Free: Contests & Raffles.
I have a buddy that tooka a cow through the MH program in this area. I think this is likely the best route to take/expand to solve the issue. It gives controlled harvest with straight forward guidelines. I wish you didn't have to be a MH to do it, but it may be the right tool for this problem...
There's no shortage of free resources to accomplish what they need to accomplish. The problem is that the Department of Watchable Wildlife has to actually think of our state's 175,000 hunters as part of the solution. ...... We're only every going to lose if we don't seek to change the entire administration of this section of our government.
Special T why MH? Why not General or Permit? Would spread hunters out more, as others have stated could push the elk back in the hills.
Pman your spot on. The WDFW culture does not see us sportmen as an asset, just a $$$.FH I like a general season. I wish they had a general for archery and/or muzzy like they did before. I just mention the MH program because its a program that is currently in place doing some of this work. It wouldn't be hard to expand it only the fly to take care of issues like this one. WDFW hates general bad press so i think that is why we no longer have a archery or Muzzy general in that area. there have been a couple of incidents that have created bad press. Unfortunately many people fail to realize that this area is less of a hunt, but more a of harvest situation. Killing large amounts of animals in general view of the public isn't PC. I think that is why the feds were doing it at night.
Quote from: Special T on October 29, 2013, 12:18:13 PMI have a buddy that tooka a cow through the MH program in this area. I think this is likely the best route to take/expand to solve the issue. It gives controlled harvest with straight forward guidelines. I wish you didn't have to be a MH to do it, but it may be the right tool for this problem...MHs are a tool of the state DF&W. They could call in anyone they want to accomplish the goals they need to accomplish. In addition, they could send out a bulletin asking hunters to register for emergency free tags and have an orientation required before they can receive one. There's no shortage of free resources to accomplish what they need to accomplish. The problem is that the Department of Watchable Wildlife has to actually think of our state's 175,000 hunters as part of the solution. They don't, ever. In any situation where animals need to be culled, they reach for the purse strings instead of asking, "how can we make this a win-win for the state using hunters instead of throwing money at it?". The entire culture of the DFW needs to change and it needs to start at the top. If everyone isn't pounding their fists on their representatives' desks about this and about how the department is run in general, they should start immediately. We're only every going to lose if we don't seek to change the entire administration of this section of our government.