline is the best balance of Weight/Ruggedness.

Offline Alpine Mojo

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 640
  • Location: Holding out in King County
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #13 on: May 05, 2012, 02:32:42 PM »
yup, KU5200
Friend: "Are you free tonight?"
Me:  (Gazing into the distance as a bald eagle screeches)  "I'm always free"

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3513
  • Location: west coast
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #14 on: May 05, 2012, 03:11:39 PM »
good luck finding a solid pack capable of carrying out 100 lbs of meat and gear that weighs 3lbs, these arent day packs by the way

haha they are out there,my frame is spot on 3 pounds and has noooo prob carying 100 pound loads. its just one of those plastic style military frames(same frame the wilderness pack uses) with a 35liter dry sack on it.nothing fancey,no pockets,no extra gizmos.no extra weight
il try and find a pic but i think you get the idea

thats not apples to apples, im talking frame and pack both. going with just a frame is a good option to save weight no doubt, but doesnt suit the needs of everyone....

 my main point is i would just go for the lighter pack, i have no idea of the "needs" or wants of arguhl or other peaple on here.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

12th Annual - 2026 YOUTH TURKEY HUNT CONTEST (enter by Mar 15) by locdown21
[Today at 12:01:34 AM]


Second Choice by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:05:12 PM]


Multi season draw odds by MeatMissile
[Yesterday at 10:21:25 PM]


Help me understand youth moose by WSU
[Yesterday at 10:09:05 PM]


New Wetside Hunter by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 10:03:18 PM]


Big game season proposals by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 09:51:37 PM]


Best state for trophy whitetail or Canada? by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 08:21:06 PM]


Sky Rover Binoculars. Alpha glass, bargain price. by Doublelunger
[Yesterday at 08:10:20 PM]


2026 North Central WA Mule Deer Foundation Banquet is approaching! by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 07:38:23 PM]


12th Annual 'Pull For Scouting' Clay Crushing Classic by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 07:08:01 PM]


Ouchie momma UTAH by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Yesterday at 07:04:30 PM]


Bucket List Elk shed help wanted by elkrack
[Yesterday at 06:33:43 PM]


FWC Smith and Rowland sharing documents to media while under investigation by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 05:44:17 PM]


2026 regs are out by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 04:41:51 PM]


Backyard Bobcat Bait by Loup Loup
[Yesterday at 04:10:12 PM]


Hound puppies $300 by aclark
[Yesterday at 02:52:23 PM]


Now we wait(Montana) by vandeman17
[Yesterday at 02:52:08 PM]


Question about hunting wilderness areas by cmp150
[Yesterday at 01:50:56 PM]


Breakfast entertainment by 10Key
[Yesterday at 01:17:33 PM]


Interested in speaking at the April meeting? CCW has you covered. by Elkaholic daWg
[Yesterday at 12:04:09 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal